Mohamed M. Ghoneim , Steven P. Mewaldt , Ronald C. Petersen
{"title":"亚麻醉浓度的氧化亚氮和人的记忆","authors":"Mohamed M. Ghoneim , Steven P. Mewaldt , Ronald C. Petersen","doi":"10.1016/0364-7722(81)90091-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>1. Subanesthetic concentrations of nitrous oxide are used for analgesia and are occasionally abused. The effects of 30% nitrous oxide on human learning and memory, facility for solving mathematical problems and subjective feelings were investigated.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>2. There were 40 normal volunteers; two drugs; 30% nitrous oxide in oxygen (N) and 100% oxygen (P, placebo); and two experimental sessions. Subjects were divided into four groups according to the drug which they inhaled in the two sessions: PP, PN, NP and NN.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>3. “N” produced a marked decrease in learning; mean number of words recalled was 22.9 vs. 50.2 for “P” (P < .001).</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>4. On the digit span test, the percent correct under “N” was 63.0 vs. 76.8 under “P” (p< .01), indicating an impairment of short-term memory. “N” also reduced the number of mathematical problems attempted; mean number was 39.0 vs. 52.8 for “P” (p < .002) and reduced the accuracy: 75.5% for “N” vs. 94.8% for “P” (p < .001).</p></span></li><li><span>5.</span><span><p>5. Computation of the difference scores between the number of words learned in Session I and the number recalled in Session II indicated impairment of retrieval under “N”. There was no evidence of state-dependent learning.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":20801,"journal":{"name":"Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0364-7722(81)90091-6","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subanesthetic concentration of nitrous oxide and human memory\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed M. Ghoneim , Steven P. Mewaldt , Ronald C. Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0364-7722(81)90091-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>1.</span><span><p>1. Subanesthetic concentrations of nitrous oxide are used for analgesia and are occasionally abused. The effects of 30% nitrous oxide on human learning and memory, facility for solving mathematical problems and subjective feelings were investigated.</p></span></li><li><span>2.</span><span><p>2. There were 40 normal volunteers; two drugs; 30% nitrous oxide in oxygen (N) and 100% oxygen (P, placebo); and two experimental sessions. Subjects were divided into four groups according to the drug which they inhaled in the two sessions: PP, PN, NP and NN.</p></span></li><li><span>3.</span><span><p>3. “N” produced a marked decrease in learning; mean number of words recalled was 22.9 vs. 50.2 for “P” (P < .001).</p></span></li><li><span>4.</span><span><p>4. On the digit span test, the percent correct under “N” was 63.0 vs. 76.8 under “P” (p< .01), indicating an impairment of short-term memory. “N” also reduced the number of mathematical problems attempted; mean number was 39.0 vs. 52.8 for “P” (p < .002) and reduced the accuracy: 75.5% for “N” vs. 94.8% for “P” (p < .001).</p></span></li><li><span>5.</span><span><p>5. Computation of the difference scores between the number of words learned in Session I and the number recalled in Session II indicated impairment of retrieval under “N”. There was no evidence of state-dependent learning.</p></span></li></ul></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0364-7722(81)90091-6\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0364772281900916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0364772281900916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subanesthetic concentration of nitrous oxide and human memory
1.
1. Subanesthetic concentrations of nitrous oxide are used for analgesia and are occasionally abused. The effects of 30% nitrous oxide on human learning and memory, facility for solving mathematical problems and subjective feelings were investigated.
2.
2. There were 40 normal volunteers; two drugs; 30% nitrous oxide in oxygen (N) and 100% oxygen (P, placebo); and two experimental sessions. Subjects were divided into four groups according to the drug which they inhaled in the two sessions: PP, PN, NP and NN.
3.
3. “N” produced a marked decrease in learning; mean number of words recalled was 22.9 vs. 50.2 for “P” (P < .001).
4.
4. On the digit span test, the percent correct under “N” was 63.0 vs. 76.8 under “P” (p< .01), indicating an impairment of short-term memory. “N” also reduced the number of mathematical problems attempted; mean number was 39.0 vs. 52.8 for “P” (p < .002) and reduced the accuracy: 75.5% for “N” vs. 94.8% for “P” (p < .001).
5.
5. Computation of the difference scores between the number of words learned in Session I and the number recalled in Session II indicated impairment of retrieval under “N”. There was no evidence of state-dependent learning.