不可逃避性休克引起的长期镇痛解离和梭盒逃逸缺陷。

A J MacLennan, R C Drugan, R L Hyson, S F Maier, J Madden, J D Barchas
{"title":"不可逃避性休克引起的长期镇痛解离和梭盒逃逸缺陷。","authors":"A J MacLennan,&nbsp;R C Drugan,&nbsp;R L Hyson,&nbsp;S F Maier,&nbsp;J Madden,&nbsp;J D Barchas","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inescapably shocked rats perform poorly on a two-way shuttle box escape task 24 hr after the shock. Because inescapably shocked rats become analgesic upon reexposure to a small amount of shock 24 hr after inescapable shock, they are likely to be analgesic during the shuttle box escape task. Subjects receiving an equivalent amount of escapable shock display neither the escape dificit nor the analgesia. Both the analgesia and the escape deficit respond in a similar fashion to the manipulation of a variety of other variables. These findings have led to the suggestion that the analgesia (\"long-term analgesia\") may cause the inescapable-shock-produced escape deficit. However, the present experiments demonstrated that two pituitary manipulations that completely eliminate the analgesia have no effect on the escape deficit. Both hypophysectomy and dexamethasone administration blocked the analgesic consequences of inescapable shock but did not reduce the magnitude of the escape deficit. Therefore, the long-term analgesia produced by inescapable shock does not cause the deficit in shuttle box escape performance displayed by inescapably shocked rats. Furthermore, these results indicate that the pituitary is not essential in the production of this escape deficit.</p>","PeriodicalId":15394,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissociation of long-term analgesia and the shuttle box escape deficit caused by inescapable shock.\",\"authors\":\"A J MacLennan,&nbsp;R C Drugan,&nbsp;R L Hyson,&nbsp;S F Maier,&nbsp;J Madden,&nbsp;J D Barchas\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inescapably shocked rats perform poorly on a two-way shuttle box escape task 24 hr after the shock. Because inescapably shocked rats become analgesic upon reexposure to a small amount of shock 24 hr after inescapable shock, they are likely to be analgesic during the shuttle box escape task. Subjects receiving an equivalent amount of escapable shock display neither the escape dificit nor the analgesia. Both the analgesia and the escape deficit respond in a similar fashion to the manipulation of a variety of other variables. These findings have led to the suggestion that the analgesia (\\\"long-term analgesia\\\") may cause the inescapable-shock-produced escape deficit. However, the present experiments demonstrated that two pituitary manipulations that completely eliminate the analgesia have no effect on the escape deficit. Both hypophysectomy and dexamethasone administration blocked the analgesic consequences of inescapable shock but did not reduce the magnitude of the escape deficit. Therefore, the long-term analgesia produced by inescapable shock does not cause the deficit in shuttle box escape performance displayed by inescapably shocked rats. Furthermore, these results indicate that the pituitary is not essential in the production of this escape deficit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative and physiological psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不可避免受到电击的大鼠在电击24小时后的双向穿梭箱逃脱任务中表现不佳。由于不可避免性电击大鼠在不可避免性电击24小时后再次暴露于少量电击后会产生镇痛作用,因此它们在穿梭箱逃脱任务中可能会产生镇痛作用。接受等量可逃避性电击的受试者既没有表现出逃避困难,也没有表现出镇痛。镇痛和逃避缺陷都以类似的方式对各种其他变量的操纵作出反应。这些发现表明,镇痛(“长期镇痛”)可能导致不可避免的休克产生的逃避缺陷。然而,目前的实验表明,两种完全消除镇痛的垂体操作对逃避赤字没有影响。垂体切除术和地塞米松均可阻断不可避免的休克的镇痛后果,但不能减少休克的程度。由此可见,不可逃避性电击所产生的长期镇痛并不会导致不可逃避性电击大鼠梭箱逃脱表现的缺陷。此外,这些结果表明垂体在这种逃逸缺陷的产生中不是必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissociation of long-term analgesia and the shuttle box escape deficit caused by inescapable shock.

Inescapably shocked rats perform poorly on a two-way shuttle box escape task 24 hr after the shock. Because inescapably shocked rats become analgesic upon reexposure to a small amount of shock 24 hr after inescapable shock, they are likely to be analgesic during the shuttle box escape task. Subjects receiving an equivalent amount of escapable shock display neither the escape dificit nor the analgesia. Both the analgesia and the escape deficit respond in a similar fashion to the manipulation of a variety of other variables. These findings have led to the suggestion that the analgesia ("long-term analgesia") may cause the inescapable-shock-produced escape deficit. However, the present experiments demonstrated that two pituitary manipulations that completely eliminate the analgesia have no effect on the escape deficit. Both hypophysectomy and dexamethasone administration blocked the analgesic consequences of inescapable shock but did not reduce the magnitude of the escape deficit. Therefore, the long-term analgesia produced by inescapable shock does not cause the deficit in shuttle box escape performance displayed by inescapably shocked rats. Furthermore, these results indicate that the pituitary is not essential in the production of this escape deficit.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信