电生理与视觉和听觉模式的提示注意力转移相关

Kenneth Hugdahl, Helge Nordby
{"title":"电生理与视觉和听觉模式的提示注意力转移相关","authors":"Kenneth Hugdahl,&nbsp;Helge Nordby","doi":"10.1016/S0163-1047(05)80055-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reaction time (RT) is usually speeded and slowed tocorrectly and incorrectly cued target stimuli, respectively, in experiments on attention shift (<span>Posner, 1988</span>). When targets occur in a spatial location different from the cue, shifting attention from the cued location to the target location involves <em>interrupt</em> of ongoing activity, <em>move</em> attention to the new location, and <em>reengage</em> attention. The present study investigated whether the cognitive operations involved in cued vs uncued attentional shifts also were detectable in the event-related potentials (ERPs). Two experiments are reported, one with visual and one with auditory stimuli. In the visual modality, the cue and target were a lit-up square and an asterisk, respectively, shown on a computer screen. In the auditory modality, the cue was a tone in either the left or right ear, followed by the target noise in either the same or the opposite ear. The results from the visual experiment showed shorter RTs to correctly cued (Valid) targets and longer RTs to incorrectly cued (Invalid) targets. Invalidly cued targets elicited enhanced P3 amplitudes, with a frontocentral distribution. Reduced P3 amplitudes were observed on Valid trials, largest reduction for parietooccipital leads. The auditory experiment showed P3 enhancement frontally and reduced amplitudes at temporal and parietal leads. No RT differences were seen to Valid and Invalid trials. The existence of an anterior attention system involved in interrupt and disengage of attention, and a posterior attention facilitation system related to cue presentation is discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8732,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral and neural biology","volume":"62 1","pages":"Pages 21-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0163-1047(05)80055-X","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Hugdahl,&nbsp;Helge Nordby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0163-1047(05)80055-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reaction time (RT) is usually speeded and slowed tocorrectly and incorrectly cued target stimuli, respectively, in experiments on attention shift (<span>Posner, 1988</span>). When targets occur in a spatial location different from the cue, shifting attention from the cued location to the target location involves <em>interrupt</em> of ongoing activity, <em>move</em> attention to the new location, and <em>reengage</em> attention. The present study investigated whether the cognitive operations involved in cued vs uncued attentional shifts also were detectable in the event-related potentials (ERPs). Two experiments are reported, one with visual and one with auditory stimuli. In the visual modality, the cue and target were a lit-up square and an asterisk, respectively, shown on a computer screen. In the auditory modality, the cue was a tone in either the left or right ear, followed by the target noise in either the same or the opposite ear. The results from the visual experiment showed shorter RTs to correctly cued (Valid) targets and longer RTs to incorrectly cued (Invalid) targets. Invalidly cued targets elicited enhanced P3 amplitudes, with a frontocentral distribution. Reduced P3 amplitudes were observed on Valid trials, largest reduction for parietooccipital leads. The auditory experiment showed P3 enhancement frontally and reduced amplitudes at temporal and parietal leads. No RT differences were seen to Valid and Invalid trials. The existence of an anterior attention system involved in interrupt and disengage of attention, and a posterior attention facilitation system related to cue presentation is discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral and neural biology\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 21-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0163-1047(05)80055-X\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral and neural biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016310470580055X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral and neural biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016310470580055X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

在注意转移实验中,反应时间(RT)通常对正确提示的目标刺激加快或减慢(Posner, 1988)。当目标出现在与提示不同的空间位置时,将注意力从提示位置转移到目标位置需要中断正在进行的活动,将注意力转移到新位置,然后重新集中注意力。本研究探讨了在事件相关电位(ERPs)中是否也能检测到提示和未提示注意转移所涉及的认知操作。报告了两个实验,一个是视觉刺激,一个是听觉刺激。在视觉模式中,线索和目标分别是一个亮着的正方形和一个星号,显示在电脑屏幕上。在听觉模式中,提示是左耳或右耳的音调,然后是同耳或对耳的目标噪声。视觉实验结果显示,较短的RTs能够正确提示(有效)目标,较长的RTs能够错误提示(无效)目标。无效提示靶引起P3振幅增强,呈额中央分布。在有效试验中观察到P3振幅降低,顶枕导联降幅最大。听觉实验显示额侧P3增强,颞和顶叶导联波幅降低。有效试验和无效试验的RT无差异。讨论了与注意力中断和注意力脱离相关的前注意系统和线索呈现相关的后注意促进系统的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities

Reaction time (RT) is usually speeded and slowed tocorrectly and incorrectly cued target stimuli, respectively, in experiments on attention shift (Posner, 1988). When targets occur in a spatial location different from the cue, shifting attention from the cued location to the target location involves interrupt of ongoing activity, move attention to the new location, and reengage attention. The present study investigated whether the cognitive operations involved in cued vs uncued attentional shifts also were detectable in the event-related potentials (ERPs). Two experiments are reported, one with visual and one with auditory stimuli. In the visual modality, the cue and target were a lit-up square and an asterisk, respectively, shown on a computer screen. In the auditory modality, the cue was a tone in either the left or right ear, followed by the target noise in either the same or the opposite ear. The results from the visual experiment showed shorter RTs to correctly cued (Valid) targets and longer RTs to incorrectly cued (Invalid) targets. Invalidly cued targets elicited enhanced P3 amplitudes, with a frontocentral distribution. Reduced P3 amplitudes were observed on Valid trials, largest reduction for parietooccipital leads. The auditory experiment showed P3 enhancement frontally and reduced amplitudes at temporal and parietal leads. No RT differences were seen to Valid and Invalid trials. The existence of an anterior attention system involved in interrupt and disengage of attention, and a posterior attention facilitation system related to cue presentation is discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信