[国家戒毒信息系统治疗指标质量评价]。

Revista de sanidad e higiene publica Pub Date : 1993-09-01
{"title":"[国家戒毒信息系统治疗指标质量评价]。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Spain, the problems caused by cocaine and opiates consumption are monitored through the State Information System on Drug Abuse (SEIT); one of its indicators is the number of admissions for ambulatory treatment for these drugs abuse/addiction (Treatment Indicator).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The information quality of this indicator was evaluated retrospectively during 1988 by comparing the data notified to SEIT with those registered in the treatment centres. For that, a random sample of cases among the clinical records from the notifying centres, and another among the cases registered in the SEIT Central Unit, were selected and crossed, calculating the precision and concordance indexes and observing the possible differences between both samples. In addition, mechanisms of notification and information organization were examined in the selected centres.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1988, at state level, the sensibility was 81% and the predictive positive value 96%. As a whole, the SEIT underestimated the number of cases by 16%. Although the sample was not representative by Autonomous Communities, important between-regions differences in precision were observed. No significant differences of the information quality were found in relation to the centre size (although quality was lower in small centres) nor between the \"true cases\" notified and those not notified. Disparities, among centres, in relation to mechanisms of notification and information organization were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SEIT is of a great value to know the characteristics of the persons treated for opiates or cocaine in Spain; but the between-regions variations on its precision might limit seriously geographic comparisons in the number of cases. It is necessary to evaluate periodically the indicator quality and to improve the consistency of data registration mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":76450,"journal":{"name":"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica","volume":"67 5","pages":"385-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of the quality of the treatment indicator of the State Information System on Drug Addiction].\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Spain, the problems caused by cocaine and opiates consumption are monitored through the State Information System on Drug Abuse (SEIT); one of its indicators is the number of admissions for ambulatory treatment for these drugs abuse/addiction (Treatment Indicator).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The information quality of this indicator was evaluated retrospectively during 1988 by comparing the data notified to SEIT with those registered in the treatment centres. For that, a random sample of cases among the clinical records from the notifying centres, and another among the cases registered in the SEIT Central Unit, were selected and crossed, calculating the precision and concordance indexes and observing the possible differences between both samples. In addition, mechanisms of notification and information organization were examined in the selected centres.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1988, at state level, the sensibility was 81% and the predictive positive value 96%. As a whole, the SEIT underestimated the number of cases by 16%. Although the sample was not representative by Autonomous Communities, important between-regions differences in precision were observed. No significant differences of the information quality were found in relation to the centre size (although quality was lower in small centres) nor between the \\\"true cases\\\" notified and those not notified. Disparities, among centres, in relation to mechanisms of notification and information organization were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SEIT is of a great value to know the characteristics of the persons treated for opiates or cocaine in Spain; but the between-regions variations on its precision might limit seriously geographic comparisons in the number of cases. It is necessary to evaluate periodically the indicator quality and to improve the consistency of data registration mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"385-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在西班牙,通过国家药物滥用信息系统监测可卡因和阿片剂消费所引起的问题;其中一项指标是接受这些药物滥用/成瘾门诊治疗的人数(治疗指标)。方法:1988年期间,通过比较SEIT和治疗中心登记的数据,回顾性评估该指标的信息质量。为此,我们从各报告中心的临床记录中随机抽取病例样本,并从卫生及科技署中央分组登记的病例中抽取另一个病例样本进行交叉,计算精确度和一致性指数,并观察两个样本之间可能存在的差异。此外,在选定的中心审查了通知和信息组织机制。结果:1988年,国家一级的敏感性为81%,预测阳性率为96%。总的来说,SEIT低估了16%的病例数。虽然样本不具有自治区的代表性,但观察到区域间精确度的重要差异。没有发现与中心规模相关的信息质量有显著差异(尽管小中心的质量较低),也没有发现通报的“真实病例”与未通报的“真实病例”之间的信息质量有显著差异。各中心之间在通知和信息组织机制方面存在差异。结论:SEIT对了解西班牙阿片类药物或可卡因患者的特征具有重要价值;但是不同地区之间在精确度上的差异可能会限制对病例数量进行严格的地理比较。有必要定期评估指标质量,提高数据登记机制的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of the quality of the treatment indicator of the State Information System on Drug Addiction].

Background: In Spain, the problems caused by cocaine and opiates consumption are monitored through the State Information System on Drug Abuse (SEIT); one of its indicators is the number of admissions for ambulatory treatment for these drugs abuse/addiction (Treatment Indicator).

Methods: The information quality of this indicator was evaluated retrospectively during 1988 by comparing the data notified to SEIT with those registered in the treatment centres. For that, a random sample of cases among the clinical records from the notifying centres, and another among the cases registered in the SEIT Central Unit, were selected and crossed, calculating the precision and concordance indexes and observing the possible differences between both samples. In addition, mechanisms of notification and information organization were examined in the selected centres.

Results: In 1988, at state level, the sensibility was 81% and the predictive positive value 96%. As a whole, the SEIT underestimated the number of cases by 16%. Although the sample was not representative by Autonomous Communities, important between-regions differences in precision were observed. No significant differences of the information quality were found in relation to the centre size (although quality was lower in small centres) nor between the "true cases" notified and those not notified. Disparities, among centres, in relation to mechanisms of notification and information organization were found.

Conclusions: The SEIT is of a great value to know the characteristics of the persons treated for opiates or cocaine in Spain; but the between-regions variations on its precision might limit seriously geographic comparisons in the number of cases. It is necessary to evaluate periodically the indicator quality and to improve the consistency of data registration mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信