{"title":"CH4和CO2水合物诱导期差异的实验表征:对替代过程的动机和可能后果","authors":"Alberto Maria Gambelli, Federico Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The present research explores the differences in induction time between methane and carbon dioxide hydrates. This parameter was calculated by considering the heat released during the formation of hydrates. Being the process exothermic, the heat released, in conjunction with the enthalpy of formation, allowed to calculate the quantity of hydrates formed as soon as the process became detectable. This information was then combined with the measure of time to define the induction period. The procedure was selected in order to avoid possible errors related to the dissolution of carbon dioxide in water, which may affect the accuracy of detection. It was found that the induction time is significantly longer for carbon dioxide hydrates. It can be explained with the non-hydrophobicity of the molecule and with the higher Gibbs free energy barrier which must be overcome to produce the first nuclei of CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> hydrates. The reliability of the proposed method was verified by evaluating the gas absorption over time for methane, whose dissolution in water can be considered negligible. Finally, it was proved that, after the formation of the first conglomerates, the growth of carbon dioxide hydrates is faster than that of methane hydrates, due to the higher degree of mixing between water and gas molecules within the whole formation environment.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 104848"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental characterization of the difference in induction period between CH4 and CO2 hydrates: Motivations and possible consequences on the replacement process\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Maria Gambelli, Federico Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The present research explores the differences in induction time between methane and carbon dioxide hydrates. This parameter was calculated by considering the heat released during the formation of hydrates. Being the process exothermic, the heat released, in conjunction with the enthalpy of formation, allowed to calculate the quantity of hydrates formed as soon as the process became detectable. This information was then combined with the measure of time to define the induction period. The procedure was selected in order to avoid possible errors related to the dissolution of carbon dioxide in water, which may affect the accuracy of detection. It was found that the induction time is significantly longer for carbon dioxide hydrates. It can be explained with the non-hydrophobicity of the molecule and with the higher Gibbs free energy barrier which must be overcome to produce the first nuclei of CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> hydrates. The reliability of the proposed method was verified by evaluating the gas absorption over time for methane, whose dissolution in water can be considered negligible. Finally, it was proved that, after the formation of the first conglomerates, the growth of carbon dioxide hydrates is faster than that of methane hydrates, due to the higher degree of mixing between water and gas molecules within the whole formation environment.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"108 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004346\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022004346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental characterization of the difference in induction period between CH4 and CO2 hydrates: Motivations and possible consequences on the replacement process
The present research explores the differences in induction time between methane and carbon dioxide hydrates. This parameter was calculated by considering the heat released during the formation of hydrates. Being the process exothermic, the heat released, in conjunction with the enthalpy of formation, allowed to calculate the quantity of hydrates formed as soon as the process became detectable. This information was then combined with the measure of time to define the induction period. The procedure was selected in order to avoid possible errors related to the dissolution of carbon dioxide in water, which may affect the accuracy of detection. It was found that the induction time is significantly longer for carbon dioxide hydrates. It can be explained with the non-hydrophobicity of the molecule and with the higher Gibbs free energy barrier which must be overcome to produce the first nuclei of CO2 hydrates. The reliability of the proposed method was verified by evaluating the gas absorption over time for methane, whose dissolution in water can be considered negligible. Finally, it was proved that, after the formation of the first conglomerates, the growth of carbon dioxide hydrates is faster than that of methane hydrates, due to the higher degree of mixing between water and gas molecules within the whole formation environment.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.