[骨对激素替代疗法反应的可变性]。

J C Ruiz, A Tamborini, P Neftel, B Bosio-Le Goux, F Lecuru, R Taurelle
{"title":"[骨对激素替代疗法反应的可变性]。","authors":"J C Ruiz,&nbsp;A Tamborini,&nbsp;P Neftel,&nbsp;B Bosio-Le Goux,&nbsp;F Lecuru,&nbsp;R Taurelle","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bone response to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was assessed in a retrospective longitudinal study. 115 women started on HRT for the first time and 252 controls underwent initial densitometric evaluation (spine and femur) and a second evaluation on average 29 months later. Patients were classified as post-menopausal or perimenopausal according to whether they had had more or less than 6 months amenorrhea. Oral or non-oral 17-beta estradiol was used at the dose generally accepted to be skeletally protective. In the post-menopausal group, prescription of HRT was followed by spinal and femoral bone gain (+ 2.85% and + 1.06% per year respectively). There was no bone gain with HRT in the peri-menopausal women, but the stability seen contrasted greatly with the very marked bone loss found in controls (spine - 3.09% per year and femur - 1.78% per year). Lumbar densitometric variations were correlated, at least in the post-menopausal group, with those in the femur, but the amplitude of femoral variations was half that of the spine. Body mass index (BMI) was not found to be a predictive factor of bone response to HRT in this group, but the time since the menopause and initial densitometric results were. For the spine, the % of subjects losing their bone mass in response to the start of HRT, nil in the post-menopausal group, was 16% in peri-menopausal women. The % of good responders increased from 8% peri-menopausally to more than 59% 2 years after the menopause. The response in the femur appeared to be very different, with 20% good responders and a % of stable subjects similar to that of the control group. Femoral variations and the existence regarding the spine of a group showing no or only a poor response to HRT would be in favor of densitometric monitoring when initial bone mass is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":21300,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Variability of bone response to hormone replacement therapy].\",\"authors\":\"J C Ruiz,&nbsp;A Tamborini,&nbsp;P Neftel,&nbsp;B Bosio-Le Goux,&nbsp;F Lecuru,&nbsp;R Taurelle\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bone response to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was assessed in a retrospective longitudinal study. 115 women started on HRT for the first time and 252 controls underwent initial densitometric evaluation (spine and femur) and a second evaluation on average 29 months later. Patients were classified as post-menopausal or perimenopausal according to whether they had had more or less than 6 months amenorrhea. Oral or non-oral 17-beta estradiol was used at the dose generally accepted to be skeletally protective. In the post-menopausal group, prescription of HRT was followed by spinal and femoral bone gain (+ 2.85% and + 1.06% per year respectively). There was no bone gain with HRT in the peri-menopausal women, but the stability seen contrasted greatly with the very marked bone loss found in controls (spine - 3.09% per year and femur - 1.78% per year). Lumbar densitometric variations were correlated, at least in the post-menopausal group, with those in the femur, but the amplitude of femoral variations was half that of the spine. Body mass index (BMI) was not found to be a predictive factor of bone response to HRT in this group, but the time since the menopause and initial densitometric results were. For the spine, the % of subjects losing their bone mass in response to the start of HRT, nil in the post-menopausal group, was 16% in peri-menopausal women. The % of good responders increased from 8% peri-menopausally to more than 59% 2 years after the menopause. The response in the femur appeared to be very different, with 20% good responders and a % of stable subjects similar to that of the control group. Femoral variations and the existence regarding the spine of a group showing no or only a poor response to HRT would be in favor of densitometric monitoring when initial bone mass is low.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项回顾性纵向研究中评估了骨对激素替代疗法(HRT)的反应。115名女性首次接受激素替代疗法,252名对照组接受初始密度测量评估(脊柱和股骨),平均29个月后进行第二次评估。根据患者闭经时间超过或少于6个月,将患者分为绝经后或围绝经期。口服或非口服17- β雌二醇的剂量通常被认为对骨骼有保护作用。在绝经后组,HRT处方后,脊柱和股骨骨增加(分别为每年+ 2.85%和+ 1.06%)。在围绝经期妇女中,HRT没有骨质增加,但稳定性与对照组中非常明显的骨质流失(脊柱-每年3.09%,股骨-每年1.78%)形成鲜明对比。至少在绝经后组中,腰椎密度变化与股骨密度变化相关,但股骨密度变化的幅度是脊柱密度变化的一半。在该组中,体重指数(BMI)未被发现是骨对HRT反应的预测因素,但绝经后的时间和初始密度测量结果是预测因素。对于脊柱,在HRT开始后骨量减少的受试者百分比,绝经后组为零,而在围绝经期妇女中为16%。良好反应的百分比从围绝经期的8%增加到绝经2年后的59%以上。股骨的反应似乎非常不同,有20%的良好反应者和%的稳定受试者与对照组相似。当初始骨量较低时,如果股骨变异和脊柱对HRT没有或只有较差的反应,则有利于进行密度测量监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Variability of bone response to hormone replacement therapy].

Bone response to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was assessed in a retrospective longitudinal study. 115 women started on HRT for the first time and 252 controls underwent initial densitometric evaluation (spine and femur) and a second evaluation on average 29 months later. Patients were classified as post-menopausal or perimenopausal according to whether they had had more or less than 6 months amenorrhea. Oral or non-oral 17-beta estradiol was used at the dose generally accepted to be skeletally protective. In the post-menopausal group, prescription of HRT was followed by spinal and femoral bone gain (+ 2.85% and + 1.06% per year respectively). There was no bone gain with HRT in the peri-menopausal women, but the stability seen contrasted greatly with the very marked bone loss found in controls (spine - 3.09% per year and femur - 1.78% per year). Lumbar densitometric variations were correlated, at least in the post-menopausal group, with those in the femur, but the amplitude of femoral variations was half that of the spine. Body mass index (BMI) was not found to be a predictive factor of bone response to HRT in this group, but the time since the menopause and initial densitometric results were. For the spine, the % of subjects losing their bone mass in response to the start of HRT, nil in the post-menopausal group, was 16% in peri-menopausal women. The % of good responders increased from 8% peri-menopausally to more than 59% 2 years after the menopause. The response in the femur appeared to be very different, with 20% good responders and a % of stable subjects similar to that of the control group. Femoral variations and the existence regarding the spine of a group showing no or only a poor response to HRT would be in favor of densitometric monitoring when initial bone mass is low.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信