无尾肌的氮递质——NO还是NO ?

A Gibson, S R Brave, I McFadzean, J F Tucker, C Wayman
{"title":"无尾肌的氮递质——NO还是NO ?","authors":"A Gibson,&nbsp;S R Brave,&nbsp;I McFadzean,&nbsp;J F Tucker,&nbsp;C Wayman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxations of the anococcygeus muscle are reduced by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Since NOS can be detected within 6-hydroxydodpamine-resistant nerve tracts running through the muscle, it seems clear that these NANC relaxations result from activation of the L-arginine/NO pathway within the prejunctional nerve terminal, an example of so-called \"nitrergic\" transmission. However, a number of substances (hydroquinone, superoxide anions, hydroxocobalamin) profoundly reduce relaxations to exogenous NO but do not affect those to nitrergic field stimulation; such observations have raised questions over the nature of the substance actually released from the nitrergic nerves. Several possible explanations are discussed: (1) NO is released attached to a carrier molecule, perhaps in the form of a nitrosothiol; (2) NO is released in a modified redox form; (3) NO is released as a free radical, but is protected within the neuroeffector junction by other substances which preferentially interact with scavenger molecules; and (4) NO is released as a free radical and, because of a rapid and unhindered rate of diffusion over short distances (100-200 microM), it is less susceptible than exogenous NO to scavenger molecules. As yet, there is insufficient experimental evidence to decide which, if any, of these explanations is correct.</p>","PeriodicalId":8166,"journal":{"name":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","volume":"329 1","pages":"39-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The nitrergic transmitter of the anococcygeus--NO or not?\",\"authors\":\"A Gibson,&nbsp;S R Brave,&nbsp;I McFadzean,&nbsp;J F Tucker,&nbsp;C Wayman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxations of the anococcygeus muscle are reduced by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Since NOS can be detected within 6-hydroxydodpamine-resistant nerve tracts running through the muscle, it seems clear that these NANC relaxations result from activation of the L-arginine/NO pathway within the prejunctional nerve terminal, an example of so-called \\\"nitrergic\\\" transmission. However, a number of substances (hydroquinone, superoxide anions, hydroxocobalamin) profoundly reduce relaxations to exogenous NO but do not affect those to nitrergic field stimulation; such observations have raised questions over the nature of the substance actually released from the nitrergic nerves. Several possible explanations are discussed: (1) NO is released attached to a carrier molecule, perhaps in the form of a nitrosothiol; (2) NO is released in a modified redox form; (3) NO is released as a free radical, but is protected within the neuroeffector junction by other substances which preferentially interact with scavenger molecules; and (4) NO is released as a free radical and, because of a rapid and unhindered rate of diffusion over short distances (100-200 microM), it is less susceptible than exogenous NO to scavenger molecules. As yet, there is insufficient experimental evidence to decide which, if any, of these explanations is correct.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie\",\"volume\":\"329 1\",\"pages\":\"39-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一氧化氮合酶(NOS)抑制剂可降低无尾肌的非肾上腺素能-非胆碱能(NANC)松弛。由于NOS可以在穿过肌肉的6-羟多巴胺抗性神经束中检测到,因此很明显,这些NANC松弛是由突触前神经末梢内l -精氨酸/NO通路的激活引起的,这是所谓的“氮能”传递的一个例子。然而,一些物质(对苯二酚、超氧阴离子、羟钴胺素)深刻地减少对外源性NO的松弛,但不影响对氮场刺激的松弛;这样的观察结果引起了人们对从能神经中释放的物质的性质的质疑。讨论了几种可能的解释:(1)NO附着在载体分子上释放,可能以亚硝基硫醇的形式释放;(2) NO以改性的氧化还原形式释放;(3) NO作为自由基释放,但在神经效应器连接处受到其他物质的保护,这些物质优先与清道夫分子相互作用;(4) NO以自由基的形式释放,由于其在短距离(100-200微米)内的扩散速度迅速且不受阻碍,因此它比外源NO更不容易受到清除剂分子的影响。到目前为止,没有足够的实验证据来决定这些解释中哪一个是正确的,如果有的话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The nitrergic transmitter of the anococcygeus--NO or not?

Nonadrenergic noncholinergic (NANC) relaxations of the anococcygeus muscle are reduced by inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Since NOS can be detected within 6-hydroxydodpamine-resistant nerve tracts running through the muscle, it seems clear that these NANC relaxations result from activation of the L-arginine/NO pathway within the prejunctional nerve terminal, an example of so-called "nitrergic" transmission. However, a number of substances (hydroquinone, superoxide anions, hydroxocobalamin) profoundly reduce relaxations to exogenous NO but do not affect those to nitrergic field stimulation; such observations have raised questions over the nature of the substance actually released from the nitrergic nerves. Several possible explanations are discussed: (1) NO is released attached to a carrier molecule, perhaps in the form of a nitrosothiol; (2) NO is released in a modified redox form; (3) NO is released as a free radical, but is protected within the neuroeffector junction by other substances which preferentially interact with scavenger molecules; and (4) NO is released as a free radical and, because of a rapid and unhindered rate of diffusion over short distances (100-200 microM), it is less susceptible than exogenous NO to scavenger molecules. As yet, there is insufficient experimental evidence to decide which, if any, of these explanations is correct.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信