{"title":"同行评议:准备评估者。","authors":"S Meredith","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article proposes a different approach to address a key issue within the performance appraisal process: the preparation of Peer Evaluators. The need to regularly assess and verify the clinical expertise of registered nurses has long been recognized. Health care facilities have responded, acknowledging that competency--based evaluation systems can contribute to RN autonomy, accountability, and the refinement of professional standards. The evolution of peer review has expanded the benefits and efficacy of such systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":77058,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","volume":"7 2","pages":"69-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer review: preparing the evaluator.\",\"authors\":\"S Meredith\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article proposes a different approach to address a key issue within the performance appraisal process: the preparation of Peer Evaluators. The need to regularly assess and verify the clinical expertise of registered nurses has long been recognized. Health care facilities have responded, acknowledging that competency--based evaluation systems can contribute to RN autonomy, accountability, and the refinement of professional standards. The evolution of peer review has expanded the benefits and efficacy of such systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of nursing administration\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"69-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of nursing administration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of nursing administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article proposes a different approach to address a key issue within the performance appraisal process: the preparation of Peer Evaluators. The need to regularly assess and verify the clinical expertise of registered nurses has long been recognized. Health care facilities have responded, acknowledging that competency--based evaluation systems can contribute to RN autonomy, accountability, and the refinement of professional standards. The evolution of peer review has expanded the benefits and efficacy of such systems.