用电导法得到的体积轮廓

M.C. Herrera, M.E. Valentinuzzi, J.M. Olivera
{"title":"用电导法得到的体积轮廓","authors":"M.C. Herrera,&nbsp;M.E. Valentinuzzi,&nbsp;J.M. Olivera","doi":"10.1016/0141-5425(93)90001-F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One problem faced by intracardiac conductance volumetry is the non-uniform distribution of the injected current. Salo, in 1989, proposed a method to correct this undesirable effect. The objective here is to test Salo's method in known volumes of simple geometry by obtaining volume profiles. A plastic rod with 15 metallic rings simulated the conductance catheter. Five sections were used for the resistance measurements employing the upper electrode as fixed current source and the lowest one as the shifting source. This is part of Salo's procedure. The source-to-section distance was measured from the moving source to the section (linear definition) or using the equivalent distance concept (Salo's). Thereafter, each sectional resistance set of values was plotted as a function of the inverse of the source-to-section distance (either definition) elevated to an empirical exponent k to obtain the corrected sectional resistance by extrapolation back to zero of the regression line, i.e., a value produced by a source theoretically placed at infinity. In addition, a mathematical analysis was attempted, searching for an optimum k based on minimum volume error. The best volume profiles for two cylinders and a frustum were obtained with k = 2 using the linear definition of distance (errors of − 3.49%, − 1.25% and − 3.65%, respectively). Moreover, the frustum angle was determined within 0.4° (2.7%) of the real value. The theoretical analysis led to an inverse logarithmic relationship between the exponent k and the source-to-section distance. In conclusion: (1) The linear definition of source-to-section distance applying Salo's correction with k = 2 produced the smallest errors, both in volume and angle estimations; (2) there is no optimum k; (3) for very large distance, k tends to a low value (about 0.8); (4) for heart sizes, k = 2.1 can be suggested for all sections.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75992,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical engineering","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 267-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0141-5425(93)90001-F","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volume profiles obtained by a conductimetric method\",\"authors\":\"M.C. Herrera,&nbsp;M.E. Valentinuzzi,&nbsp;J.M. Olivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0141-5425(93)90001-F\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>One problem faced by intracardiac conductance volumetry is the non-uniform distribution of the injected current. Salo, in 1989, proposed a method to correct this undesirable effect. The objective here is to test Salo's method in known volumes of simple geometry by obtaining volume profiles. A plastic rod with 15 metallic rings simulated the conductance catheter. Five sections were used for the resistance measurements employing the upper electrode as fixed current source and the lowest one as the shifting source. This is part of Salo's procedure. The source-to-section distance was measured from the moving source to the section (linear definition) or using the equivalent distance concept (Salo's). Thereafter, each sectional resistance set of values was plotted as a function of the inverse of the source-to-section distance (either definition) elevated to an empirical exponent k to obtain the corrected sectional resistance by extrapolation back to zero of the regression line, i.e., a value produced by a source theoretically placed at infinity. In addition, a mathematical analysis was attempted, searching for an optimum k based on minimum volume error. The best volume profiles for two cylinders and a frustum were obtained with k = 2 using the linear definition of distance (errors of − 3.49%, − 1.25% and − 3.65%, respectively). Moreover, the frustum angle was determined within 0.4° (2.7%) of the real value. The theoretical analysis led to an inverse logarithmic relationship between the exponent k and the source-to-section distance. In conclusion: (1) The linear definition of source-to-section distance applying Salo's correction with k = 2 produced the smallest errors, both in volume and angle estimations; (2) there is no optimum k; (3) for very large distance, k tends to a low value (about 0.8); (4) for heart sizes, k = 2.1 can be suggested for all sections.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical engineering\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 267-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0141-5425(93)90001-F\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014154259390001F\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014154259390001F","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

心内电导容积法面临的一个问题是注射电流的不均匀分布。萨洛在1989年提出了一种纠正这种不良影响的方法。这里的目标是通过获得体积轮廓,在已知的简单几何体积中测试Salo的方法。一个带有15个金属环的塑料棒模拟了导电导管。电阻测量采用五段,上电极为固定电流源,下电极为移动电流源。这是萨洛手术的一部分。源到剖面的距离是从移动源到剖面(线性定义)或使用等效距离概念(Salo’s)来测量的。此后,将每个截面电阻集的值绘制为源到截面距离(任一定义)的反比的函数,将其提升到经验指数k,通过外推回回归线的零来获得校正的截面电阻,即理论上放置在无穷远处的源产生的值。此外,还尝试了数学分析,在最小体积误差的基础上寻找最优k。在k = 2的条件下,利用距离的线性定义(误差分别为- 3.49%,- 1.25%和- 3.65%),得到了两个圆柱体和一个截锥体的最佳体积轮廓。测得的截锥角在实际值的0.4°(2.7%)以内。理论分析得出指数k与源段距离成反对数关系。综上所述:(1)采用k = 2的Salo校正的源到剖面距离线性定义在体积和角度估计上误差最小;(2)不存在最优k;(3)对于非常大的距离,k趋于低值(约0.8);(4)对于心脏大小,所有截面均建议k = 2.1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volume profiles obtained by a conductimetric method

One problem faced by intracardiac conductance volumetry is the non-uniform distribution of the injected current. Salo, in 1989, proposed a method to correct this undesirable effect. The objective here is to test Salo's method in known volumes of simple geometry by obtaining volume profiles. A plastic rod with 15 metallic rings simulated the conductance catheter. Five sections were used for the resistance measurements employing the upper electrode as fixed current source and the lowest one as the shifting source. This is part of Salo's procedure. The source-to-section distance was measured from the moving source to the section (linear definition) or using the equivalent distance concept (Salo's). Thereafter, each sectional resistance set of values was plotted as a function of the inverse of the source-to-section distance (either definition) elevated to an empirical exponent k to obtain the corrected sectional resistance by extrapolation back to zero of the regression line, i.e., a value produced by a source theoretically placed at infinity. In addition, a mathematical analysis was attempted, searching for an optimum k based on minimum volume error. The best volume profiles for two cylinders and a frustum were obtained with k = 2 using the linear definition of distance (errors of − 3.49%, − 1.25% and − 3.65%, respectively). Moreover, the frustum angle was determined within 0.4° (2.7%) of the real value. The theoretical analysis led to an inverse logarithmic relationship between the exponent k and the source-to-section distance. In conclusion: (1) The linear definition of source-to-section distance applying Salo's correction with k = 2 produced the smallest errors, both in volume and angle estimations; (2) there is no optimum k; (3) for very large distance, k tends to a low value (about 0.8); (4) for heart sizes, k = 2.1 can be suggested for all sections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信