[单克隆试剂在t抗原活化中抗原测定的适用性]。

E Strobel
{"title":"[单克隆试剂在t抗原活化中抗原测定的适用性]。","authors":"E Strobel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of additional antibodies--for example anti-T--which can be contained in test sera of human origin has been pointed out as an advantage of monoclonal reagents in blood group serology. It was the aim of our study to examine whether the reactions of monoclonal reagents are nevertheless disturbed by T activation of red blood cells or not.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Monoclonal reagents of several manufacturers of the specificities anti-A, -B, -AB, -A1, -H, -C, -c, -D, -E, -e, -K, -Jka, -Jkb, -Lea, -Leb, -M, and -N were tested. For this study we examined sialidase-treated and not treated red blood cells with and without the tested blood group antigen by the reagent using the tube centrifugation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant disturbances for the monoclonal reagents of the AB0-system, A subgroups, Rhesus system, Kidd system, Kell antigen, and Leb antigen. Monoclonal anti-M and anti-N showed missing reactivity with sialidase-treated erythrocytes, which is already known from polyclonal test sera. Most of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents showed strong false-positive reactions with T-positive Le(a-) erythrocytes. After several absorptions of one of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents with T-activated Le(a-b-) red blood cells, the reactivity of the reagent with the Lea antigen and the T antigen had disappeared.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to the other monoclonal reagents for most of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents the lack of additional anti-T antibodies does not indicate the lack of false-positive reactions. This cross-reactivity might be caused by the fact that the type 1 chain antigen Lea and the type 3 chain antigen T have the same terminal saccharide (galactose) in beta 1-->3 connection to the preterminal saccharide of their peripheral core structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13632,"journal":{"name":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","volume":"22 4","pages":"249-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Suitability of monoclonal reagents for antigen determination in T-antigen activation].\",\"authors\":\"E Strobel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of additional antibodies--for example anti-T--which can be contained in test sera of human origin has been pointed out as an advantage of monoclonal reagents in blood group serology. It was the aim of our study to examine whether the reactions of monoclonal reagents are nevertheless disturbed by T activation of red blood cells or not.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Monoclonal reagents of several manufacturers of the specificities anti-A, -B, -AB, -A1, -H, -C, -c, -D, -E, -e, -K, -Jka, -Jkb, -Lea, -Leb, -M, and -N were tested. For this study we examined sialidase-treated and not treated red blood cells with and without the tested blood group antigen by the reagent using the tube centrifugation method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant disturbances for the monoclonal reagents of the AB0-system, A subgroups, Rhesus system, Kidd system, Kell antigen, and Leb antigen. Monoclonal anti-M and anti-N showed missing reactivity with sialidase-treated erythrocytes, which is already known from polyclonal test sera. Most of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents showed strong false-positive reactions with T-positive Le(a-) erythrocytes. After several absorptions of one of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents with T-activated Le(a-b-) red blood cells, the reactivity of the reagent with the Lea antigen and the T antigen had disappeared.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to the other monoclonal reagents for most of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents the lack of additional anti-T antibodies does not indicate the lack of false-positive reactions. This cross-reactivity might be caused by the fact that the type 1 chain antigen Lea and the type 3 chain antigen T have the same terminal saccharide (galactose) in beta 1-->3 connection to the preterminal saccharide of their peripheral core structure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"249-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infusionstherapie und Transfusionsmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺乏额外的抗体,如抗t抗体,可包含在测试血清的人已被指出是单克隆试剂在血型血清学的优势。我们研究的目的是检验单克隆试剂的反应是否会受到红细胞T活化的干扰。材料与方法:检测多家厂家抗- a、-B、-AB、-A1、-H、-C、-C、-D、-E、-E、-K、-Jka、-Jkb、-Lea、-Leb、-M、-N特异性的单克隆试剂。在本研究中,我们用试管离心的方法检测了唾液酸酶处理和未处理的红细胞,这些红细胞有和没有被检测的血型抗原。结果:我们发现ab0系统、A亚群、Rhesus系统、Kidd系统、Kell抗原和Leb抗原的单克隆试剂没有明显的干扰。单克隆抗m和抗n对唾液酸酶处理的红细胞缺乏反应性,这已经从多克隆试验血清中得知。大多数单克隆抗lea试剂对t阳性Le(a-)红细胞表现出强假阳性反应。其中一种单克隆抗Lea试剂经T活化的Le(a-b-)红细胞多次吸收后,该试剂与Lea抗原和T抗原的反应性消失。结论:与其他单克隆试剂相比,大多数单克隆抗lea试剂缺乏额外的抗t抗体并不表明没有假阳性反应。这种交叉反应性可能是由于1型链抗原Lea和3型链抗原T在其外周核心结构的β 1- >3连接中具有相同的末端糖(半乳糖)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Suitability of monoclonal reagents for antigen determination in T-antigen activation].

Background: The lack of additional antibodies--for example anti-T--which can be contained in test sera of human origin has been pointed out as an advantage of monoclonal reagents in blood group serology. It was the aim of our study to examine whether the reactions of monoclonal reagents are nevertheless disturbed by T activation of red blood cells or not.

Materials and methods: Monoclonal reagents of several manufacturers of the specificities anti-A, -B, -AB, -A1, -H, -C, -c, -D, -E, -e, -K, -Jka, -Jkb, -Lea, -Leb, -M, and -N were tested. For this study we examined sialidase-treated and not treated red blood cells with and without the tested blood group antigen by the reagent using the tube centrifugation method.

Results: We found no significant disturbances for the monoclonal reagents of the AB0-system, A subgroups, Rhesus system, Kidd system, Kell antigen, and Leb antigen. Monoclonal anti-M and anti-N showed missing reactivity with sialidase-treated erythrocytes, which is already known from polyclonal test sera. Most of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents showed strong false-positive reactions with T-positive Le(a-) erythrocytes. After several absorptions of one of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents with T-activated Le(a-b-) red blood cells, the reactivity of the reagent with the Lea antigen and the T antigen had disappeared.

Conclusions: In contrast to the other monoclonal reagents for most of the monoclonal anti-Lea reagents the lack of additional anti-T antibodies does not indicate the lack of false-positive reactions. This cross-reactivity might be caused by the fact that the type 1 chain antigen Lea and the type 3 chain antigen T have the same terminal saccharide (galactose) in beta 1-->3 connection to the preterminal saccharide of their peripheral core structure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信