M Crumeyrolle-Arias, J Latouche, P Laniece, Y Charon, H Tricoire, L Valentin, P Roux, G Mirambeau, P Leblanc, G Fillion
{"title":"GnRH受体的“原位”表征:使用两台放射成像仪并与定量放射自显影术进行比较。","authors":"M Crumeyrolle-Arias, J Latouche, P Laniece, Y Charon, H Tricoire, L Valentin, P Roux, G Mirambeau, P Leblanc, G Fillion","doi":"10.3109/10799899409066035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>New radioimagers, the HRRI (high resolution radioimager) and the Phosphorimager (phosphor screen : PS), apt to display more ample linear dose-response scale than radio-sensitive films, were tested in comparison with quantitative autoradiography (QA). GnRH receptor saturation experiments were achieved on tissue sections (rat pituitary, rat brain, human ovary) with a iodinate GnRH agonist (125I-[D-Ala6,Des-Gly10]-LH-RH Ethylamide) for determination of affinity constant (Kd). In rat pituitary, comparable results were obtained with the 3 methods (Kd: 0.4 to 0.6 nM). Discrepancies occurred in the hippocampus and in the granulosa cell layer of the preovulatory follicle, due to low resolutive (PS) or short linear dose-response (films) performances. In the hippocampus GnRH receptor affinity was under-estimated with PS (Kd: 2.3 vs 0.5 and 0.6 nM for QA and HRRI respectively). In the follicular granulosa cell layer it was over-estimated by QA (0.5 vs 50 nM for the HRRI), while PS did not allow resolution of this thin cell layer. In conclusion, the HRRI is a very powerful tool for the quantification of in situ radioligand binding (binding sites study and in situ hybridization) in very discrete areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":16948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of receptor research","volume":"14 3-4","pages":"251-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10799899409066035","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"In situ\\\" characterization of GnRH receptors: use of two radioimagers and comparison with quantitative autoradiography.\",\"authors\":\"M Crumeyrolle-Arias, J Latouche, P Laniece, Y Charon, H Tricoire, L Valentin, P Roux, G Mirambeau, P Leblanc, G Fillion\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10799899409066035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>New radioimagers, the HRRI (high resolution radioimager) and the Phosphorimager (phosphor screen : PS), apt to display more ample linear dose-response scale than radio-sensitive films, were tested in comparison with quantitative autoradiography (QA). GnRH receptor saturation experiments were achieved on tissue sections (rat pituitary, rat brain, human ovary) with a iodinate GnRH agonist (125I-[D-Ala6,Des-Gly10]-LH-RH Ethylamide) for determination of affinity constant (Kd). In rat pituitary, comparable results were obtained with the 3 methods (Kd: 0.4 to 0.6 nM). Discrepancies occurred in the hippocampus and in the granulosa cell layer of the preovulatory follicle, due to low resolutive (PS) or short linear dose-response (films) performances. In the hippocampus GnRH receptor affinity was under-estimated with PS (Kd: 2.3 vs 0.5 and 0.6 nM for QA and HRRI respectively). In the follicular granulosa cell layer it was over-estimated by QA (0.5 vs 50 nM for the HRRI), while PS did not allow resolution of this thin cell layer. In conclusion, the HRRI is a very powerful tool for the quantification of in situ radioligand binding (binding sites study and in situ hybridization) in very discrete areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of receptor research\",\"volume\":\"14 3-4\",\"pages\":\"251-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/10799899409066035\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of receptor research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10799899409066035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of receptor research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10799899409066035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
新的放射成像仪,HRRI(高分辨率放射成像仪)和磷光成像仪(磷光屏:PS),倾向于显示更充分的线性剂量响应尺度比放射敏感的胶片,测试与定量放射自显影(QA)的比较。用碘化GnRH激动剂(125I-[D-Ala6,Des-Gly10]- lh - rh乙胺)在组织切片(大鼠垂体、大鼠脑、人卵巢)上进行GnRH受体饱和实验,测定亲和常数(Kd)。在大鼠垂体中,3种方法得到的结果相似(Kd: 0.4 ~ 0.6 nM)。由于低分辨率(PS)或短线性剂量反应(薄膜)表现,海马和排卵前卵泡颗粒细胞层出现差异。在海马中,PS低估了GnRH受体的亲和力(QA和HRRI的Kd分别为2.3 vs 0.5和0.6 nM)。在滤泡颗粒细胞层中,QA对其估计过高(HRRI为0.5 nM vs 50 nM),而PS无法分辨这种薄细胞层。总之,HRRI是一个非常强大的工具,用于在非常离散的区域定量放射配体的原位结合(结合位点研究和原位杂交)。
"In situ" characterization of GnRH receptors: use of two radioimagers and comparison with quantitative autoradiography.
New radioimagers, the HRRI (high resolution radioimager) and the Phosphorimager (phosphor screen : PS), apt to display more ample linear dose-response scale than radio-sensitive films, were tested in comparison with quantitative autoradiography (QA). GnRH receptor saturation experiments were achieved on tissue sections (rat pituitary, rat brain, human ovary) with a iodinate GnRH agonist (125I-[D-Ala6,Des-Gly10]-LH-RH Ethylamide) for determination of affinity constant (Kd). In rat pituitary, comparable results were obtained with the 3 methods (Kd: 0.4 to 0.6 nM). Discrepancies occurred in the hippocampus and in the granulosa cell layer of the preovulatory follicle, due to low resolutive (PS) or short linear dose-response (films) performances. In the hippocampus GnRH receptor affinity was under-estimated with PS (Kd: 2.3 vs 0.5 and 0.6 nM for QA and HRRI respectively). In the follicular granulosa cell layer it was over-estimated by QA (0.5 vs 50 nM for the HRRI), while PS did not allow resolution of this thin cell layer. In conclusion, the HRRI is a very powerful tool for the quantification of in situ radioligand binding (binding sites study and in situ hybridization) in very discrete areas.