A Loua, L Kestens, G Vanham, L Boel, R Colebunders, P Gigase
{"title":"[ELISA检测CD4+ T淋巴细胞计数和总淋巴细胞计数在评估HIV感染免疫缺陷状态中的有效性]。","authors":"A Loua, L Kestens, G Vanham, L Boel, R Colebunders, P Gigase","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A newly available commercial ELISA (TRAx CD4, T Cell Diagnostics USA) for enumerating CD4+ T lymphocytes has been evaluated with blood samples of 105 HIV seropositive and 6 seronegative subjects. Results from the flow cytometric analysis were used as reference. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA to identify HIV seropositive subjects having less than 200 CD4+ T lymphocytes/microliters were assessed and studied using the ROC curve. The reproducibility of the ELISA test was analyzed on 40 samples. The results of the ELISA correlated well with these of the flow cytometric analysis (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). However, the ELISA test tends to overestimate the true CD4 count in HIV seropositives. This overestimation could not be explained by the aspecific contribution of monocytic CD4. The threshold for identifying HIV seropositive subjects with less than 200 CD4+ T lymphocytes with a maximum sensitivity and specificity was determined with ROC curve and equalled 400 cell equivalents with the ELISA (sensitivity and specificity were equal to 80%) and 1,450 lymphocytes/microliters with the total absolute lymphocyte count (sensitivity and specificity were equal to 75%). Using this curve, a threshold of 300 cell equivalents for the ELISA test and of 1,100 lymphocytes/microliters for the absolute lymphocyte count was shown to maximize the specificity (> 95%) without a significant loss of sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7901,"journal":{"name":"Annales de la Societe belge de medecine tropicale","volume":"74 1","pages":"61-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validity of an ELISA test for CD4+ T lymphocyte count and validity of total lymphocyte count in the assessment of immunodeficiency status in HIV infection].\",\"authors\":\"A Loua, L Kestens, G Vanham, L Boel, R Colebunders, P Gigase\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A newly available commercial ELISA (TRAx CD4, T Cell Diagnostics USA) for enumerating CD4+ T lymphocytes has been evaluated with blood samples of 105 HIV seropositive and 6 seronegative subjects. Results from the flow cytometric analysis were used as reference. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA to identify HIV seropositive subjects having less than 200 CD4+ T lymphocytes/microliters were assessed and studied using the ROC curve. The reproducibility of the ELISA test was analyzed on 40 samples. The results of the ELISA correlated well with these of the flow cytometric analysis (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). However, the ELISA test tends to overestimate the true CD4 count in HIV seropositives. This overestimation could not be explained by the aspecific contribution of monocytic CD4. The threshold for identifying HIV seropositive subjects with less than 200 CD4+ T lymphocytes with a maximum sensitivity and specificity was determined with ROC curve and equalled 400 cell equivalents with the ELISA (sensitivity and specificity were equal to 80%) and 1,450 lymphocytes/microliters with the total absolute lymphocyte count (sensitivity and specificity were equal to 75%). Using this curve, a threshold of 300 cell equivalents for the ELISA test and of 1,100 lymphocytes/microliters for the absolute lymphocyte count was shown to maximize the specificity (> 95%) without a significant loss of sensitivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de la Societe belge de medecine tropicale\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"61-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de la Societe belge de medecine tropicale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de la Societe belge de medecine tropicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一种新上市的商用ELISA (TRAx CD4, T Cell Diagnostics USA)用于计数CD4+ T淋巴细胞,已对105名HIV血清阳性和6名血清阴性受试者的血液样本进行了评估。以流式细胞术分析结果为参考。采用ROC曲线评估ELISA对CD4+ T淋巴细胞小于200 /微升的HIV血清阳性受试者的敏感性和特异性。对40份样品进行了酶联免疫吸附试验的重复性分析。ELISA结果与流式细胞术分析结果具有良好的相关性(r = 0.79, p < 0.001)。然而,ELISA测试倾向于高估HIV血清阳性患者的真实CD4计数。这种高估不能用单核细胞CD4的特定贡献来解释。采用ROC曲线确定CD4+ T淋巴细胞≤200的HIV血清阳性受试者的最大灵敏度和特异性阈值,与ELISA测定的阈值为400细胞当量(灵敏度和特异性均为80%),与总淋巴细胞绝对计数的阈值为1450淋巴细胞/微升(灵敏度和特异性均为75%)。利用这条曲线,ELISA检测的阈值为300个细胞当量,绝对淋巴细胞计数的阈值为1100个淋巴细胞/微升,可以最大限度地提高特异性(> 95%),而不会显著降低敏感性。
[Validity of an ELISA test for CD4+ T lymphocyte count and validity of total lymphocyte count in the assessment of immunodeficiency status in HIV infection].
A newly available commercial ELISA (TRAx CD4, T Cell Diagnostics USA) for enumerating CD4+ T lymphocytes has been evaluated with blood samples of 105 HIV seropositive and 6 seronegative subjects. Results from the flow cytometric analysis were used as reference. The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA to identify HIV seropositive subjects having less than 200 CD4+ T lymphocytes/microliters were assessed and studied using the ROC curve. The reproducibility of the ELISA test was analyzed on 40 samples. The results of the ELISA correlated well with these of the flow cytometric analysis (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). However, the ELISA test tends to overestimate the true CD4 count in HIV seropositives. This overestimation could not be explained by the aspecific contribution of monocytic CD4. The threshold for identifying HIV seropositive subjects with less than 200 CD4+ T lymphocytes with a maximum sensitivity and specificity was determined with ROC curve and equalled 400 cell equivalents with the ELISA (sensitivity and specificity were equal to 80%) and 1,450 lymphocytes/microliters with the total absolute lymphocyte count (sensitivity and specificity were equal to 75%). Using this curve, a threshold of 300 cell equivalents for the ELISA test and of 1,100 lymphocytes/microliters for the absolute lymphocyte count was shown to maximize the specificity (> 95%) without a significant loss of sensitivity.