一种衡量和评价健康状况的方法

Harri Sintonen
{"title":"一种衡量和评价健康状况的方法","authors":"Harri Sintonen","doi":"10.1016/0160-7995(81)90019-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An approach to measuring health with respect to a set of 12 dimensions representing perceived health, physiological and social functioning is suggested. Each dimension is divided into four or five discrete levels. Health states are defined as mutually exclusive combinations of the levels on the dimensions. This classification of health states is disease-independent, quite sensitive and valid in the sense that it reflects the concept of health underlying Finnish health policy, but is likely to be of equal relevance in other societies.</p><p>In an experiment to elicit empirical values for health states, a non-random sample of the general public, consisting of hospital patients and ‘healthy’ non-health professionals was used. Based on self-administered questionnaires, two scaling techniques, a magnitude method and a category method, were applied. For each subject the type of questionnaire was determined randomly.</p><p>When judged in the light of the understandability of the questions involved and difficulty in answering them, there was no significant difference in the feasibility between the methods. As to the values the methods produced closely comparable and relatively reliable results. The first experiences gained from the approach suggest that it is a viable one and worth testing and developing further.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":76948,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Medical economics","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 55-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7995(81)90019-8","citationCount":"104","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An approach to measuring and valuing health states\",\"authors\":\"Harri Sintonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0160-7995(81)90019-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An approach to measuring health with respect to a set of 12 dimensions representing perceived health, physiological and social functioning is suggested. Each dimension is divided into four or five discrete levels. Health states are defined as mutually exclusive combinations of the levels on the dimensions. This classification of health states is disease-independent, quite sensitive and valid in the sense that it reflects the concept of health underlying Finnish health policy, but is likely to be of equal relevance in other societies.</p><p>In an experiment to elicit empirical values for health states, a non-random sample of the general public, consisting of hospital patients and ‘healthy’ non-health professionals was used. Based on self-administered questionnaires, two scaling techniques, a magnitude method and a category method, were applied. For each subject the type of questionnaire was determined randomly.</p><p>When judged in the light of the understandability of the questions involved and difficulty in answering them, there was no significant difference in the feasibility between the methods. As to the values the methods produced closely comparable and relatively reliable results. The first experiences gained from the approach suggest that it is a viable one and worth testing and developing further.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Medical economics\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 55-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-7995(81)90019-8\",\"citationCount\":\"104\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Medical economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160799581900198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Medical economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160799581900198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 104

摘要

提出了一种衡量健康的方法,涉及代表感知健康、生理和社会功能的一套12个维度。每个维度被分成四或五个离散的层次。运行状况状态定义为维度上各级别的互斥组合。这种健康状况分类与疾病无关,相当敏感和有效,因为它反映了芬兰卫生政策所依据的健康概念,但在其他社会中可能同样具有相关性。在一项得出健康状态经验值的实验中,使用了由医院病人和“健康”的非卫生专业人员组成的非随机公众样本。基于自填问卷,采用量值法和类别法两种量表技术。对于每个受试者,问卷的类型是随机确定的。当根据所涉及问题的可理解性和回答这些问题的难度来判断时,两种方法之间的可行性没有显着差异。在数值方面,两种方法得出的结果具有密切的可比性和相对的可靠性。从该方法获得的初步经验表明,它是一种可行的方法,值得进一步测试和开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An approach to measuring and valuing health states

An approach to measuring health with respect to a set of 12 dimensions representing perceived health, physiological and social functioning is suggested. Each dimension is divided into four or five discrete levels. Health states are defined as mutually exclusive combinations of the levels on the dimensions. This classification of health states is disease-independent, quite sensitive and valid in the sense that it reflects the concept of health underlying Finnish health policy, but is likely to be of equal relevance in other societies.

In an experiment to elicit empirical values for health states, a non-random sample of the general public, consisting of hospital patients and ‘healthy’ non-health professionals was used. Based on self-administered questionnaires, two scaling techniques, a magnitude method and a category method, were applied. For each subject the type of questionnaire was determined randomly.

When judged in the light of the understandability of the questions involved and difficulty in answering them, there was no significant difference in the feasibility between the methods. As to the values the methods produced closely comparable and relatively reliable results. The first experiences gained from the approach suggest that it is a viable one and worth testing and developing further.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信