人细胞中甲基化剂在染色体畸变产生中的错配修复作用

Sheila M. Galloway, Susan K. Greenwood, Rosina B. Hill, Carole I. Bradt, Christian L. Bean
{"title":"人细胞中甲基化剂在染色体畸变产生中的错配修复作用","authors":"Sheila M. Galloway,&nbsp;Susan K. Greenwood,&nbsp;Rosina B. Hill,&nbsp;Carole I. Bradt,&nbsp;Christian L. Bean","doi":"10.1016/0165-7992(95)90040-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We have shown previously that certain alkylation products, or alkylation derived lesions, which induce chromosome aberrations (abs) persist for at least two cell cycles in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The increase in abs in the second cycle after treatment contrasts with the classical observation of reduction in ab yield with successive mitoses following ionizing radiation. Here we present evidence that processing of lesions by mismatch repair is a mechanism for ab induction by methylating agents.</p><p>Our previous studies implicated <em>O</em><sup>6</sup>-methylguanine (O<sup>6</sup>MeG) as an important lesion in induction of abs, particularly in the second cell cycle after treatment. In the absence of repair of O<sup>6</sup>MeG by alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), new abs were induced in the second cycle after treatment with e.g. methylnitronitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and methylnitrosourea (MNU). Thus, we hypothesized that abs were produced not by O<sup>6</sup>MeG or its repair in the first S phase, but by subsequent processing of the lesions. We suggested that after replication proceeded past the O<sup>6</sup>MeG lesion in the first S phase, inserting an incorrect base on the newly synthesized strand, recognition and repair by mismatch repair in the second S phase led to a chromosome ab. Here we used MT1 cells, a human lymphoblastoid cell line that has a defect in strand-specific mismatch repair. MT1 cells are alkylation tolerant and have a mutator phenotype, compared with their parent line, TK6; both MT1 and TK6 cells lack AGT so do not remove the methyl group from O<sup>6</sup>MeG. While the initial levels of abs at the first metaphase were similar in MT1 and TK6 cells, ab levels in MT1 cells were greatly reduced in the second and third cell cycles following treatment with MNNG, dimethylnitrosamine and MNU, in contrast with the parent TK6 cells, which had more abs in the second cell cycle than in the first. This supports the hypothesis that repair of mismatched base pairs involving O<sup>6</sup>MeG is one mechanism for induction of chromosome abs. In contrast to the difference in response to methylating agents between TK6 cells and mismatch repair-deficient MT1 cells, the profile of ab induction by an ethylating agent, ethylnitronitrosourea, was similar in MT1 cells to those for TK6 cells and CHO cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100934,"journal":{"name":"Mutation Research Letters","volume":"346 4","pages":"Pages 231-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-7992(95)90040-3","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A role for mismatch repair in production of chromosome aberrations by methylating agents in human cells\",\"authors\":\"Sheila M. Galloway,&nbsp;Susan K. Greenwood,&nbsp;Rosina B. Hill,&nbsp;Carole I. Bradt,&nbsp;Christian L. Bean\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-7992(95)90040-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We have shown previously that certain alkylation products, or alkylation derived lesions, which induce chromosome aberrations (abs) persist for at least two cell cycles in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The increase in abs in the second cycle after treatment contrasts with the classical observation of reduction in ab yield with successive mitoses following ionizing radiation. Here we present evidence that processing of lesions by mismatch repair is a mechanism for ab induction by methylating agents.</p><p>Our previous studies implicated <em>O</em><sup>6</sup>-methylguanine (O<sup>6</sup>MeG) as an important lesion in induction of abs, particularly in the second cell cycle after treatment. In the absence of repair of O<sup>6</sup>MeG by alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), new abs were induced in the second cycle after treatment with e.g. methylnitronitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and methylnitrosourea (MNU). Thus, we hypothesized that abs were produced not by O<sup>6</sup>MeG or its repair in the first S phase, but by subsequent processing of the lesions. We suggested that after replication proceeded past the O<sup>6</sup>MeG lesion in the first S phase, inserting an incorrect base on the newly synthesized strand, recognition and repair by mismatch repair in the second S phase led to a chromosome ab. Here we used MT1 cells, a human lymphoblastoid cell line that has a defect in strand-specific mismatch repair. MT1 cells are alkylation tolerant and have a mutator phenotype, compared with their parent line, TK6; both MT1 and TK6 cells lack AGT so do not remove the methyl group from O<sup>6</sup>MeG. While the initial levels of abs at the first metaphase were similar in MT1 and TK6 cells, ab levels in MT1 cells were greatly reduced in the second and third cell cycles following treatment with MNNG, dimethylnitrosamine and MNU, in contrast with the parent TK6 cells, which had more abs in the second cell cycle than in the first. This supports the hypothesis that repair of mismatched base pairs involving O<sup>6</sup>MeG is one mechanism for induction of chromosome abs. In contrast to the difference in response to methylating agents between TK6 cells and mismatch repair-deficient MT1 cells, the profile of ab induction by an ethylating agent, ethylnitronitrosourea, was similar in MT1 cells to those for TK6 cells and CHO cells.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"346 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 231-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-7992(95)90040-3\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165799295900403\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165799295900403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

