妇女对分娩表现的评价。

Maternal-child nursing journal Pub Date : 1995-04-01
M C Mackey
{"title":"妇女对分娩表现的评价。","authors":"M C Mackey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe women's evaluation of their own performance during labor and delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N = 60) were Lamaze-prepared, married multigravidae, aged 21-37 years who responded to open-ended questions in tape-recorded interviews during their postpartum hospital stay. Qualitative data analysis was used to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Women evaluated their childbirth performance as managing well (45%), having difficulty (35%), and managing poorly (20%). The following helped them to manage well: short, fast labors; minimal pain; Lamaze; husband's encouragement; being informed; feeling strong; medication; and nurses' and physicians' encouragement, help with Lamaze, and information. Women who had managed well before and who were confident about managing well again tended to evaluate their childbirth performance positively. A significant difference was seen in mean labor length: Women who managed well had the shortest labors and women who managed poorly had the longest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions & implications for nursing: </strong>The women confirmed the notion that they had important work to do; they identified their own performance as one of the most important or the most important component of the childbirth experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":76125,"journal":{"name":"Maternal-child nursing journal","volume":"23 2","pages":"57-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women's evaluation of their childbirth performance.\",\"authors\":\"M C Mackey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe women's evaluation of their own performance during labor and delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N = 60) were Lamaze-prepared, married multigravidae, aged 21-37 years who responded to open-ended questions in tape-recorded interviews during their postpartum hospital stay. Qualitative data analysis was used to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Women evaluated their childbirth performance as managing well (45%), having difficulty (35%), and managing poorly (20%). The following helped them to manage well: short, fast labors; minimal pain; Lamaze; husband's encouragement; being informed; feeling strong; medication; and nurses' and physicians' encouragement, help with Lamaze, and information. Women who had managed well before and who were confident about managing well again tended to evaluate their childbirth performance positively. A significant difference was seen in mean labor length: Women who managed well had the shortest labors and women who managed poorly had the longest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions & implications for nursing: </strong>The women confirmed the notion that they had important work to do; they identified their own performance as one of the most important or the most important component of the childbirth experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal-child nursing journal\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"57-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal-child nursing journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal-child nursing journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨产妇在分娩过程中对自身表现的评价。方法:参与者(N = 60)是年龄21-37岁的已婚多胎孕妇,在产后住院期间通过录音访谈回答开放式问题。定性数据分析用于确定主题。研究结果:妇女对分娩表现的评价为管理良好(45%)、困难(35%)和管理不良(20%)。以下几点帮助他们管理得很好:短而快的劳动力;最小的痛苦;无痛分娩法;丈夫的鼓励;被告知;感觉强烈;药物治疗;护士和医生的鼓励,拉梅兹的帮助和信息。那些在分娩前处理得很好的女性,以及那些有信心再次处理得很好的女性,往往会积极地评价自己的分娩表现。在平均分娩时间上有显著的差异:管理得好的女性分娩时间最短,管理得不好的女性分娩时间最长。结论及对护理的启示:女性确认了她们有重要工作要做的观念;她们认为自己的表现是分娩过程中最重要的因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women's evaluation of their childbirth performance.

Objective: To describe women's evaluation of their own performance during labor and delivery.

Methods: Participants (N = 60) were Lamaze-prepared, married multigravidae, aged 21-37 years who responded to open-ended questions in tape-recorded interviews during their postpartum hospital stay. Qualitative data analysis was used to identify themes.

Findings: Women evaluated their childbirth performance as managing well (45%), having difficulty (35%), and managing poorly (20%). The following helped them to manage well: short, fast labors; minimal pain; Lamaze; husband's encouragement; being informed; feeling strong; medication; and nurses' and physicians' encouragement, help with Lamaze, and information. Women who had managed well before and who were confident about managing well again tended to evaluate their childbirth performance positively. A significant difference was seen in mean labor length: Women who managed well had the shortest labors and women who managed poorly had the longest.

Conclusions & implications for nursing: The women confirmed the notion that they had important work to do; they identified their own performance as one of the most important or the most important component of the childbirth experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信