牙釉质预处理剂对树脂复合材料附着力的影响。

T Hayakawa, K Nemoto, K Horie
{"title":"牙釉质预处理剂对树脂复合材料附着力的影响。","authors":"T Hayakawa,&nbsp;K Nemoto,&nbsp;K Horie","doi":"10.2334/josnusd1959.36.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aqueous solutions of methacryloyl tyrosine amide (MTYA), glyceryl methacrylate (GM), glutaraldehyde and succinic acid were prepared and their effectiveness as pretreatment reagents was evaluated by measuring the tensile bond strengths between resin composite and polished enamel. Pretreatment of polished enamel with MTYA.GM.S3 (A: 6% MTYA + 70% GM aqueous solution, B: 3% succinic acid aqueous solution) gave bond strengths of about 7 MPa, whereas pretreatment with MTYA.G.GM.S3 (A: 6% MTYA + 70% GM aqueous solution, B: 3% succinic acid + 2% glutaraldehyde aqueous solution) gave values of about 5 MPa. The mean bond strengths of each after 60 s of scrubbing with MTYA.GM.S3 or by MTYA.G.GM.S3 were raised to about 9.5 MPa, and the type of bond failure was fracture of the bonding agent. Although there were no resin tags, it was found that resin composite was able to adhere to polished enamel without acid etching.</p>","PeriodicalId":22638,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry","volume":"36 1","pages":"52-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2334/josnusd1959.36.52","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of pretreatment reagent for enamel on the adhesion of resin composite.\",\"authors\":\"T Hayakawa,&nbsp;K Nemoto,&nbsp;K Horie\",\"doi\":\"10.2334/josnusd1959.36.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aqueous solutions of methacryloyl tyrosine amide (MTYA), glyceryl methacrylate (GM), glutaraldehyde and succinic acid were prepared and their effectiveness as pretreatment reagents was evaluated by measuring the tensile bond strengths between resin composite and polished enamel. Pretreatment of polished enamel with MTYA.GM.S3 (A: 6% MTYA + 70% GM aqueous solution, B: 3% succinic acid aqueous solution) gave bond strengths of about 7 MPa, whereas pretreatment with MTYA.G.GM.S3 (A: 6% MTYA + 70% GM aqueous solution, B: 3% succinic acid + 2% glutaraldehyde aqueous solution) gave values of about 5 MPa. The mean bond strengths of each after 60 s of scrubbing with MTYA.GM.S3 or by MTYA.G.GM.S3 were raised to about 9.5 MPa, and the type of bond failure was fracture of the bonding agent. Although there were no resin tags, it was found that resin composite was able to adhere to polished enamel without acid etching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"52-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2334/josnusd1959.36.52\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd1959.36.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd1959.36.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制备了甲基丙烯酰酪氨酸酰胺(MTYA)、甲基丙烯酸甘油酯(GM)、戊二醛和琥珀酸的水溶液,并通过测定树脂复合材料与抛光釉质的拉伸结合强度来评价其作为预处理试剂的效果。MTYA.GM预处理抛光牙釉质的研究。S3 (A: 6% MTYA + 70% GM水溶液,B: 3%琥珀酸水溶液)的结合强度约为7 MPa,而用mtya.g.g GM预处理。S3 (A: 6% MTYA + 70% GM水溶液,B: 3%琥珀酸+ 2%戊二醛水溶液)的取值约为5 MPa。用MTYA.GM洗涤60 s后的平均粘结强度。S3或mtya.g.g gm。S3升高至9.5 MPa左右,粘结破坏类型为粘结剂断裂。虽然没有树脂标签,但发现树脂复合材料能够粘附在抛光的珐琅上,而不需要酸蚀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of pretreatment reagent for enamel on the adhesion of resin composite.

Aqueous solutions of methacryloyl tyrosine amide (MTYA), glyceryl methacrylate (GM), glutaraldehyde and succinic acid were prepared and their effectiveness as pretreatment reagents was evaluated by measuring the tensile bond strengths between resin composite and polished enamel. Pretreatment of polished enamel with MTYA.GM.S3 (A: 6% MTYA + 70% GM aqueous solution, B: 3% succinic acid aqueous solution) gave bond strengths of about 7 MPa, whereas pretreatment with MTYA.G.GM.S3 (A: 6% MTYA + 70% GM aqueous solution, B: 3% succinic acid + 2% glutaraldehyde aqueous solution) gave values of about 5 MPa. The mean bond strengths of each after 60 s of scrubbing with MTYA.GM.S3 or by MTYA.G.GM.S3 were raised to about 9.5 MPa, and the type of bond failure was fracture of the bonding agent. Although there were no resin tags, it was found that resin composite was able to adhere to polished enamel without acid etching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信