美国精神病学史上对反精神病学和污名的反思。

N Dain
{"title":"美国精神病学史上对反精神病学和污名的反思。","authors":"N Dain","doi":"10.1176/ps.45.10.1010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The author presents his perspectives on the relationship between antipsychiatry and the stigma of mental illness. Stigma has existed at least since biblical times, when madness as demonic possession and punishment for sin became codified in religious belief and practice. The antipsychiatry movement dates from the 18th century, when psychiatry first emerged as a medical specialty and the first mental hospitals were built. Over the years psychiatry has been a target for antipsychiatry groups competing for influence or authority over the mentally ill. At various times these groups have included neurologists, social workers, new religions, consumers, and psychiatrists themselves. Their common ground has been objection to psychiatry as a hospital-centered medical specialty legally authorized to institutionalize and treat patients. In the late 19th century, treatment of hospitalized patients increased the stigma of mental illness and provided fuel for the antipsychiatry movement. During that period psychiatrists began to see heredity as the cause of mental illness, became pessimistic about restoring patients to sanity, and adopted essentially a custodial approach to care that included use of physical restraints. However, recent advances in biological treatments have undercut antipsychiatry and rekindled optimism about recovery that may go far in eliminating stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":75910,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & community psychiatry","volume":"45 10","pages":"1010-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.10.1010","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on antipsychiatry and stigma in the history of American psychiatry.\",\"authors\":\"N Dain\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/ps.45.10.1010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The author presents his perspectives on the relationship between antipsychiatry and the stigma of mental illness. Stigma has existed at least since biblical times, when madness as demonic possession and punishment for sin became codified in religious belief and practice. The antipsychiatry movement dates from the 18th century, when psychiatry first emerged as a medical specialty and the first mental hospitals were built. Over the years psychiatry has been a target for antipsychiatry groups competing for influence or authority over the mentally ill. At various times these groups have included neurologists, social workers, new religions, consumers, and psychiatrists themselves. Their common ground has been objection to psychiatry as a hospital-centered medical specialty legally authorized to institutionalize and treat patients. In the late 19th century, treatment of hospitalized patients increased the stigma of mental illness and provided fuel for the antipsychiatry movement. During that period psychiatrists began to see heredity as the cause of mental illness, became pessimistic about restoring patients to sanity, and adopted essentially a custodial approach to care that included use of physical restraints. However, recent advances in biological treatments have undercut antipsychiatry and rekindled optimism about recovery that may go far in eliminating stigma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital & community psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"45 10\",\"pages\":\"1010-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.10.1010\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital & community psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.10.1010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital & community psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.10.1010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

作者提出了他的观点之间的关系的反精神病学和精神疾病的耻辱。耻辱至少从圣经时代就存在了,当时疯狂被恶魔附身和对罪恶的惩罚被写入宗教信仰和实践。反精神病学运动始于18世纪,当时精神病学首次作为一门医学专业出现,并建立了第一批精神病院。多年来,精神病学一直是反精神病学团体争夺对精神病患者的影响力或权威的目标。在不同时期,这些群体包括神经学家、社会工作者、新兴宗教、消费者和精神病学家自己。他们的共同立场是反对精神病学作为一种以医院为中心的医学专业,在法律上被授权对病人进行机构化和治疗。在19世纪后期,对住院病人的治疗增加了精神疾病的耻辱,并为反精神病学运动提供了燃料。在此期间,精神病学家开始将遗传视为精神疾病的原因,对恢复病人的理智变得悲观起来,并基本上采用了一种监禁的方法来治疗,包括使用身体约束。然而,生物治疗的最新进展削弱了反精神病学,并重新燃起了人们对康复的乐观情绪,这可能会在消除耻辱方面走得很远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections on antipsychiatry and stigma in the history of American psychiatry.

The author presents his perspectives on the relationship between antipsychiatry and the stigma of mental illness. Stigma has existed at least since biblical times, when madness as demonic possession and punishment for sin became codified in religious belief and practice. The antipsychiatry movement dates from the 18th century, when psychiatry first emerged as a medical specialty and the first mental hospitals were built. Over the years psychiatry has been a target for antipsychiatry groups competing for influence or authority over the mentally ill. At various times these groups have included neurologists, social workers, new religions, consumers, and psychiatrists themselves. Their common ground has been objection to psychiatry as a hospital-centered medical specialty legally authorized to institutionalize and treat patients. In the late 19th century, treatment of hospitalized patients increased the stigma of mental illness and provided fuel for the antipsychiatry movement. During that period psychiatrists began to see heredity as the cause of mental illness, became pessimistic about restoring patients to sanity, and adopted essentially a custodial approach to care that included use of physical restraints. However, recent advances in biological treatments have undercut antipsychiatry and rekindled optimism about recovery that may go far in eliminating stigma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信