{"title":"计算机辅助x线骨密度测定(CXD)评估桡骨远端骨密度","authors":"Gwy Suk Seo , Masataka Shiraki , Choju Aoki , Jui-Tung Chen , Jun Aoki , Kazuo Imose , Yasuo Togawa , Tetsuo Inoue","doi":"10.1016/S0169-6009(08)80191-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A modified and improved radiographic absorptiometry of the distal radius which enables on-site analysis, called computer assisted X-ray densitometry (CXD), was evaluated from the viewpoint of quality assessment. Its precision and the correlation with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated in 12 volunteers (mean age 44.7 years). The profile of CXD-measured radial bone mineral density (RBMD) from 142 subjects (75 premenopausal and 67 postmenopausal women, mean ages 44.9 and 50.6 years, respectively) were compared with previous data by other methodologies of bone mineral analysis. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 0.617%, the inter-assay CV was 2.064%, and the inter-observer CV was 0.673%o. The correlation between CXD-measured RBMD and DXA-measured RBMD was of statistical significance (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.733, <em>P</em> < 0.01). The correlation of CXD-measured RBMD with age, height or weight corresponded well with previous reports. CXD-measured RBMD and DXA-measured vertebral bone mineral density (VBMD) also had a significant positive correlation, but their correlation was not so close (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.149, <em>P</em> < 0.01). The discriminative ability of osteoporosis by CXD was of acceptable level (odd's ratio = 5.72, <em>P</em> < 0.05), when assessed by comparison with bone dystrophy score (BDS) on the plain vertebral radiogram. Although some problems remain in technical standardization, CXD could be an easy, inexpensive, and widely applicable alternative of non-weight bearing cancellous bone densitometry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77047,"journal":{"name":"Bone and mineral","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 173-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0169-6009(08)80191-2","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of bone density in the distal radius with computer assisted X-ray densitometry (CXD)\",\"authors\":\"Gwy Suk Seo , Masataka Shiraki , Choju Aoki , Jui-Tung Chen , Jun Aoki , Kazuo Imose , Yasuo Togawa , Tetsuo Inoue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0169-6009(08)80191-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A modified and improved radiographic absorptiometry of the distal radius which enables on-site analysis, called computer assisted X-ray densitometry (CXD), was evaluated from the viewpoint of quality assessment. Its precision and the correlation with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated in 12 volunteers (mean age 44.7 years). The profile of CXD-measured radial bone mineral density (RBMD) from 142 subjects (75 premenopausal and 67 postmenopausal women, mean ages 44.9 and 50.6 years, respectively) were compared with previous data by other methodologies of bone mineral analysis. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 0.617%, the inter-assay CV was 2.064%, and the inter-observer CV was 0.673%o. The correlation between CXD-measured RBMD and DXA-measured RBMD was of statistical significance (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.733, <em>P</em> < 0.01). The correlation of CXD-measured RBMD with age, height or weight corresponded well with previous reports. CXD-measured RBMD and DXA-measured vertebral bone mineral density (VBMD) also had a significant positive correlation, but their correlation was not so close (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.149, <em>P</em> < 0.01). The discriminative ability of osteoporosis by CXD was of acceptable level (odd's ratio = 5.72, <em>P</em> < 0.05), when assessed by comparison with bone dystrophy score (BDS) on the plain vertebral radiogram. Although some problems remain in technical standardization, CXD could be an easy, inexpensive, and widely applicable alternative of non-weight bearing cancellous bone densitometry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone and mineral\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 173-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0169-6009(08)80191-2\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone and mineral\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169600908801912\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone and mineral","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169600908801912","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
摘要
从质量评价的角度评价了一种改进和改进的桡骨远端放射吸收测定法,即计算机辅助x射线密度测定法(CXD),该方法可以进行现场分析。在12名志愿者(平均年龄44.7岁)中评估了其精度及其与双能x线吸收仪(DXA)的相关性。142名受试者(75名绝经前妇女和67名绝经后妇女,平均年龄分别为44.9岁和50.6岁)通过其他骨矿物质分析方法比较了cxd测量的桡骨骨密度(RBMD)。试验内变异系数(CV)为0.617%,试验间CV为2.064%,观察者间CV为0.673%。cxd测量的RBMD与dxa测量的RBMD的相关性有统计学意义(r2 = 0.733, P <0.01)。cxd测量的RBMD与年龄、身高或体重的相关性与先前的报道相吻合。cxd测量的RBMD与dxa测量的椎体骨密度(VBMD)也有显著的正相关,但相关性不是很密切(r2 = 0.149, P <0.01)。CXD对骨质疏松症的鉴别能力处于可接受水平(odd’s ratio = 5.72, P <0.05),与椎体平片骨营养不良评分(BDS)比较。虽然在技术标准化方面还存在一些问题,但CXD可能是一种简单、廉价、广泛适用的非承重松质骨密度测量的替代方法。
Assessment of bone density in the distal radius with computer assisted X-ray densitometry (CXD)
A modified and improved radiographic absorptiometry of the distal radius which enables on-site analysis, called computer assisted X-ray densitometry (CXD), was evaluated from the viewpoint of quality assessment. Its precision and the correlation with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated in 12 volunteers (mean age 44.7 years). The profile of CXD-measured radial bone mineral density (RBMD) from 142 subjects (75 premenopausal and 67 postmenopausal women, mean ages 44.9 and 50.6 years, respectively) were compared with previous data by other methodologies of bone mineral analysis. The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 0.617%, the inter-assay CV was 2.064%, and the inter-observer CV was 0.673%o. The correlation between CXD-measured RBMD and DXA-measured RBMD was of statistical significance (r2 = 0.733, P < 0.01). The correlation of CXD-measured RBMD with age, height or weight corresponded well with previous reports. CXD-measured RBMD and DXA-measured vertebral bone mineral density (VBMD) also had a significant positive correlation, but their correlation was not so close (r2 = 0.149, P < 0.01). The discriminative ability of osteoporosis by CXD was of acceptable level (odd's ratio = 5.72, P < 0.05), when assessed by comparison with bone dystrophy score (BDS) on the plain vertebral radiogram. Although some problems remain in technical standardization, CXD could be an easy, inexpensive, and widely applicable alternative of non-weight bearing cancellous bone densitometry.