[马德里初级保健保健专业人员对保健服务合同的接受程度:一项定性研究]。

Revista de sanidad e higiene publica Pub Date : 1995-01-01
C Pérez Andrés
{"title":"[马德里初级保健保健专业人员对保健服务合同的接受程度:一项定性研究]。","authors":"C Pérez Andrés","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this paper is to study whether the Contrato Programa-based management formula between INSALUD and Primary Care Managerships (CP) is known by INSALUD-Madrid primary care physicians and nurses, as well as which factors are influencing its acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative-based analysis and interpretation of the discussion had in five health personnel groups was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Health Service Contract is known by primary care health personnel as \"self-management\". This word induces them to think in the management of teams by their physicians themselves. Based on this self-management, physicians would plan staffs with minimal representation of nurses personnel, in exchange for increasing medical and administrative personnel, which in fact would solve their main problems, i.e. attendance pressure and bureaucracy, in addition to relationships with nurses. Determinants of this response relate to the satisfaction level with the Primary Care Reform attained by these collectives. This Reform has produced a \"subjective equality\" in both collectives, conditioned by fault in authority by physicians, which is desired by nurses and rejected by physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health Service Contract in Primary Care is generally accepted by physicians, except for pediatricians, and rejected by nurses. Reasons are related to the ability from both collectives to recuperate the difference between them.</p>","PeriodicalId":76450,"journal":{"name":"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica","volume":"69 1","pages":"79-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The acceptability of the health services contract by the primary care health professionals in Madrid: a qualitative research].\",\"authors\":\"C Pérez Andrés\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this paper is to study whether the Contrato Programa-based management formula between INSALUD and Primary Care Managerships (CP) is known by INSALUD-Madrid primary care physicians and nurses, as well as which factors are influencing its acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative-based analysis and interpretation of the discussion had in five health personnel groups was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Health Service Contract is known by primary care health personnel as \\\"self-management\\\". This word induces them to think in the management of teams by their physicians themselves. Based on this self-management, physicians would plan staffs with minimal representation of nurses personnel, in exchange for increasing medical and administrative personnel, which in fact would solve their main problems, i.e. attendance pressure and bureaucracy, in addition to relationships with nurses. Determinants of this response relate to the satisfaction level with the Primary Care Reform attained by these collectives. This Reform has produced a \\\"subjective equality\\\" in both collectives, conditioned by fault in authority by physicians, which is desired by nurses and rejected by physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health Service Contract in Primary Care is generally accepted by physicians, except for pediatricians, and rejected by nurses. Reasons are related to the ability from both collectives to recuperate the difference between them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"79-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de sanidad e higiene publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文的目的是研究INSALUD和初级保健管理人员(CP)之间基于contrto program的管理公式是否为INSALUD- madrid初级保健医生和护士所熟知,以及哪些因素影响其可接受性。方法:对五组卫生人员的讨论进行定性分析和解释。结果:卫生服务合同被基层卫生保健人员称为“自我管理”。这个词促使他们思考由他们的医生自己管理团队。在这种自我管理的基础上,医生会计划人员中护士人员的代表性最低,以换取增加医疗和行政人员,这实际上可以解决他们的主要问题,即出勤压力和官僚主义,以及与护士的关系。这一反应的决定因素与这些集体对初级保健改革的满意度有关。这一改革在两个集体中产生了一种“主观平等”,以医生的权威过失为条件,这是护士所希望的,也是医生所拒绝的。结论:初级保健卫生服务合同除儿科医生外,一般被医生接受,护士拒绝。原因与两个集体弥补彼此差异的能力有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The acceptability of the health services contract by the primary care health professionals in Madrid: a qualitative research].

Background: The objective of this paper is to study whether the Contrato Programa-based management formula between INSALUD and Primary Care Managerships (CP) is known by INSALUD-Madrid primary care physicians and nurses, as well as which factors are influencing its acceptability.

Methods: Qualitative-based analysis and interpretation of the discussion had in five health personnel groups was used.

Results: The Health Service Contract is known by primary care health personnel as "self-management". This word induces them to think in the management of teams by their physicians themselves. Based on this self-management, physicians would plan staffs with minimal representation of nurses personnel, in exchange for increasing medical and administrative personnel, which in fact would solve their main problems, i.e. attendance pressure and bureaucracy, in addition to relationships with nurses. Determinants of this response relate to the satisfaction level with the Primary Care Reform attained by these collectives. This Reform has produced a "subjective equality" in both collectives, conditioned by fault in authority by physicians, which is desired by nurses and rejected by physicians.

Conclusions: Health Service Contract in Primary Care is generally accepted by physicians, except for pediatricians, and rejected by nurses. Reasons are related to the ability from both collectives to recuperate the difference between them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信