{"title":"ha涂层植入物:是否有保证?","authors":"J L Lozada, R A James, M Boskovic","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite anecdotal reports that challenge hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implant survivability, the experience in the placement of these implants over 9 years at Loma Linda University School of Dentistry has been favorable. The results of these implant placements are presented and analyzed in this article. After 7 years, the survival rate of HA-coated custom and stock blade-form implants is 97%. At 5 years, the survival rate for all upper HA-coated root form implants is 98%, and for all HA-coated implants placed in the lower jaw it is 99%. For implants placed in maxillary type 4 bone, there was a 32.6% failure rate among uncoated implants, but a rate of 14.9% in HA-coated implants. The causes of implant failure are often related to factors other than the type of implant, such as iatrogenic factors and poor oral hygiene.</p>","PeriodicalId":77696,"journal":{"name":"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement","volume":" 15","pages":"S539-43; quiz S565-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HA-coated implants: warranted or not?\",\"authors\":\"J L Lozada, R A James, M Boskovic\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite anecdotal reports that challenge hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implant survivability, the experience in the placement of these implants over 9 years at Loma Linda University School of Dentistry has been favorable. The results of these implant placements are presented and analyzed in this article. After 7 years, the survival rate of HA-coated custom and stock blade-form implants is 97%. At 5 years, the survival rate for all upper HA-coated root form implants is 98%, and for all HA-coated implants placed in the lower jaw it is 99%. For implants placed in maxillary type 4 bone, there was a 32.6% failure rate among uncoated implants, but a rate of 14.9% in HA-coated implants. The causes of implant failure are often related to factors other than the type of implant, such as iatrogenic factors and poor oral hygiene.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement\",\"volume\":\" 15\",\"pages\":\"S539-43; quiz S565-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium (Newtown, Pa.). Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Despite anecdotal reports that challenge hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implant survivability, the experience in the placement of these implants over 9 years at Loma Linda University School of Dentistry has been favorable. The results of these implant placements are presented and analyzed in this article. After 7 years, the survival rate of HA-coated custom and stock blade-form implants is 97%. At 5 years, the survival rate for all upper HA-coated root form implants is 98%, and for all HA-coated implants placed in the lower jaw it is 99%. For implants placed in maxillary type 4 bone, there was a 32.6% failure rate among uncoated implants, but a rate of 14.9% in HA-coated implants. The causes of implant failure are often related to factors other than the type of implant, such as iatrogenic factors and poor oral hygiene.