布地奈德和特非那定单独或联合治疗花粉热。

Annals of allergy Pub Date : 1994-12-01
R J Simpson
{"title":"布地奈德和特非那定单独或联合治疗花粉热。","authors":"R J Simpson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While hay fever is a very common experience, its treatment in primary care setting has been little reported in controlled studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to evaluate the patient's assessment of efficacy of an intranasal steroid spray (budesonide) alone or in combination with an antihistamine (terfenadine) against terfenadine alone or placebo alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind parallel group, placebo-controlled trial design was used, comparing the four groups. Each group used an active or placebo spray and active or placebo tablets. Symptom scores were recorded daily in diaries over a 21-day period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall assessment of efficacy by the 106 patients was significantly greater (P < .05) for budesonide versus terfenadine or placebo alone. There was a 40% placebo response. Budesonide was more effective than terfenadine for all individual symptom scores, particularly nasal blockage, against which terfenadine was ineffective. Adverse effects were mild and transient for all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Budesonide alone is a highly effective treatment for hay fever with few side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7931,"journal":{"name":"Annals of allergy","volume":"73 6","pages":"497-502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Budesonide and terfenadine, separately and in combination, in the treatment of hay fever.\",\"authors\":\"R J Simpson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While hay fever is a very common experience, its treatment in primary care setting has been little reported in controlled studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to evaluate the patient's assessment of efficacy of an intranasal steroid spray (budesonide) alone or in combination with an antihistamine (terfenadine) against terfenadine alone or placebo alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double-blind parallel group, placebo-controlled trial design was used, comparing the four groups. Each group used an active or placebo spray and active or placebo tablets. Symptom scores were recorded daily in diaries over a 21-day period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall assessment of efficacy by the 106 patients was significantly greater (P < .05) for budesonide versus terfenadine or placebo alone. There was a 40% placebo response. Budesonide was more effective than terfenadine for all individual symptom scores, particularly nasal blockage, against which terfenadine was ineffective. Adverse effects were mild and transient for all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Budesonide alone is a highly effective treatment for hay fever with few side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of allergy\",\"volume\":\"73 6\",\"pages\":\"497-502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然花粉热是一种非常常见的经历,但其在初级保健机构的治疗在对照研究中很少报道。目的:本研究旨在评估患者对鼻内类固醇喷雾剂(布地奈德)单独使用或与抗组胺药(特非那定)联合使用的疗效,而不是单独使用特非那定或单独使用安慰剂。方法:采用双盲平行组,安慰剂对照试验设计,对四组进行比较。每组使用活性或安慰剂喷雾和活性或安慰剂药片。在21天的时间里,每天在日记中记录症状评分。结果:106例患者对布地奈德的总体疗效评估显著高于单独使用特非那定或安慰剂(P < 0.05)。有40%的安慰剂反应。布地奈德在所有个体症状评分上都比特非那定更有效,尤其是鼻塞,而特非那定对鼻塞无效。所有组的不良反应都是轻微和短暂的。结论:布地奈德是治疗花粉热的有效药物,且副作用少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Budesonide and terfenadine, separately and in combination, in the treatment of hay fever.

Background: While hay fever is a very common experience, its treatment in primary care setting has been little reported in controlled studies.

Objective: This study sought to evaluate the patient's assessment of efficacy of an intranasal steroid spray (budesonide) alone or in combination with an antihistamine (terfenadine) against terfenadine alone or placebo alone.

Methods: A double-blind parallel group, placebo-controlled trial design was used, comparing the four groups. Each group used an active or placebo spray and active or placebo tablets. Symptom scores were recorded daily in diaries over a 21-day period.

Results: Overall assessment of efficacy by the 106 patients was significantly greater (P < .05) for budesonide versus terfenadine or placebo alone. There was a 40% placebo response. Budesonide was more effective than terfenadine for all individual symptom scores, particularly nasal blockage, against which terfenadine was ineffective. Adverse effects were mild and transient for all groups.

Conclusions: Budesonide alone is a highly effective treatment for hay fever with few side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信