护理研究文章中报告同意率的发生率。

S Douglas, J Briones, C Chronister
{"title":"护理研究文章中报告同意率的发生率。","authors":"S Douglas,&nbsp;J Briones,&nbsp;C Chronister","doi":"10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study described the incidence of reporting consent rates (CRs) in nursing research articles, ascertained the mean CR for nursing research articles, ascertained differences between those studies that reported a CR and those that did not report a CR, and compared studies that used clinical populations to studies that used nonclinical populations. Research articles (371) from three nursing research journals were examined. Results showed that: (a) 40.7 percent of articles reported a CR, (b) the mean CR was 71.8 percent, (c) 41.1 percent reported inadequate CRs, (d) studies reporting a CR differed from those that did not on five of nine variables, and (e) studies employing clinical populations reported higher consent rates than did studies that employed nonclinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":77169,"journal":{"name":"Image--the journal of nursing scholarship","volume":"26 1","pages":"35-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The incidence of reporting consent rates in nursing research articles.\",\"authors\":\"S Douglas,&nbsp;J Briones,&nbsp;C Chronister\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study described the incidence of reporting consent rates (CRs) in nursing research articles, ascertained the mean CR for nursing research articles, ascertained differences between those studies that reported a CR and those that did not report a CR, and compared studies that used clinical populations to studies that used nonclinical populations. Research articles (371) from three nursing research journals were examined. Results showed that: (a) 40.7 percent of articles reported a CR, (b) the mean CR was 71.8 percent, (c) 41.1 percent reported inadequate CRs, (d) studies reporting a CR differed from those that did not on five of nine variables, and (e) studies employing clinical populations reported higher consent rates than did studies that employed nonclinical populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Image--the journal of nursing scholarship\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"35-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Image--the journal of nursing scholarship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Image--the journal of nursing scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00291.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究描述了护理研究文章中报告同意率(CR)的发生率,确定了护理研究文章的平均CR,确定了报告CR和未报告CR的研究之间的差异,并比较了使用临床人群的研究和使用非临床人群的研究。研究论文(371篇)来自三个护理研究期刊。结果显示:(a) 40.7%的文章报告了CR, (b)平均CR为71.8%,(c) 41.1%的文章报告了CR不足,(d)报告CR的研究与没有报告CR的研究在9个变量中的5个变量上有所不同,(e)使用临床人群的研究报告的同意率高于使用非临床人群的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The incidence of reporting consent rates in nursing research articles.

The study described the incidence of reporting consent rates (CRs) in nursing research articles, ascertained the mean CR for nursing research articles, ascertained differences between those studies that reported a CR and those that did not report a CR, and compared studies that used clinical populations to studies that used nonclinical populations. Research articles (371) from three nursing research journals were examined. Results showed that: (a) 40.7 percent of articles reported a CR, (b) the mean CR was 71.8 percent, (c) 41.1 percent reported inadequate CRs, (d) studies reporting a CR differed from those that did not on five of nine variables, and (e) studies employing clinical populations reported higher consent rates than did studies that employed nonclinical populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信