全局心肌缺血保护心肌免受随后的局部缺血。

Cardioscience Pub Date : 1993-12-01
D M Walker, J M Walker, D M Yellon
{"title":"全局心肌缺血保护心肌免受随后的局部缺血。","authors":"D M Walker,&nbsp;J M Walker,&nbsp;D M Yellon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many investigators use in vitro models of global ischemia to examine the effects of preconditioning, often with recovery of contractile function as the end-point. Such models are relevant to myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. However, there is still debate as to whether preconditioning preserves ventricular contraction secondary to limitation of infarction or by a direct effect on stunning. Since infarct size is the original end-point against which protection by preconditioning is measured, our aims were, first, to validate global ischemic preconditioning by measuring infarct size after subsequent regional ischemia and, second, to correlate limitation of infarct size with mechanical function. After stabilization, seven isolated buffer perfused rabbit hearts were subjected to 5 minutes of global \"no-flow\" ischemia followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion (\"global preconditioning\"). Seven control hearts were allowed to stabilize for an additional 15 minutes at constant flow. Subsequently, regional ischemia was induced in both groups for 45 minutes followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. Left ventricular and coronary perfusion pressures were measured throughout. Myocardial infarct size was measured using triphenyltetrazolium staining and expressed as a percentage of the area at risk outlined with fluorescent microspheres. The ratio of infarct to risk zone was reduced from 47.6 +/- 7.3% in control hearts to 16.4 +/- 5.4% (p = 0.005) in preconditioned hearts, confirming the efficacy of global preconditioning. In addition, preconditioning led to a better preservation of systolic function, which correlated significantly with limitation of infarct size (r = 0.75, p = 0.002). Global preconditioning may account for the successful use of cross-clamp fibrillation during cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9629,"journal":{"name":"Cardioscience","volume":"4 4","pages":"263-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global myocardial ischemia protects the myocardium from subsequent regional ischemia.\",\"authors\":\"D M Walker,&nbsp;J M Walker,&nbsp;D M Yellon\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many investigators use in vitro models of global ischemia to examine the effects of preconditioning, often with recovery of contractile function as the end-point. Such models are relevant to myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. However, there is still debate as to whether preconditioning preserves ventricular contraction secondary to limitation of infarction or by a direct effect on stunning. Since infarct size is the original end-point against which protection by preconditioning is measured, our aims were, first, to validate global ischemic preconditioning by measuring infarct size after subsequent regional ischemia and, second, to correlate limitation of infarct size with mechanical function. After stabilization, seven isolated buffer perfused rabbit hearts were subjected to 5 minutes of global \\\"no-flow\\\" ischemia followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion (\\\"global preconditioning\\\"). Seven control hearts were allowed to stabilize for an additional 15 minutes at constant flow. Subsequently, regional ischemia was induced in both groups for 45 minutes followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. Left ventricular and coronary perfusion pressures were measured throughout. Myocardial infarct size was measured using triphenyltetrazolium staining and expressed as a percentage of the area at risk outlined with fluorescent microspheres. The ratio of infarct to risk zone was reduced from 47.6 +/- 7.3% in control hearts to 16.4 +/- 5.4% (p = 0.005) in preconditioned hearts, confirming the efficacy of global preconditioning. In addition, preconditioning led to a better preservation of systolic function, which correlated significantly with limitation of infarct size (r = 0.75, p = 0.002). Global preconditioning may account for the successful use of cross-clamp fibrillation during cardiac surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardioscience\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"263-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardioscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardioscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多研究者使用体外全脑缺血模型来检验预适应的效果,通常以收缩功能的恢复为终点。这些模型与心脏手术过程中的心肌保护有关。然而,关于预适应是否保留继发于梗塞限制的心室收缩,或通过对昏迷的直接影响,仍然存在争议。由于梗死面积是测量预适应保护作用的原始终点,我们的目标是,首先,通过测量随后局部缺血后的梗死面积来验证全局缺血预适应,其次,将梗死面积限制与机械功能联系起来。稳定后,7颗分离的缓冲灌注兔心脏进行5分钟的全面“无血流”缺血,然后进行10分钟的再灌注(“全面预处理”)。7颗对照心脏在恒定流量下再稳定15分钟。随后,两组小鼠局部缺血45分钟,再灌注2小时。测量左室和冠状动脉灌注压。心肌梗死面积用三苯基四唑染色测定,并用荧光微球表示为危险区域的百分比。梗死与危险区的比率从对照组的47.6 +/- 7.3%降至预处理心脏的16.4 +/- 5.4% (p = 0.005),证实了全面预处理的有效性。此外,预适应能更好地保存收缩功能,这与梗死面积的限制显著相关(r = 0.75, p = 0.002)。整体预处理可能是心脏手术中成功使用交叉钳状颤动的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global myocardial ischemia protects the myocardium from subsequent regional ischemia.

Many investigators use in vitro models of global ischemia to examine the effects of preconditioning, often with recovery of contractile function as the end-point. Such models are relevant to myocardial protection during cardiac surgery. However, there is still debate as to whether preconditioning preserves ventricular contraction secondary to limitation of infarction or by a direct effect on stunning. Since infarct size is the original end-point against which protection by preconditioning is measured, our aims were, first, to validate global ischemic preconditioning by measuring infarct size after subsequent regional ischemia and, second, to correlate limitation of infarct size with mechanical function. After stabilization, seven isolated buffer perfused rabbit hearts were subjected to 5 minutes of global "no-flow" ischemia followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion ("global preconditioning"). Seven control hearts were allowed to stabilize for an additional 15 minutes at constant flow. Subsequently, regional ischemia was induced in both groups for 45 minutes followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. Left ventricular and coronary perfusion pressures were measured throughout. Myocardial infarct size was measured using triphenyltetrazolium staining and expressed as a percentage of the area at risk outlined with fluorescent microspheres. The ratio of infarct to risk zone was reduced from 47.6 +/- 7.3% in control hearts to 16.4 +/- 5.4% (p = 0.005) in preconditioned hearts, confirming the efficacy of global preconditioning. In addition, preconditioning led to a better preservation of systolic function, which correlated significantly with limitation of infarct size (r = 0.75, p = 0.002). Global preconditioning may account for the successful use of cross-clamp fibrillation during cardiac surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信