[从医院管理角度分析医疗保险住院费对医院自查结果的影响——以某高校医院出院前自查为例]。

Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse Pub Date : 1993-11-01
S S Moon
{"title":"[从医院管理角度分析医疗保险住院费对医院自查结果的影响——以某高校医院出院前自查为例]。","authors":"S S Moon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purposes of this study were to evaluate the results of the hospital self inspection with the medical insurance and to offer basic materials to the medical insurance inspection and the education of medical insurance. The study was undertaken with 4,730 cases among the total 13,810 medical insurance in patients from Jan. 1990 to Dec. 1990 at one university hospital in Pusan. The major contents of the inspection were the omission of diagnosis and medical fee, curtailment, application mistake, the rates of inclusion, subtraction and total accumulation. The data were collected using patients charts and bills. The results of the paper analysis were as follows. 1. From the pre-discharge hospital self inspection, major omission were treatment and material fee but medication fee were moderately high and high curtailment was operation fee. 2. Decreasing order of operation fee adjustment were digestive (22.4%) muscular (22%) and neuro system operation (21.4%). Majority of the medication fee adjustments were injection form of medication (95.7%). 50% of the treatment fee adjustments were composed of injection fee (27.9%) and dressing or post-operative dressing fee (22.3%). 74.7% of material costs were composed of oxygen (30.6%), blood and the blood composed materials (44.1%). 3. Pre-discharge inspection showed 6% adjustment rate, 4.3% addition and 2.1% curtailment rate. Most of the adjustment were omission (66.1%). 4. Omission were divided by event omission (92.6%) and application mistake (7.4%). The decreasing order of omission fee were operation (21.84%), treatment (18.71%) diagnosis (18.68%), medication (14.53%) and material costs (10.84%). So operation and treatment part were the major part of the total omission fee (40.55%). 5. The average omission of diagnosis were 1,800 per month.</p>","PeriodicalId":76576,"journal":{"name":"Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse","volume":"32 5","pages":"78-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Analytic study of the hospital self inspection results with the medical insurance inpatient fee from the viewpoint of the hospital management--based on one university hospital pre-discharge inspection].\",\"authors\":\"S S Moon\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purposes of this study were to evaluate the results of the hospital self inspection with the medical insurance and to offer basic materials to the medical insurance inspection and the education of medical insurance. The study was undertaken with 4,730 cases among the total 13,810 medical insurance in patients from Jan. 1990 to Dec. 1990 at one university hospital in Pusan. The major contents of the inspection were the omission of diagnosis and medical fee, curtailment, application mistake, the rates of inclusion, subtraction and total accumulation. The data were collected using patients charts and bills. The results of the paper analysis were as follows. 1. From the pre-discharge hospital self inspection, major omission were treatment and material fee but medication fee were moderately high and high curtailment was operation fee. 2. Decreasing order of operation fee adjustment were digestive (22.4%) muscular (22%) and neuro system operation (21.4%). Majority of the medication fee adjustments were injection form of medication (95.7%). 50% of the treatment fee adjustments were composed of injection fee (27.9%) and dressing or post-operative dressing fee (22.3%). 74.7% of material costs were composed of oxygen (30.6%), blood and the blood composed materials (44.1%). 3. Pre-discharge inspection showed 6% adjustment rate, 4.3% addition and 2.1% curtailment rate. Most of the adjustment were omission (66.1%). 4. Omission were divided by event omission (92.6%) and application mistake (7.4%). The decreasing order of omission fee were operation (21.84%), treatment (18.71%) diagnosis (18.68%), medication (14.53%) and material costs (10.84%). So operation and treatment part were the major part of the total omission fee (40.55%). 5. The average omission of diagnosis were 1,800 per month.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"78-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taehan kanho. The Korean nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价医疗保险医院自查的效果,为医疗保险自查和医疗保险教育提供基础资料。该研究是在1990年1月至1990年12月期间在釜山一所大学医院对13,810名医疗保险患者中的4,730例进行的。检查的主要内容是遗漏的诊断和医疗费用,缩短,应用程序的错误,包容的利率,减法和总积累。数据是通过病人的病历和账单收集的。本文的分析结果如下:1. 从出院前医院自查来看,主要漏报为治疗费和材料费,药费中等偏高,手术费较高。2. 手术费用调整的降序依次为消化(22.4%)、肌肉(22%)和神经系统(21.4%)。药费调整以注射用药为主(95.7%)。50%的治疗费用调整由注射费(27.9%)和敷料或术后敷料费(22.3%)组成。氧气(30.6%)、血液及血液组成的材料(44.1%)占材料成本的74.7%。3.排放前检查调整率为6%,加注率为4.3%,弃风率为2.1%。调整以遗漏居多(66.1%)。4. 遗漏分为事件遗漏(92.6%)和应用错误(7.4%)。漏报费用由高到低依次为手术(21.84%)、治疗(18.71%)、诊断(18.68%)、用药(14.53%)、材料费用(10.84%)。手术和治疗部分是漏报费用的主要部分(40.55%)。5. 平均每月漏诊1800例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Analytic study of the hospital self inspection results with the medical insurance inpatient fee from the viewpoint of the hospital management--based on one university hospital pre-discharge inspection].

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the results of the hospital self inspection with the medical insurance and to offer basic materials to the medical insurance inspection and the education of medical insurance. The study was undertaken with 4,730 cases among the total 13,810 medical insurance in patients from Jan. 1990 to Dec. 1990 at one university hospital in Pusan. The major contents of the inspection were the omission of diagnosis and medical fee, curtailment, application mistake, the rates of inclusion, subtraction and total accumulation. The data were collected using patients charts and bills. The results of the paper analysis were as follows. 1. From the pre-discharge hospital self inspection, major omission were treatment and material fee but medication fee were moderately high and high curtailment was operation fee. 2. Decreasing order of operation fee adjustment were digestive (22.4%) muscular (22%) and neuro system operation (21.4%). Majority of the medication fee adjustments were injection form of medication (95.7%). 50% of the treatment fee adjustments were composed of injection fee (27.9%) and dressing or post-operative dressing fee (22.3%). 74.7% of material costs were composed of oxygen (30.6%), blood and the blood composed materials (44.1%). 3. Pre-discharge inspection showed 6% adjustment rate, 4.3% addition and 2.1% curtailment rate. Most of the adjustment were omission (66.1%). 4. Omission were divided by event omission (92.6%) and application mistake (7.4%). The decreasing order of omission fee were operation (21.84%), treatment (18.71%) diagnosis (18.68%), medication (14.53%) and material costs (10.84%). So operation and treatment part were the major part of the total omission fee (40.55%). 5. The average omission of diagnosis were 1,800 per month.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信