{"title":"徒手结合的复兴。","authors":"N L Feigenbaum","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A review of the literature from 1992 reveals few studies that deal specifically with freehand bonding. Yet freehand bonding is becoming increasingly popular. This contradiction bears in-depth study. How can there be a rise without its being reflected in the literature? The materials have greatly improved, but the techniques are virtually the same, and dentists do not often write articles about techniques that are not new. This paper presents a brief history of resin improvements and reasons that the popularity of freehand bonding is on the rise.</p>","PeriodicalId":79334,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in cosmetic dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"47-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A renaissance of freehand bonding.\",\"authors\":\"N L Feigenbaum\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A review of the literature from 1992 reveals few studies that deal specifically with freehand bonding. Yet freehand bonding is becoming increasingly popular. This contradiction bears in-depth study. How can there be a rise without its being reflected in the literature? The materials have greatly improved, but the techniques are virtually the same, and dentists do not often write articles about techniques that are not new. This paper presents a brief history of resin improvements and reasons that the popularity of freehand bonding is on the rise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in cosmetic dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"47-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in cosmetic dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in cosmetic dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review of the literature from 1992 reveals few studies that deal specifically with freehand bonding. Yet freehand bonding is becoming increasingly popular. This contradiction bears in-depth study. How can there be a rise without its being reflected in the literature? The materials have greatly improved, but the techniques are virtually the same, and dentists do not often write articles about techniques that are not new. This paper presents a brief history of resin improvements and reasons that the popularity of freehand bonding is on the rise.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
