F Jung, U Bläsi, H Radtke, C Mrowietz, G Pindur, H Kiesewetter, E Wenzel
{"title":"使用不同的细胞分离器诱导血小板反应性的增加。","authors":"F Jung, U Bläsi, H Radtke, C Mrowietz, G Pindur, H Kiesewetter, E Wenzel","doi":"10.1159/000223131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since plateletpheresis is being used increasingly, it is important to regard quality control to check health risks for donors and to exclude these.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Controlled randomised prospective open comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Transfusion Medicine of a University Clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>112 platelet donors were examined.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Prior to and after plateletpheresis platelet reactivity was determined. The platelet concentrates in the two groups of 56 donors each were produced using either the cell separator 'CS-3000' and the collecting chamber PLT 30TM with the Omnix system (group I) or the cell separator 'AS-104' (group II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I five donors showed a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.1297) after plateletpheresis. In group II there were 10 donors with a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.0046) after plateletpheresis. The mean concentration of platelets was reduced by separation using the CS-3000 Omnix from 238 +/- 49 x 10(3)/microliters to 172 +/- 32 x 10(3)/microliters (68 +/- 27 x 10(3)/microliters) and from 243 +/- 53 x 10(3)/microliters to 180 +/- 31 x 10(3)/microliters (63 +/- 33 x 10(3)/microliters) using the AS-104. In the first case the platelet yield was 3.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate, in the latter case it was 2.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate. The 'CS-3000 Omnix' is significantly more effective in separating (58.4 +/- 15.5%) than the 'AS-104' with 44.2 +/- 7.2% (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since both donor groups were comparable regarding all factors recorded--especially the cardiovascular risk factors--the separation process could be responsible for the different traumatisation of platelets.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"22 4","pages":"237-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000223131","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plateletpheresis-induced increase in platelet reactivity using different cell separators.\",\"authors\":\"F Jung, U Bläsi, H Radtke, C Mrowietz, G Pindur, H Kiesewetter, E Wenzel\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000223131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since plateletpheresis is being used increasingly, it is important to regard quality control to check health risks for donors and to exclude these.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Controlled randomised prospective open comparative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Transfusion Medicine of a University Clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>112 platelet donors were examined.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Prior to and after plateletpheresis platelet reactivity was determined. The platelet concentrates in the two groups of 56 donors each were produced using either the cell separator 'CS-3000' and the collecting chamber PLT 30TM with the Omnix system (group I) or the cell separator 'AS-104' (group II).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group I five donors showed a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.1297) after plateletpheresis. In group II there were 10 donors with a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.0046) after plateletpheresis. The mean concentration of platelets was reduced by separation using the CS-3000 Omnix from 238 +/- 49 x 10(3)/microliters to 172 +/- 32 x 10(3)/microliters (68 +/- 27 x 10(3)/microliters) and from 243 +/- 53 x 10(3)/microliters to 180 +/- 31 x 10(3)/microliters (63 +/- 33 x 10(3)/microliters) using the AS-104. In the first case the platelet yield was 3.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate, in the latter case it was 2.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate. The 'CS-3000 Omnix' is significantly more effective in separating (58.4 +/- 15.5%) than the 'AS-104' with 44.2 +/- 7.2% (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Since both donor groups were comparable regarding all factors recorded--especially the cardiovascular risk factors--the separation process could be responsible for the different traumatisation of platelets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"237-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000223131\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000223131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000223131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plateletpheresis-induced increase in platelet reactivity using different cell separators.
Objective: Since plateletpheresis is being used increasingly, it is important to regard quality control to check health risks for donors and to exclude these.
Design: Controlled randomised prospective open comparative study.
Setting: Department of Transfusion Medicine of a University Clinic.
Participants: 112 platelet donors were examined.
Interventions: Prior to and after plateletpheresis platelet reactivity was determined. The platelet concentrates in the two groups of 56 donors each were produced using either the cell separator 'CS-3000' and the collecting chamber PLT 30TM with the Omnix system (group I) or the cell separator 'AS-104' (group II).
Results: In group I five donors showed a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.1297) after plateletpheresis. In group II there were 10 donors with a pathologically increased platelet reactivity (p = 0.0046) after plateletpheresis. The mean concentration of platelets was reduced by separation using the CS-3000 Omnix from 238 +/- 49 x 10(3)/microliters to 172 +/- 32 x 10(3)/microliters (68 +/- 27 x 10(3)/microliters) and from 243 +/- 53 x 10(3)/microliters to 180 +/- 31 x 10(3)/microliters (63 +/- 33 x 10(3)/microliters) using the AS-104. In the first case the platelet yield was 3.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate, in the latter case it was 2.9 x 10(11) platelets/concentrate. The 'CS-3000 Omnix' is significantly more effective in separating (58.4 +/- 15.5%) than the 'AS-104' with 44.2 +/- 7.2% (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Since both donor groups were comparable regarding all factors recorded--especially the cardiovascular risk factors--the separation process could be responsible for the different traumatisation of platelets.