{"title":"宫颈锥体发育不良和原位癌。伴随子宫刮除的作用[j]。","authors":"J Kazadi Buanga, M J Acosta Vazquez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reevaluation of the usefulness of routine uterine curettage with every cervical cone biopsy.</p><p><strong>Material: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 250 cervical cone biopsies over an 18 year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>240 analysable cases were included. 90 patients had undergone cone biopsy only and 150 cone biopsy accompanied by uterine curettage. Curettage material was histologically normal 115 times (76.6%), negative or invalid 26 times (17.3%) and pathological 10 times (6.6%). Pathology consisted of 7 cases of hyperplasia and 3 of endometritis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine uterine curettage whenever cone biopsy is performed is of no value other than in certain special circumstances concerning clinical status and ultrasound findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21300,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Cervical conization in dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Role of concomitant uterine curettage].\",\"authors\":\"J Kazadi Buanga, M J Acosta Vazquez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Reevaluation of the usefulness of routine uterine curettage with every cervical cone biopsy.</p><p><strong>Material: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 250 cervical cone biopsies over an 18 year period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>240 analysable cases were included. 90 patients had undergone cone biopsy only and 150 cone biopsy accompanied by uterine curettage. Curettage material was histologically normal 115 times (76.6%), negative or invalid 26 times (17.3%) and pathological 10 times (6.6%). Pathology consisted of 7 cases of hyperplasia and 3 of endometritis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routine uterine curettage whenever cone biopsy is performed is of no value other than in certain special circumstances concerning clinical status and ultrasound findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Cervical conization in dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Role of concomitant uterine curettage].
Objective: Reevaluation of the usefulness of routine uterine curettage with every cervical cone biopsy.
Material: Retrospective analysis of 250 cervical cone biopsies over an 18 year period.
Results: 240 analysable cases were included. 90 patients had undergone cone biopsy only and 150 cone biopsy accompanied by uterine curettage. Curettage material was histologically normal 115 times (76.6%), negative or invalid 26 times (17.3%) and pathological 10 times (6.6%). Pathology consisted of 7 cases of hyperplasia and 3 of endometritis.
Conclusion: Routine uterine curettage whenever cone biopsy is performed is of no value other than in certain special circumstances concerning clinical status and ultrasound findings.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
