【正确研究科学哲学的出发点——学术护理研究的观点探讨】。

Hoitotiede Pub Date : 1993-01-01
H Nieminen, P Astedt-Kurki
{"title":"【正确研究科学哲学的出发点——学术护理研究的观点探讨】。","authors":"H Nieminen,&nbsp;P Astedt-Kurki","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article starting points and methodological issues of qualitative research will be examined. Questions of phenomenology, analytic hermeneutics and so called newer hemeneutics are handled. Methodological roots of some Finnish PhD. dissertations will be identified. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss and make some clarification to conceptual diversity in studies using qualitative research methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":77161,"journal":{"name":"Hoitotiede","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Proper study of starting point in scientific philosophy--discussion of viewpoints in scholarly nursing study].\",\"authors\":\"H Nieminen,&nbsp;P Astedt-Kurki\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this article starting points and methodological issues of qualitative research will be examined. Questions of phenomenology, analytic hermeneutics and so called newer hemeneutics are handled. Methodological roots of some Finnish PhD. dissertations will be identified. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss and make some clarification to conceptual diversity in studies using qualitative research methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hoitotiede\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hoitotiede\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hoitotiede","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将探讨定性研究的出发点和方法论问题。处理现象学、分析解释学和所谓的新解释学的问题。一些芬兰博士的方法论根源。论文将被确定。本文的主要目的是对定性研究方法研究中的概念多样性进行探讨和澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Proper study of starting point in scientific philosophy--discussion of viewpoints in scholarly nursing study].

In this article starting points and methodological issues of qualitative research will be examined. Questions of phenomenology, analytic hermeneutics and so called newer hemeneutics are handled. Methodological roots of some Finnish PhD. dissertations will be identified. The main purpose of this paper is to discuss and make some clarification to conceptual diversity in studies using qualitative research methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信