J C Ruiz, A Tamborini, P Neftel, B Bosio-Le Goux, F Lecuru, R Taurelle
{"title":"[骨对激素替代疗法反应的可变性]。","authors":"J C Ruiz, A Tamborini, P Neftel, B Bosio-Le Goux, F Lecuru, R Taurelle","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone response to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was assessed in a retrospective longitudinal study. 115 women started on HRT for the first time and 252 controls underwent initial densitometric evaluation (spine and femur) and a second evaluation on average 29 months later. Patients were classified as post-menopausal or perimenopausal according to whether they had had more or less than 6 months amenorrhea. Oral or non-oral 17-beta estradiol was used at the dose generally accepted to be skeletally protective. In the post-menopausal group, prescription of HRT was followed by spinal and femoral bone gain (+ 2.85% and + 1.06% per year respectively). There was no bone gain with HRT in the peri-menopausal women, but the stability seen contrasted greatly with the very marked bone loss found in controls (spine - 3.09% per year and femur - 1.78% per year). Lumbar densitometric variations were correlated, at least in the post-menopausal group, with those in the femur, but the amplitude of femoral variations was half that of the spine. Body mass index (BMI) was not found to be a predictive factor of bone response to HRT in this group, but the time since the menopause and initial densitometric results were. For the spine, the % of subjects losing their bone mass in response to the start of HRT, nil in the post-menopausal group, was 16% in peri-menopausal women. The % of good responders increased from 8% peri-menopausally to more than 59% 2 years after the menopause. The response in the femur appeared to be very different, with 20% good responders and a % of stable subjects similar to that of the control group. Femoral variations and the existence regarding the spine of a group showing no or only a poor response to HRT would be in favor of densitometric monitoring when initial bone mass is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":21300,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Variability of bone response to hormone replacement therapy].\",\"authors\":\"J C Ruiz, A Tamborini, P Neftel, B Bosio-Le Goux, F Lecuru, R Taurelle\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bone response to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was assessed in a retrospective longitudinal study. 115 women started on HRT for the first time and 252 controls underwent initial densitometric evaluation (spine and femur) and a second evaluation on average 29 months later. Patients were classified as post-menopausal or perimenopausal according to whether they had had more or less than 6 months amenorrhea. Oral or non-oral 17-beta estradiol was used at the dose generally accepted to be skeletally protective. In the post-menopausal group, prescription of HRT was followed by spinal and femoral bone gain (+ 2.85% and + 1.06% per year respectively). There was no bone gain with HRT in the peri-menopausal women, but the stability seen contrasted greatly with the very marked bone loss found in controls (spine - 3.09% per year and femur - 1.78% per year). Lumbar densitometric variations were correlated, at least in the post-menopausal group, with those in the femur, but the amplitude of femoral variations was half that of the spine. Body mass index (BMI) was not found to be a predictive factor of bone response to HRT in this group, but the time since the menopause and initial densitometric results were. For the spine, the % of subjects losing their bone mass in response to the start of HRT, nil in the post-menopausal group, was 16% in peri-menopausal women. The % of good responders increased from 8% peri-menopausally to more than 59% 2 years after the menopause. The response in the femur appeared to be very different, with 20% good responders and a % of stable subjects similar to that of the control group. Femoral variations and the existence regarding the spine of a group showing no or only a poor response to HRT would be in favor of densitometric monitoring when initial bone mass is low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Variability of bone response to hormone replacement therapy].
Bone response to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was assessed in a retrospective longitudinal study. 115 women started on HRT for the first time and 252 controls underwent initial densitometric evaluation (spine and femur) and a second evaluation on average 29 months later. Patients were classified as post-menopausal or perimenopausal according to whether they had had more or less than 6 months amenorrhea. Oral or non-oral 17-beta estradiol was used at the dose generally accepted to be skeletally protective. In the post-menopausal group, prescription of HRT was followed by spinal and femoral bone gain (+ 2.85% and + 1.06% per year respectively). There was no bone gain with HRT in the peri-menopausal women, but the stability seen contrasted greatly with the very marked bone loss found in controls (spine - 3.09% per year and femur - 1.78% per year). Lumbar densitometric variations were correlated, at least in the post-menopausal group, with those in the femur, but the amplitude of femoral variations was half that of the spine. Body mass index (BMI) was not found to be a predictive factor of bone response to HRT in this group, but the time since the menopause and initial densitometric results were. For the spine, the % of subjects losing their bone mass in response to the start of HRT, nil in the post-menopausal group, was 16% in peri-menopausal women. The % of good responders increased from 8% peri-menopausally to more than 59% 2 years after the menopause. The response in the femur appeared to be very different, with 20% good responders and a % of stable subjects similar to that of the control group. Femoral variations and the existence regarding the spine of a group showing no or only a poor response to HRT would be in favor of densitometric monitoring when initial bone mass is low.