{"title":"舟状骨骨折的影像学诊断:两视图是否足够?","authors":"C Bola Taiwo, N D Grunshaw","doi":"10.1136/emj.10.2.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standard radiological diagnosis of scaphoid fractures involves four views of the wrist PA, lateral and two obliques. This amount of irradiation may be unnecessary, and previous authors have claimed that two views, Stecher (1937) (PA with 300 angulation towards the elbow giving an elongated view of scaphoid) and lateral, are of equal, or better, diagnostic accuracy. This study was performed to test the authenticity of this claim.","PeriodicalId":77009,"journal":{"name":"Archives of emergency medicine","volume":"10 2","pages":"112-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.10.2.112","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiological diagnosis of scaphoid fractures: are two views enough?\",\"authors\":\"C Bola Taiwo, N D Grunshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emj.10.2.112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standard radiological diagnosis of scaphoid fractures involves four views of the wrist PA, lateral and two obliques. This amount of irradiation may be unnecessary, and previous authors have claimed that two views, Stecher (1937) (PA with 300 angulation towards the elbow giving an elongated view of scaphoid) and lateral, are of equal, or better, diagnostic accuracy. This study was performed to test the authenticity of this claim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"112-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emj.10.2.112\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.10.2.112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.10.2.112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Radiological diagnosis of scaphoid fractures: are two views enough?
Standard radiological diagnosis of scaphoid fractures involves four views of the wrist PA, lateral and two obliques. This amount of irradiation may be unnecessary, and previous authors have claimed that two views, Stecher (1937) (PA with 300 angulation towards the elbow giving an elongated view of scaphoid) and lateral, are of equal, or better, diagnostic accuracy. This study was performed to test the authenticity of this claim.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
