{"title":"界面压力测量系统的精度","authors":"V. Allen , D.W. Ryan , N. Lomax , A. Murray","doi":"10.1016/0141-5425(93)90014-P","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Interface pressure measurement is needed to assess beds designed to prevent pressure sores, so it is therefore important to establish the accuracy of interface pressure measuring systems. In this study, the Talley SA500 pressure evaluator (with 28 mm and 100 mm sensor pads), the DIPE (with 100 mm sensor pad), and a water-filled bladder system (with 0.1 ml and 0.3 ml water) were assessed. Measurement errors were evaluated using a loading system with pressures up to 7.4 kPa (55 mm Hg) in steps of 0.9 kPa (6.9 mm Hg). All systems tested over-measured interface pressure, the error being approximately linearly proportional to the loading pressure. The repeatability for a given system was approximately constant. The mean error (± SD) (%) and repeatability (kPa) for the systems were: 28 mm Talley 12 ± 1%, ± 0.07 kPa; 100 mm Talley 15 ± 1%, ± 0.07 kPa; DIPE 27 ± 3%, ± 0.12 kPa; 0.1 ml water bladder 17 ± 1%, ± 0.13 kPa; 0.3 ml water bladder 26 ± 3%, ± 0.07 kPa. Different interfaces affected accuracy markedly, and repeatability was affected when an inhomogeneous interface was used. The study shows that the errors associated with interface pressure measurement systems can be substantial, and can vary from one system to another.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical engineering","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 344-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0141-5425(93)90014-P","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of interface pressure measurement systems\",\"authors\":\"V. Allen , D.W. Ryan , N. Lomax , A. Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0141-5425(93)90014-P\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Interface pressure measurement is needed to assess beds designed to prevent pressure sores, so it is therefore important to establish the accuracy of interface pressure measuring systems. In this study, the Talley SA500 pressure evaluator (with 28 mm and 100 mm sensor pads), the DIPE (with 100 mm sensor pad), and a water-filled bladder system (with 0.1 ml and 0.3 ml water) were assessed. Measurement errors were evaluated using a loading system with pressures up to 7.4 kPa (55 mm Hg) in steps of 0.9 kPa (6.9 mm Hg). All systems tested over-measured interface pressure, the error being approximately linearly proportional to the loading pressure. The repeatability for a given system was approximately constant. The mean error (± SD) (%) and repeatability (kPa) for the systems were: 28 mm Talley 12 ± 1%, ± 0.07 kPa; 100 mm Talley 15 ± 1%, ± 0.07 kPa; DIPE 27 ± 3%, ± 0.12 kPa; 0.1 ml water bladder 17 ± 1%, ± 0.13 kPa; 0.3 ml water bladder 26 ± 3%, ± 0.07 kPa. Different interfaces affected accuracy markedly, and repeatability was affected when an inhomogeneous interface was used. The study shows that the errors associated with interface pressure measurement systems can be substantial, and can vary from one system to another.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical engineering\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 344-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0141-5425(93)90014-P\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014154259390014P\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014154259390014P","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52
摘要
为了评估防止压疮的设计,需要进行界面压力测量,因此建立界面压力测量系统的准确性非常重要。在本研究中,评估了Talley SA500压力评估器(配有28 mm和100 mm传感器垫)、DIPE(配有100 mm传感器垫)和充水膀胱系统(配有0.1 ml和0.3 ml水)。测量误差评估使用加载系统,压力高达7.4 kPa (55 mm Hg),步骤为0.9 kPa (6.9 mm Hg)。所有被测系统都过测界面压力,误差与加载压力近似成线性关系。给定系统的重复性几乎是恒定的。系统的平均误差(±SD)(%)和重复性(kPa)分别为:28 mm Talley 12±1%,±0.07 kPa;100mm Talley 15±1%,±0.07 kPa;DIPE 27±3%,±0.12 kPa;0.1 ml水膀胱17±1%,±0.13 kPa;0.3 ml水膀胱26±3%,±0.07 kPa。不同的界面对准确度有显著影响,使用非均匀界面时影响重复性。研究表明,与界面压力测量系统相关的误差可能很大,并且可能因系统而异。
Accuracy of interface pressure measurement systems
Interface pressure measurement is needed to assess beds designed to prevent pressure sores, so it is therefore important to establish the accuracy of interface pressure measuring systems. In this study, the Talley SA500 pressure evaluator (with 28 mm and 100 mm sensor pads), the DIPE (with 100 mm sensor pad), and a water-filled bladder system (with 0.1 ml and 0.3 ml water) were assessed. Measurement errors were evaluated using a loading system with pressures up to 7.4 kPa (55 mm Hg) in steps of 0.9 kPa (6.9 mm Hg). All systems tested over-measured interface pressure, the error being approximately linearly proportional to the loading pressure. The repeatability for a given system was approximately constant. The mean error (± SD) (%) and repeatability (kPa) for the systems were: 28 mm Talley 12 ± 1%, ± 0.07 kPa; 100 mm Talley 15 ± 1%, ± 0.07 kPa; DIPE 27 ± 3%, ± 0.12 kPa; 0.1 ml water bladder 17 ± 1%, ± 0.13 kPa; 0.3 ml water bladder 26 ± 3%, ± 0.07 kPa. Different interfaces affected accuracy markedly, and repeatability was affected when an inhomogeneous interface was used. The study shows that the errors associated with interface pressure measurement systems can be substantial, and can vary from one system to another.