急性呼吸衰竭的替代通气方式。

Surgery annual Pub Date : 1995-01-01
F J Cole, B A Shouse
{"title":"急性呼吸衰竭的替代通气方式。","authors":"F J Cole,&nbsp;B A Shouse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute respiratory failure continues to complicate the management of critically ill trauma and surgical patients. Despite an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of this process, there is no golden bullet with which to stop or reverse it. Management remains directed toward maintenance of gas exchange and minimizing complications until such time as the process that initiated the respiratory failure has resolved and the lungs have an opportunity to recover. Continuous positive pressure ventilation with PEEP and oxygen is the conventional modality for achieving this goal. It is apparent that some patients are refractory to this therapy. In addition, there is evidence that alveolar injury may occur as a result of increasing airway pressures and shear forces. These authors have reviewed a number of modalities that seek to address these issues. IRV, whether pressure or volume controlled, appears at least able to provide adequate gas exchange in some patients who are refractory to conventional therapies. The same appears to be true for pressure control ventilation, airway pressure release ventilation, and volume control ventilation with a modified decelerating flow waveform. Whether any of these modalities will prove to alter outcome with respect to mortality remains to be seen. Work continues in the arena of extrapulmonary oxygenation. Results of recent studies are improved compared to the results of the NIH trial reflecting advances in technology, technique, and experience. The IVOX is a fascinating device that has been shown to effectively transfer respiratory gases, as has perfluorocarbon associated gas exchange. Whether these technologies will find a role in the treatment of adult respiratory failure awaits further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":76570,"journal":{"name":"Surgery annual","volume":"27 ","pages":"55-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative modalities of ventilation in acute respiratory failure.\",\"authors\":\"F J Cole,&nbsp;B A Shouse\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acute respiratory failure continues to complicate the management of critically ill trauma and surgical patients. Despite an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of this process, there is no golden bullet with which to stop or reverse it. Management remains directed toward maintenance of gas exchange and minimizing complications until such time as the process that initiated the respiratory failure has resolved and the lungs have an opportunity to recover. Continuous positive pressure ventilation with PEEP and oxygen is the conventional modality for achieving this goal. It is apparent that some patients are refractory to this therapy. In addition, there is evidence that alveolar injury may occur as a result of increasing airway pressures and shear forces. These authors have reviewed a number of modalities that seek to address these issues. IRV, whether pressure or volume controlled, appears at least able to provide adequate gas exchange in some patients who are refractory to conventional therapies. The same appears to be true for pressure control ventilation, airway pressure release ventilation, and volume control ventilation with a modified decelerating flow waveform. Whether any of these modalities will prove to alter outcome with respect to mortality remains to be seen. Work continues in the arena of extrapulmonary oxygenation. Results of recent studies are improved compared to the results of the NIH trial reflecting advances in technology, technique, and experience. The IVOX is a fascinating device that has been shown to effectively transfer respiratory gases, as has perfluorocarbon associated gas exchange. Whether these technologies will find a role in the treatment of adult respiratory failure awaits further study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery annual\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"55-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery annual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery annual","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性呼吸衰竭继续复杂化重症外伤和外科病人的管理。尽管人们对这一过程的病理生理学有了越来越多的了解,但目前还没有阻止或逆转这一过程的灵丹妙药。在引起呼吸衰竭的过程得到解决,肺部有机会恢复之前,治疗的方向仍然是维持气体交换和尽量减少并发症。持续正压通气与PEEP和氧气是实现这一目标的常规方式。很明显,有些病人对这种治疗是难治的。此外,有证据表明,气道压力和剪切力的增加可能导致肺泡损伤。这些作者回顾了一些寻求解决这些问题的模式。IRV,无论是控制压力还是控制容积,似乎至少能够为一些难以接受常规治疗的患者提供足够的气体交换。对于压力控制通气、气道压力释放通气和带有改进的减速流波形的容积控制通气,似乎也是如此。这些模式是否会改变死亡率方面的结果还有待观察。肺外氧合领域的工作仍在继续。与NIH的试验结果相比,最近的研究结果有所改善,反映了技术、技术和经验的进步。IVOX是一种令人着迷的设备,已被证明可以有效地转移呼吸气体,就像全氟碳相关气体交换一样。这些技术是否会在成人呼吸衰竭的治疗中发挥作用还有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative modalities of ventilation in acute respiratory failure.

Acute respiratory failure continues to complicate the management of critically ill trauma and surgical patients. Despite an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of this process, there is no golden bullet with which to stop or reverse it. Management remains directed toward maintenance of gas exchange and minimizing complications until such time as the process that initiated the respiratory failure has resolved and the lungs have an opportunity to recover. Continuous positive pressure ventilation with PEEP and oxygen is the conventional modality for achieving this goal. It is apparent that some patients are refractory to this therapy. In addition, there is evidence that alveolar injury may occur as a result of increasing airway pressures and shear forces. These authors have reviewed a number of modalities that seek to address these issues. IRV, whether pressure or volume controlled, appears at least able to provide adequate gas exchange in some patients who are refractory to conventional therapies. The same appears to be true for pressure control ventilation, airway pressure release ventilation, and volume control ventilation with a modified decelerating flow waveform. Whether any of these modalities will prove to alter outcome with respect to mortality remains to be seen. Work continues in the arena of extrapulmonary oxygenation. Results of recent studies are improved compared to the results of the NIH trial reflecting advances in technology, technique, and experience. The IVOX is a fascinating device that has been shown to effectively transfer respiratory gases, as has perfluorocarbon associated gas exchange. Whether these technologies will find a role in the treatment of adult respiratory failure awaits further study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信