{"title":"后放电阈值测定方法的差异:对实验设计的启示。","authors":"H S Swartzwelder, D A Mobray","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hippocampal afterdischarge (AD) thresholds were determined twice using different threshold determination methods. Fourty-five days later thresholds were redetermined using each of the methods. Method A [3] produced higher AD thresholds which were less stable over time than were those produced using method B [4]. In addition, threshold level ADs produced using method A were of longer duration in the second phase of the experiment than in the first. No such changes were seen over time in the durations of method B ADs.</p>","PeriodicalId":76207,"journal":{"name":"Neurobehavioral toxicology","volume":"2 1","pages":"59-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in afterdischarge threshold determination methods: implications for experimental designs.\",\"authors\":\"H S Swartzwelder, D A Mobray\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hippocampal afterdischarge (AD) thresholds were determined twice using different threshold determination methods. Fourty-five days later thresholds were redetermined using each of the methods. Method A [3] produced higher AD thresholds which were less stable over time than were those produced using method B [4]. In addition, threshold level ADs produced using method A were of longer duration in the second phase of the experiment than in the first. No such changes were seen over time in the durations of method B ADs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurobehavioral toxicology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"59-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurobehavioral toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobehavioral toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in afterdischarge threshold determination methods: implications for experimental designs.
Hippocampal afterdischarge (AD) thresholds were determined twice using different threshold determination methods. Fourty-five days later thresholds were redetermined using each of the methods. Method A [3] produced higher AD thresholds which were less stable over time than were those produced using method B [4]. In addition, threshold level ADs produced using method A were of longer duration in the second phase of the experiment than in the first. No such changes were seen over time in the durations of method B ADs.