Youngwoo Yun , Teawoo Kim , Saebom Hwang , Hyunmin Oh , Yeongju Kim , Hoonyoung Jeong , Sungil Kim
{"title":"利用机器学习预测气井的液体涌动体积和流速","authors":"Youngwoo Yun , Teawoo Kim , Saebom Hwang , Hyunmin Oh , Yeongju Kim , Hoonyoung Jeong , Sungil Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Liquid surge refers to an excessive liquid inflow to a slug catcher or a separator and is one of the main issues in flow assurance. The wellhead choke valves of gas wells must be adjusted to maintain the target flow rate as the reservoir pressure drops. The wellhead choke opening can be determined by conducting multiphase pipeline transient flow simulations to achieve the target flow rate and avoid liquid surges. However, it is not financially and computationally practical to conduct many multiphase transient pipeline flow simulations simultaneously for hundreds of wells. We found that flow rates and maximum liquid surge volumes for gas wells can be predicted accurately using simple machine learning models when the wellhead choke valve is adjusted. The machine learning models provided accurate predictions (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.99) regarding flow rates and maximum liquid surge volumes for different wellhead pressure drop plans, vertical and horizontal well lengths, and current operating conditions in cases involving two real fields, the Horn River Basin (HRB) and Rakhine Basin field. The wellhead operating conditions that are appropriate for achieving the target flow rate and avoiding liquid surges can be efficiently determined using the machine learning models instead of multiphase transient pipeline flow simulators. The proposed approach also accurately estimated downhole pressures that are necessary to evaluate reservoir performances given wellhead pressures and flow rates. Lastly, we presented what features are dominant in predicting liquid surge volumes, flow rates, and downhole pressures in feature importance analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 104802"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of liquid surge volumes and flow rates for gas wells using machine learning\",\"authors\":\"Youngwoo Yun , Teawoo Kim , Saebom Hwang , Hyunmin Oh , Yeongju Kim , Hoonyoung Jeong , Sungil Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104802\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Liquid surge refers to an excessive liquid inflow to a slug catcher or a separator and is one of the main issues in flow assurance. The wellhead choke valves of gas wells must be adjusted to maintain the target flow rate as the reservoir pressure drops. The wellhead choke opening can be determined by conducting multiphase pipeline transient flow simulations to achieve the target flow rate and avoid liquid surges. However, it is not financially and computationally practical to conduct many multiphase transient pipeline flow simulations simultaneously for hundreds of wells. We found that flow rates and maximum liquid surge volumes for gas wells can be predicted accurately using simple machine learning models when the wellhead choke valve is adjusted. The machine learning models provided accurate predictions (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.99) regarding flow rates and maximum liquid surge volumes for different wellhead pressure drop plans, vertical and horizontal well lengths, and current operating conditions in cases involving two real fields, the Horn River Basin (HRB) and Rakhine Basin field. The wellhead operating conditions that are appropriate for achieving the target flow rate and avoiding liquid surges can be efficiently determined using the machine learning models instead of multiphase transient pipeline flow simulators. The proposed approach also accurately estimated downhole pressures that are necessary to evaluate reservoir performances given wellhead pressures and flow rates. Lastly, we presented what features are dominant in predicting liquid surge volumes, flow rates, and downhole pressures in feature importance analyses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003882\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
液体喘振是指过量的液体流入段塞流捕集器或分离器,是流动保障的主要问题之一。当储层压力下降时,必须调整气井的井口节流阀以保持目标流量。通过多相管道瞬态流动模拟,确定井口节流口开度,达到目标流量,避免液体涌动。然而,同时对数百口井进行多相瞬态管道流动模拟在经济上和计算上都不可行。我们发现,当调整井口节流阀时,可以使用简单的机器学习模型准确预测气井的流量和最大液体涌动体积。机器学习模型提供了准确的预测(R2 >在涉及两个实际油田(Horn River Basin (HRB)和Rakhine Basin油田)的情况下,对不同井口压降方案下的流量和最大液体涌量、直井和水平井长度以及当前操作条件进行了0.99)。使用机器学习模型而不是多相瞬态管道流动模拟器,可以有效地确定适合实现目标流速和避免液体涌动的井口操作条件。在给定井口压力和流量的情况下,该方法还能准确地估算出评估储层性能所需的井下压力。最后,我们介绍了在特征重要性分析中,哪些特征在预测液体涌动体积、流速和井下压力方面占主导地位。
Prediction of liquid surge volumes and flow rates for gas wells using machine learning
Liquid surge refers to an excessive liquid inflow to a slug catcher or a separator and is one of the main issues in flow assurance. The wellhead choke valves of gas wells must be adjusted to maintain the target flow rate as the reservoir pressure drops. The wellhead choke opening can be determined by conducting multiphase pipeline transient flow simulations to achieve the target flow rate and avoid liquid surges. However, it is not financially and computationally practical to conduct many multiphase transient pipeline flow simulations simultaneously for hundreds of wells. We found that flow rates and maximum liquid surge volumes for gas wells can be predicted accurately using simple machine learning models when the wellhead choke valve is adjusted. The machine learning models provided accurate predictions (R2 > 0.99) regarding flow rates and maximum liquid surge volumes for different wellhead pressure drop plans, vertical and horizontal well lengths, and current operating conditions in cases involving two real fields, the Horn River Basin (HRB) and Rakhine Basin field. The wellhead operating conditions that are appropriate for achieving the target flow rate and avoiding liquid surges can be efficiently determined using the machine learning models instead of multiphase transient pipeline flow simulators. The proposed approach also accurately estimated downhole pressures that are necessary to evaluate reservoir performances given wellhead pressures and flow rates. Lastly, we presented what features are dominant in predicting liquid surge volumes, flow rates, and downhole pressures in feature importance analyses.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.