{"title":"主动脉分叉手术后主动脉近端吻合的修复","authors":"Th.W. Kraus, B. Paetz, Th. Hupp, J.R. Allenberg","doi":"10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80655-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The implantation of an aortic bifurcation graft (ABG) for treatment of occlusive (OD) and aneurysmal (AD) aortoiliac disease is a standard technique with good long-term results and a relatively low incidence of complications. In a retrospective review of our patients from 1964 to 1993 only 36/1520 patients were identified who required reoperation at the proximal aortic anastomosis after ABG. Indications were graft occlusion (15/36) and graft stenoses (2/36), refractory to graft thrombectomy, proximal aortic anastomotic aneurysms (11/36) or graft infection (8/36). Graft occlusion or stenosis most frequently led to aortic reoperation in the OD-group (53.5%), recurrent aneurysmal disease (37.5%) and graft infection (37.5%) were the dominant indications in the AD-group. Mean time interval to reoperation was shorter in cases of graft infection (35 ± 33 months) as compared with graft stenosis (66 ±58 months), graft occlusion (86 ± 49 months) or aortic anastomotic aneurysms (152 ± 90 months). Of the reoperations, 92% were done electively, 8% as emergency procedures. The perioperative course was uneventful in 67% of patients. Overall mortality rate after elective revisional surgery was 3% but reached 66% in emergencies. Postoperative morbidity and mortality was related to preoperative morbidity and the urgency of surgery, not with the mode of aortic intervention nor indication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77123,"journal":{"name":"European journal of vascular surgery","volume":"8 6","pages":"Pages 735-740"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80655-3","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision of the proximal aortic anastomosis after aortic bifurcation surgery\",\"authors\":\"Th.W. Kraus, B. Paetz, Th. Hupp, J.R. Allenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80655-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The implantation of an aortic bifurcation graft (ABG) for treatment of occlusive (OD) and aneurysmal (AD) aortoiliac disease is a standard technique with good long-term results and a relatively low incidence of complications. In a retrospective review of our patients from 1964 to 1993 only 36/1520 patients were identified who required reoperation at the proximal aortic anastomosis after ABG. Indications were graft occlusion (15/36) and graft stenoses (2/36), refractory to graft thrombectomy, proximal aortic anastomotic aneurysms (11/36) or graft infection (8/36). Graft occlusion or stenosis most frequently led to aortic reoperation in the OD-group (53.5%), recurrent aneurysmal disease (37.5%) and graft infection (37.5%) were the dominant indications in the AD-group. Mean time interval to reoperation was shorter in cases of graft infection (35 ± 33 months) as compared with graft stenosis (66 ±58 months), graft occlusion (86 ± 49 months) or aortic anastomotic aneurysms (152 ± 90 months). Of the reoperations, 92% were done electively, 8% as emergency procedures. The perioperative course was uneventful in 67% of patients. Overall mortality rate after elective revisional surgery was 3% but reached 66% in emergencies. Postoperative morbidity and mortality was related to preoperative morbidity and the urgency of surgery, not with the mode of aortic intervention nor indication.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of vascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 735-740\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80655-3\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of vascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950821X05806553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950821X05806553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revision of the proximal aortic anastomosis after aortic bifurcation surgery
The implantation of an aortic bifurcation graft (ABG) for treatment of occlusive (OD) and aneurysmal (AD) aortoiliac disease is a standard technique with good long-term results and a relatively low incidence of complications. In a retrospective review of our patients from 1964 to 1993 only 36/1520 patients were identified who required reoperation at the proximal aortic anastomosis after ABG. Indications were graft occlusion (15/36) and graft stenoses (2/36), refractory to graft thrombectomy, proximal aortic anastomotic aneurysms (11/36) or graft infection (8/36). Graft occlusion or stenosis most frequently led to aortic reoperation in the OD-group (53.5%), recurrent aneurysmal disease (37.5%) and graft infection (37.5%) were the dominant indications in the AD-group. Mean time interval to reoperation was shorter in cases of graft infection (35 ± 33 months) as compared with graft stenosis (66 ±58 months), graft occlusion (86 ± 49 months) or aortic anastomotic aneurysms (152 ± 90 months). Of the reoperations, 92% were done electively, 8% as emergency procedures. The perioperative course was uneventful in 67% of patients. Overall mortality rate after elective revisional surgery was 3% but reached 66% in emergencies. Postoperative morbidity and mortality was related to preoperative morbidity and the urgency of surgery, not with the mode of aortic intervention nor indication.