我们之前已经表明,某些烷基化产物或烷基化衍生的病变,诱导染色体畸变(abs)在中国仓鼠卵巢细胞中持续至少两个细胞周期。治疗后第二个周期的抗体增加与电离辐射后连续有丝分裂的抗体产量减少的经典观察形成对比。在这里,我们提出的证据表明,通过错配修复处理病变是甲基化剂诱导ab的一种机制。我们之前的研究表明o6 -甲基鸟嘌呤(O6MeG)是诱导abs的重要病变,特别是在治疗后的第二个细胞周期。在没有烷基鸟嘌呤DNA烷基转移酶(AGT)修复O6MeG的情况下,甲基硝基硝基胍(MNNG)和甲基亚硝基脲(MNU)处理后,在第二周期诱导产生新的抗体。因此,我们假设abs不是由O6MeG或其在第一个S期的修复产生的,而是由病变的后续处理产生的。我们认为,在复制经过第一个S期的O6MeG病变后,在新合成的链上插入一个错误的碱基,在第二个S期通过错配修复进行识别和修复导致了染色体ab。这里我们使用MT1细胞,一种具有链特异性错配修复缺陷的人淋巴母细胞系。与其亲本系TK6相比,MT1细胞具有烷基化耐受性和突变表型;MT1和TK6细胞都缺乏AGT,因此不会从O6MeG中去除甲基。虽然MT1和TK6细胞在第一中期的初始抗体水平相似,但在MNNG、二甲基亚硝胺和MNU处理后,MT1细胞的抗体水平在第二和第三个细胞周期中大大降低,与亲本TK6细胞相比,后者在第二个细胞周期中比第一个细胞周期中有更多的抗体。这支持了一种假设,即涉及O6MeG的错配碱基对修复是诱导染色体abs的一种机制。与TK6细胞和错配修复缺陷的MT1细胞对甲基化剂的反应不同,甲基化剂乙基硝基脲在MT1细胞中诱导ab的情况与TK6细胞和CHO细胞相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A role for mismatch repair in production of chromosome aberrations by methylating agents in human cells

We have shown previously that certain alkylation products, or alkylation derived lesions, which induce chromosome aberrations (abs) persist for at least two cell cycles in Chinese hamster ovary cells. The increase in abs in the second cycle after treatment contrasts with the classical observation of reduction in ab yield with successive mitoses following ionizing radiation. Here we present evidence that processing of lesions by mismatch repair is a mechanism for ab induction by methylating agents.

Our previous studies implicated O6-methylguanine (O6MeG) as an important lesion in induction of abs, particularly in the second cell cycle after treatment. In the absence of repair of O6MeG by alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), new abs were induced in the second cycle after treatment with e.g. methylnitronitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and methylnitrosourea (MNU). Thus, we hypothesized that abs were produced not by O6MeG or its repair in the first S phase, but by subsequent processing of the lesions. We suggested that after replication proceeded past the O6MeG lesion in the first S phase, inserting an incorrect base on the newly synthesized strand, recognition and repair by mismatch repair in the second S phase led to a chromosome ab. Here we used MT1 cells, a human lymphoblastoid cell line that has a defect in strand-specific mismatch repair. MT1 cells are alkylation tolerant and have a mutator phenotype, compared with their parent line, TK6; both MT1 and TK6 cells lack AGT so do not remove the methyl group from O6MeG. While the initial levels of abs at the first metaphase were similar in MT1 and TK6 cells, ab levels in MT1 cells were greatly reduced in the second and third cell cycles following treatment with MNNG, dimethylnitrosamine and MNU, in contrast with the parent TK6 cells, which had more abs in the second cell cycle than in the first. This supports the hypothesis that repair of mismatched base pairs involving O6MeG is one mechanism for induction of chromosome abs. In contrast to the difference in response to methylating agents between TK6 cells and mismatch repair-deficient MT1 cells, the profile of ab induction by an ethylating agent, ethylnitronitrosourea, was similar in MT1 cells to those for TK6 cells and CHO cells.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信