计算机化生理数据中伪影的实际管理。

S Cunningham, A G Symon, N McIntosh
{"title":"计算机化生理数据中伪影的实际管理。","authors":"S Cunningham,&nbsp;A G Symon,&nbsp;N McIntosh","doi":"10.1007/BF01139872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computerised physiological data contains artifact that needs to be identified and possibly removed. Whilst computers may eventually satisfactorily perform this function, at present only manual removal is possible for the majority of intensive care computer groups. We assessed the effects of artifact and its removal on the physiological data of 3 patients. Artifact was manually removed from 7 days of data in 4 parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure [sbp] and transcutaneous oxygen [tcpO2]) by 3 independent observers. Six hour time periods were analysed. Median and mean values before and after the manual removal of artifact were compared. Overall 6.5% of data was removed as artifact. This was greatest for tcpO2 (9.9%) and sbp (10.6%), with smaller amounts for respiratory rate (2.8%) and heart rate (2.4%). Sbp showed a marked difference in the amount of data removed between patients, whereas tcpO2 data contained quite large volumes of artifact, but this was fairly consistent between patients. Removal of artifact affected mean values more than median values. One observer considered that both physiological and non-physiological artifact should be removed, whereas the other two observers removed only non-physiological artifact. Agreement in results between the latter was good. Our results suggest that inter-observer variability should have a minimal effect on values, once rules identifying the type of artifact to be removed are agreed. Removal of artifact did not have a clinically significant effect on results, but may be an important consideration in the statistical analysis of computerised physiological data.</p>","PeriodicalId":77181,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","volume":"11 4","pages":"211-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01139872","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The practical management of artifact in computerised physiological data.\",\"authors\":\"S Cunningham,&nbsp;A G Symon,&nbsp;N McIntosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF01139872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Computerised physiological data contains artifact that needs to be identified and possibly removed. Whilst computers may eventually satisfactorily perform this function, at present only manual removal is possible for the majority of intensive care computer groups. We assessed the effects of artifact and its removal on the physiological data of 3 patients. Artifact was manually removed from 7 days of data in 4 parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure [sbp] and transcutaneous oxygen [tcpO2]) by 3 independent observers. Six hour time periods were analysed. Median and mean values before and after the manual removal of artifact were compared. Overall 6.5% of data was removed as artifact. This was greatest for tcpO2 (9.9%) and sbp (10.6%), with smaller amounts for respiratory rate (2.8%) and heart rate (2.4%). Sbp showed a marked difference in the amount of data removed between patients, whereas tcpO2 data contained quite large volumes of artifact, but this was fairly consistent between patients. Removal of artifact affected mean values more than median values. One observer considered that both physiological and non-physiological artifact should be removed, whereas the other two observers removed only non-physiological artifact. Agreement in results between the latter was good. Our results suggest that inter-observer variability should have a minimal effect on values, once rules identifying the type of artifact to be removed are agreed. Removal of artifact did not have a clinically significant effect on results, but may be an important consideration in the statistical analysis of computerised physiological data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"211-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF01139872\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical monitoring and computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01139872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

计算机化的生理数据包含需要识别和可能删除的伪影。虽然计算机最终可能会令人满意地执行此功能,但目前大多数重症监护计算机组只能手动移除。我们评估了伪影及其去除对3例患者生理数据的影响。由3名独立观测者手动从7天的4个参数(心率、呼吸频率、收缩压[sbp]和经皮氧[tcpO2])数据中去除伪影。研究人员分析了6个小时的时间段。比较人工去除伪影前后的中位数和平均值。总的来说,6.5%的数据作为工件被删除。tpo2(9.9%)和收缩压(10.6%)最大,呼吸率(2.8%)和心率(2.4%)较小。收缩压在患者之间显示出明显的数据量差异,而tcpO2数据包含相当大的伪影量,但这在患者之间是相当一致的。去除伪影对平均值的影响大于中位数。一个观察者认为生理和非生理伪影都应该被移除,而另外两个观察者只移除非生理伪影。后者的结果很一致。我们的结果表明,一旦确定要删除的人工制品类型的规则被同意,观察者之间的可变性应该对值有最小的影响。去除伪影对结果没有显著的临床影响,但在计算机化生理数据的统计分析中可能是一个重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The practical management of artifact in computerised physiological data.

Computerised physiological data contains artifact that needs to be identified and possibly removed. Whilst computers may eventually satisfactorily perform this function, at present only manual removal is possible for the majority of intensive care computer groups. We assessed the effects of artifact and its removal on the physiological data of 3 patients. Artifact was manually removed from 7 days of data in 4 parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure [sbp] and transcutaneous oxygen [tcpO2]) by 3 independent observers. Six hour time periods were analysed. Median and mean values before and after the manual removal of artifact were compared. Overall 6.5% of data was removed as artifact. This was greatest for tcpO2 (9.9%) and sbp (10.6%), with smaller amounts for respiratory rate (2.8%) and heart rate (2.4%). Sbp showed a marked difference in the amount of data removed between patients, whereas tcpO2 data contained quite large volumes of artifact, but this was fairly consistent between patients. Removal of artifact affected mean values more than median values. One observer considered that both physiological and non-physiological artifact should be removed, whereas the other two observers removed only non-physiological artifact. Agreement in results between the latter was good. Our results suggest that inter-observer variability should have a minimal effect on values, once rules identifying the type of artifact to be removed are agreed. Removal of artifact did not have a clinically significant effect on results, but may be an important consideration in the statistical analysis of computerised physiological data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信