{"title":"CEA、TPA、ca15 -3、ca549和TPS在转移性乳腺癌监测中的价值","authors":"A Nicolini, M Ferdeghini, C Colizzi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monitoring the response to treatment in relapsed breast cancer patients is one of the chief uses of tumor markers. Thus far the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA)-breast cancer associated antigen 115 D8/DF3 (CA 15-3) association has been routinely used to follow-up breast cancer patients. We have found that TPA reflects the response to treatment much better than CEA and slightly better than CA 15-3. Recently carcinoma associated antigen 549 (CA 549) and tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) have been reported to be highly sensitive tumor markers for breast cancer. TPS is claimed to be particularly suitable for monitoring the response to treatment because of its more specific assessment of proliferation activity. Therefore, in 13 relapsed patients with prolonged follow-up and detailed clinical-instrumental information, the mean percentage of samples with high CEA, TPA, and CA 15-3 values and their expressions were compared with those of CA 549 and TPS. All markers were also evaluated in terms of their correspondence with the evolution of disease. The correspondence with clinical-instrumental behaviour was scored absent (0), poor (1), good (2) and very good (3) by three different observers. Other more suitable associations than those already used were also investigated. It was found that CA 15-3 and CA 549 were expressed more often (92%) than TPS (85%), TPA (60%) and CEA (46%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear biology and medicine (Turin, Italy : 1991)","volume":"37 3","pages":"126-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of CEA, TPA, CA 15-3, CA 549 and TPS in the monitoring of metastatic breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"A Nicolini, M Ferdeghini, C Colizzi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monitoring the response to treatment in relapsed breast cancer patients is one of the chief uses of tumor markers. Thus far the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA)-breast cancer associated antigen 115 D8/DF3 (CA 15-3) association has been routinely used to follow-up breast cancer patients. We have found that TPA reflects the response to treatment much better than CEA and slightly better than CA 15-3. Recently carcinoma associated antigen 549 (CA 549) and tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) have been reported to be highly sensitive tumor markers for breast cancer. TPS is claimed to be particularly suitable for monitoring the response to treatment because of its more specific assessment of proliferation activity. Therefore, in 13 relapsed patients with prolonged follow-up and detailed clinical-instrumental information, the mean percentage of samples with high CEA, TPA, and CA 15-3 values and their expressions were compared with those of CA 549 and TPS. All markers were also evaluated in terms of their correspondence with the evolution of disease. The correspondence with clinical-instrumental behaviour was scored absent (0), poor (1), good (2) and very good (3) by three different observers. Other more suitable associations than those already used were also investigated. It was found that CA 15-3 and CA 549 were expressed more often (92%) than TPS (85%), TPA (60%) and CEA (46%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nuclear biology and medicine (Turin, Italy : 1991)\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"126-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nuclear biology and medicine (Turin, Italy : 1991)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear biology and medicine (Turin, Italy : 1991)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
监测复发乳腺癌患者对治疗的反应是肿瘤标志物的主要用途之一。到目前为止,癌胚抗原(CEA)-组织多肽抗原(TPA)-乳腺癌相关抗原115 D8/DF3 (CA 15-3)关联已被常规用于乳腺癌患者的随访。我们发现TPA对治疗的反应远好于CEA,略好于ca15 -3。近年来,癌相关抗原549 (CA 549)和组织多肽特异性抗原(TPS)被报道为乳腺癌高度敏感的肿瘤标志物。据称,TPS特别适合监测对治疗的反应,因为它更具体地评估增殖活性。因此,在13例随访时间较长且临床仪器资料详细的复发患者中,比较CEA、TPA、CA 15-3高值样本及其表达的平均百分比与CA 549和TPS的比较。所有标记物也根据其与疾病演变的对应关系进行评估。与临床仪器行为的对应关系由三位不同的观察者评分为不存在(0),差(1),好(2)和非常好(3)。还研究了其他比已经使用的更合适的关联。CA 15-3和CA 549的表达频率(92%)高于TPS(85%)、TPA(60%)和CEA(46%)。(摘要删节250字)
Evaluation of CEA, TPA, CA 15-3, CA 549 and TPS in the monitoring of metastatic breast cancer.
Monitoring the response to treatment in relapsed breast cancer patients is one of the chief uses of tumor markers. Thus far the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA)-breast cancer associated antigen 115 D8/DF3 (CA 15-3) association has been routinely used to follow-up breast cancer patients. We have found that TPA reflects the response to treatment much better than CEA and slightly better than CA 15-3. Recently carcinoma associated antigen 549 (CA 549) and tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) have been reported to be highly sensitive tumor markers for breast cancer. TPS is claimed to be particularly suitable for monitoring the response to treatment because of its more specific assessment of proliferation activity. Therefore, in 13 relapsed patients with prolonged follow-up and detailed clinical-instrumental information, the mean percentage of samples with high CEA, TPA, and CA 15-3 values and their expressions were compared with those of CA 549 and TPS. All markers were also evaluated in terms of their correspondence with the evolution of disease. The correspondence with clinical-instrumental behaviour was scored absent (0), poor (1), good (2) and very good (3) by three different observers. Other more suitable associations than those already used were also investigated. It was found that CA 15-3 and CA 549 were expressed more often (92%) than TPS (85%), TPA (60%) and CEA (46%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)