胰岛素抵抗综合征(X综合征)两种胰岛素检测的评价。

S M Haffner, L Mykkänen, R A Valdez, M P Stern
{"title":"胰岛素抵抗综合征(X综合征)两种胰岛素检测的评价。","authors":"S M Haffner,&nbsp;L Mykkänen,&nbsp;R A Valdez,&nbsp;M P Stern","doi":"10.1161/01.atv.14.9.1430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent data suggest that proinsulin is associated with cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects. Since most conventional insulin assays cross-react with proinsulin, it has been suggested that the associations of insulin concentrations with dyslipidemia and hypertension could actually reflect associations with proinsulin. We examined these associations by using both a conventional immunoreactive insulin assay and a specific Linco insulin assay that does not cross-react with proinsulin in 623 nondiabetic and in 180 non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects who participated in the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based study of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Both the immunoreactive insulin assay and the specific Linco insulin assay were equally correlated with cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic subjects. Insulin concentrations were moderately correlated with high triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and were weakly correlated with increased blood pressure. In diabetic subjects there were only weak associations between insulin and cardiovascular risk factors using either assay. We conclude that the association of insulin concentrations with cardiovascular risk factors is not a function of using insulin assays that cross-react with proinsulin and that for epidemiological studies of cardiovascular risk factors, conventional immunoreactive insulin assays are as good as the newer specific insulin assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":8408,"journal":{"name":"Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology","volume":"14 9","pages":"1430-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1161/01.atv.14.9.1430","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of two insulin assays in insulin resistance syndrome (syndrome X).\",\"authors\":\"S M Haffner,&nbsp;L Mykkänen,&nbsp;R A Valdez,&nbsp;M P Stern\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.atv.14.9.1430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent data suggest that proinsulin is associated with cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects. Since most conventional insulin assays cross-react with proinsulin, it has been suggested that the associations of insulin concentrations with dyslipidemia and hypertension could actually reflect associations with proinsulin. We examined these associations by using both a conventional immunoreactive insulin assay and a specific Linco insulin assay that does not cross-react with proinsulin in 623 nondiabetic and in 180 non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects who participated in the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based study of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Both the immunoreactive insulin assay and the specific Linco insulin assay were equally correlated with cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic subjects. Insulin concentrations were moderately correlated with high triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and were weakly correlated with increased blood pressure. In diabetic subjects there were only weak associations between insulin and cardiovascular risk factors using either assay. We conclude that the association of insulin concentrations with cardiovascular risk factors is not a function of using insulin assays that cross-react with proinsulin and that for epidemiological studies of cardiovascular risk factors, conventional immunoreactive insulin assays are as good as the newer specific insulin assays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"1430-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1161/01.atv.14.9.1430\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.14.9.1430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.14.9.1430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

最近的数据表明,胰岛素原与非糖尿病和糖尿病患者的心血管危险因素有关。由于大多数传统的胰岛素检测方法与胰岛素原交叉反应,因此有人认为胰岛素浓度与血脂异常和高血压的关系实际上可能反映了胰岛素原的关系。我们对623名非糖尿病患者和180名非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者(他们参加了圣安东尼奥心脏研究,这是一项以人群为基础的糖尿病和心血管疾病研究)进行研究,通过使用传统的免疫反应性胰岛素测定和特异性林肯胰岛素测定(不与胰岛素原交叉反应)来检验这些关联。在非糖尿病受试者中,免疫反应性胰岛素试验和特异性林肯胰岛素试验均与心血管危险因素相关。胰岛素浓度与高甘油三酯和低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平中度相关,与血压升高弱相关。在糖尿病受试者中,胰岛素和心血管危险因素之间只有微弱的关联。我们的结论是,胰岛素浓度与心血管危险因素的关联不是使用胰岛素检测与胰岛素原交叉反应的功能,并且对于心血管危险因素的流行病学研究,传统的免疫反应性胰岛素检测与新的特异性胰岛素检测一样好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of two insulin assays in insulin resistance syndrome (syndrome X).

Recent data suggest that proinsulin is associated with cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects. Since most conventional insulin assays cross-react with proinsulin, it has been suggested that the associations of insulin concentrations with dyslipidemia and hypertension could actually reflect associations with proinsulin. We examined these associations by using both a conventional immunoreactive insulin assay and a specific Linco insulin assay that does not cross-react with proinsulin in 623 nondiabetic and in 180 non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects who participated in the San Antonio Heart Study, a population-based study of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Both the immunoreactive insulin assay and the specific Linco insulin assay were equally correlated with cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic subjects. Insulin concentrations were moderately correlated with high triglyceride and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and were weakly correlated with increased blood pressure. In diabetic subjects there were only weak associations between insulin and cardiovascular risk factors using either assay. We conclude that the association of insulin concentrations with cardiovascular risk factors is not a function of using insulin assays that cross-react with proinsulin and that for epidemiological studies of cardiovascular risk factors, conventional immunoreactive insulin assays are as good as the newer specific insulin assays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信