{"title":"【整形外科摄影纪实问题】。","authors":"J Schrudde, W Niermann, I Goldberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A basic aim of photographic documentation of clinical cases is to compare these cases with each other. Some examples illustrate possible misinterpretations due to inadequate or variable photographic conditions. To assess postoperative results is possible only in exact comparative photography. Depending upon specific problems, the required conditions are variable. Nevertheless, some general rules can be formulated. They should be applied in a photographic documentation of clinical cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":76857,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur plastische Chirurgie","volume":"5 4","pages":"198-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Problems of photographic documentation in plastic surgery].\",\"authors\":\"J Schrudde, W Niermann, I Goldberg\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A basic aim of photographic documentation of clinical cases is to compare these cases with each other. Some examples illustrate possible misinterpretations due to inadequate or variable photographic conditions. To assess postoperative results is possible only in exact comparative photography. Depending upon specific problems, the required conditions are variable. Nevertheless, some general rules can be formulated. They should be applied in a photographic documentation of clinical cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur plastische Chirurgie\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"198-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur plastische Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur plastische Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Problems of photographic documentation in plastic surgery].
A basic aim of photographic documentation of clinical cases is to compare these cases with each other. Some examples illustrate possible misinterpretations due to inadequate or variable photographic conditions. To assess postoperative results is possible only in exact comparative photography. Depending upon specific problems, the required conditions are variable. Nevertheless, some general rules can be formulated. They should be applied in a photographic documentation of clinical cases.