内镜下评价尼美舒利和双氯芬酸对骨关节炎患者胃黏膜耐受性的双盲研究。

A Porto, H Almeida, M J Cunha, A Macciocchi
{"title":"内镜下评价尼美舒利和双氯芬酸对骨关节炎患者胃黏膜耐受性的双盲研究。","authors":"A Porto,&nbsp;H Almeida,&nbsp;M J Cunha,&nbsp;A Macciocchi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gastric tolerability of nimesulide, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), was compared with diclofenac, an established NSAID for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). A randomised, double-blind parallel group study was undertaken comparing the tolerability and efficacy of nimesulide (100 mg bds) with diclofenac (50 mg tds) over a one month period. Gastroduodenal endoscopy revealed that after 30 days 4 patients had developed ulcers (1 nimesulide patient) and 6 patients had developed erosions (4 nimesulide patients). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments. Both drugs were clinically very well tolerated and only 10 patients withdrew from the study due to adverse events (5 in each group). Efficacy was assessed by measuring pain on visual analogue scales, by means of the functional index of Lequesne and by scoring spontaneous pain, pain on passive movement and functional impairment. Nocturnal pain was also checked. All efficacy parameters showed a significant improvement during the study without any observed treatment differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12056,"journal":{"name":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","volume":"14 4","pages":"33-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double-blind study evaluating by endoscopy the tolerability of nimesulide and diclofenac on the gastric mucosa in osteoarthritic patients.\",\"authors\":\"A Porto,&nbsp;H Almeida,&nbsp;M J Cunha,&nbsp;A Macciocchi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The gastric tolerability of nimesulide, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), was compared with diclofenac, an established NSAID for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). A randomised, double-blind parallel group study was undertaken comparing the tolerability and efficacy of nimesulide (100 mg bds) with diclofenac (50 mg tds) over a one month period. Gastroduodenal endoscopy revealed that after 30 days 4 patients had developed ulcers (1 nimesulide patient) and 6 patients had developed erosions (4 nimesulide patients). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments. Both drugs were clinically very well tolerated and only 10 patients withdrew from the study due to adverse events (5 in each group). Efficacy was assessed by measuring pain on visual analogue scales, by means of the functional index of Lequesne and by scoring spontaneous pain, pain on passive movement and functional impairment. Nocturnal pain was also checked. All efficacy parameters showed a significant improvement during the study without any observed treatment differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"33-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of rheumatology and inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尼美舒利(一种新型非甾体抗炎药)与双氯芬酸(一种治疗骨关节炎的非甾体抗炎药)的胃耐受性进行了比较。进行了一项随机、双盲平行组研究,比较尼美舒利(100mg /天)和双氯芬酸(50mg /天)在一个月期间的耐受性和疗效。胃十二指肠内窥镜检查显示,30天后4例患者出现溃疡(1例尼美舒利),6例患者出现糜烂(4例尼美舒利)。然而,两种治疗之间没有统计学上的显著差异。两种药物的临床耐受性都很好,仅有10例患者因不良事件退出研究(每组5例)。通过视觉模拟量表测量疼痛、Lequesne功能指数、自发性疼痛、被动运动疼痛和功能损害评分来评估疗效。还检查了夜间疼痛。在研究期间,所有疗效参数均有显著改善,未观察到治疗差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double-blind study evaluating by endoscopy the tolerability of nimesulide and diclofenac on the gastric mucosa in osteoarthritic patients.

The gastric tolerability of nimesulide, a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), was compared with diclofenac, an established NSAID for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). A randomised, double-blind parallel group study was undertaken comparing the tolerability and efficacy of nimesulide (100 mg bds) with diclofenac (50 mg tds) over a one month period. Gastroduodenal endoscopy revealed that after 30 days 4 patients had developed ulcers (1 nimesulide patient) and 6 patients had developed erosions (4 nimesulide patients). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two treatments. Both drugs were clinically very well tolerated and only 10 patients withdrew from the study due to adverse events (5 in each group). Efficacy was assessed by measuring pain on visual analogue scales, by means of the functional index of Lequesne and by scoring spontaneous pain, pain on passive movement and functional impairment. Nocturnal pain was also checked. All efficacy parameters showed a significant improvement during the study without any observed treatment differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信