最大雄激素阻断在晚期前列腺癌中的作用。

L Denis
{"title":"最大雄激素阻断在晚期前列腺癌中的作用。","authors":"L Denis","doi":"10.1002/pros.2990250707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Androgen ablation by bilateral orchiectomy or by the administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists has become standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer. However, serum levels of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) remain at about 40% of the precastration levels due to the conversion of the adrenal androgens. Maximal androgen blockade (MAB) aims to block the stimulatory action of this adrenal-derived DHT by adding antiandrogens to surgical or medical castration. Some of the largest and best controlled randomized trials in Europe and the United States have shown statistically better progression-free survival, overall survival, and survival from death by prostate cancer with MAB than with monotherapy with a GnRH agonist or with bilateral orchiectomy. Trial 30853 of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) compared MAB using a combination of goserelin subcutaneous depot (Zoladex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK) and flutamide with bilateral orchiectomy. Some other published trials did not find the differences revealed by EORTC 30853, however, and so an overview or meta-analysis of trials on the effects of MAB was organized jointly by the American Cancer Society, the Urological Group of the EORTC, and the International Prostate Health Council. Preliminary results on some of the 23 trials included in the meta-analysis showed an advantage of the GnRH agonist therapy in combination with an anti-androgen, particularly in time to progression. If time to progression is viewed as improved quality of life due to the absence of symptoms, a net result in favor of the combination therapy is noted. The MAB trials, using flutamide as the antiandrogen, also showed a small but distinct improvement in survival with the combination treatment. An emphasis on prognostic factors allows treatment decisions to be reached more easily.</p>","PeriodicalId":77436,"journal":{"name":"The Prostate. Supplement","volume":"5 ","pages":"17-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pros.2990250707","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of maximal androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"L Denis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.2990250707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Androgen ablation by bilateral orchiectomy or by the administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists has become standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer. However, serum levels of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) remain at about 40% of the precastration levels due to the conversion of the adrenal androgens. Maximal androgen blockade (MAB) aims to block the stimulatory action of this adrenal-derived DHT by adding antiandrogens to surgical or medical castration. Some of the largest and best controlled randomized trials in Europe and the United States have shown statistically better progression-free survival, overall survival, and survival from death by prostate cancer with MAB than with monotherapy with a GnRH agonist or with bilateral orchiectomy. Trial 30853 of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) compared MAB using a combination of goserelin subcutaneous depot (Zoladex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK) and flutamide with bilateral orchiectomy. Some other published trials did not find the differences revealed by EORTC 30853, however, and so an overview or meta-analysis of trials on the effects of MAB was organized jointly by the American Cancer Society, the Urological Group of the EORTC, and the International Prostate Health Council. Preliminary results on some of the 23 trials included in the meta-analysis showed an advantage of the GnRH agonist therapy in combination with an anti-androgen, particularly in time to progression. If time to progression is viewed as improved quality of life due to the absence of symptoms, a net result in favor of the combination therapy is noted. The MAB trials, using flutamide as the antiandrogen, also showed a small but distinct improvement in survival with the combination treatment. An emphasis on prognostic factors allows treatment decisions to be reached more easily.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Prostate. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"17-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pros.2990250707\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Prostate. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.2990250707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Prostate. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.2990250707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

双侧睾丸切除术或促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂治疗雄激素消融已成为晚期前列腺癌的标准治疗方法。然而,由于肾上腺雄激素的转化,血清双氢睾酮(DHT)水平保持在去势前水平的40%左右。最大雄激素阻断(MAB)旨在通过在手术或医学阉割中添加抗雄激素来阻断肾上腺源性DHT的刺激作用。欧洲和美国一些规模最大、效果最好的随机对照试验显示,单抗治疗的无进展生存期、总生存期和前列腺癌死亡生存率优于单抗治疗和GnRH激动剂或双侧睾丸切除术。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)的试验30853比较了单抗与戈舍林皮下贮存(Zoladex;Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK)和氟他胺双侧睾丸切除术。然而,其他一些已发表的试验并没有发现EORTC 30853所揭示的差异,因此,美国癌症协会、EORTC泌尿科小组和国际前列腺健康理事会联合组织了一项关于MAB效果的试验综述或荟萃分析。meta分析中包含的23项试验的初步结果显示,GnRH激动剂与抗雄激素联合治疗具有优势,特别是在进展时间方面。如果将进展时间视为由于无症状而改善的生活质量,则注意到有利于联合治疗的净结果。使用氟他胺作为抗雄激素的单克隆抗体试验也显示,联合治疗对生存率有微小但明显的改善。对预后因素的重视使治疗决策更容易达成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of maximal androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer.

Androgen ablation by bilateral orchiectomy or by the administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists has become standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer. However, serum levels of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) remain at about 40% of the precastration levels due to the conversion of the adrenal androgens. Maximal androgen blockade (MAB) aims to block the stimulatory action of this adrenal-derived DHT by adding antiandrogens to surgical or medical castration. Some of the largest and best controlled randomized trials in Europe and the United States have shown statistically better progression-free survival, overall survival, and survival from death by prostate cancer with MAB than with monotherapy with a GnRH agonist or with bilateral orchiectomy. Trial 30853 of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) compared MAB using a combination of goserelin subcutaneous depot (Zoladex; Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK) and flutamide with bilateral orchiectomy. Some other published trials did not find the differences revealed by EORTC 30853, however, and so an overview or meta-analysis of trials on the effects of MAB was organized jointly by the American Cancer Society, the Urological Group of the EORTC, and the International Prostate Health Council. Preliminary results on some of the 23 trials included in the meta-analysis showed an advantage of the GnRH agonist therapy in combination with an anti-androgen, particularly in time to progression. If time to progression is viewed as improved quality of life due to the absence of symptoms, a net result in favor of the combination therapy is noted. The MAB trials, using flutamide as the antiandrogen, also showed a small but distinct improvement in survival with the combination treatment. An emphasis on prognostic factors allows treatment decisions to be reached more easily.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信