晚期复发何杰金氏病的MER免疫治疗和联合化疗。癌症和白血病B组研究。

Cancer clinical trials Pub Date : 1981-01-01
V Vinciguerra, M Coleman, T F Pajak, S Rafla, L Stutzman, G Gomez, M Weil, K Brunner, J Cuttner, N Nissen, B Leventhal, A Gottlieb
{"title":"晚期复发何杰金氏病的MER免疫治疗和联合化疗。癌症和白血病B组研究。","authors":"V Vinciguerra,&nbsp;M Coleman,&nbsp;T F Pajak,&nbsp;S Rafla,&nbsp;L Stutzman,&nbsp;G Gomez,&nbsp;M Weil,&nbsp;K Brunner,&nbsp;J Cuttner,&nbsp;N Nissen,&nbsp;B Leventhal,&nbsp;A Gottlieb","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in previously treated advanced Hodgkin's disease were evaluated in a randomized study of 167 patients by CALGB. Combination chemotherapy consisted of treatment with one of three regimens with further randomization of MER (methanol extraction residue BCG) immunotherapy or no MER during chemotherapy. CVPP (CCNU, vinblastine, procarbazine, prednisone) was compared to a new combination, BAVS (bleomycin, Adriamycin, vincristine, streptozotocin), and to a third regimen consisting of alternating cycles of CVPP and BAVS. At the current analysis there is no significant difference in complete responses among the chemotherapy regimens. MER did not improve complete response frequency and was associated with significantly poorer survival for patients previously treated with chemotherapy. There was also no benefit with MER for patients with at least one pretreatment positive skin test. Because of the documented lack of therapeutic benefit and the morbidity of painful ulcers, MER treatment has been discontinued.</p>","PeriodicalId":75672,"journal":{"name":"Cancer clinical trials","volume":"4 2","pages":"99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MER immunotherapy and combination chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent Hodgkin's disease. Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.\",\"authors\":\"V Vinciguerra,&nbsp;M Coleman,&nbsp;T F Pajak,&nbsp;S Rafla,&nbsp;L Stutzman,&nbsp;G Gomez,&nbsp;M Weil,&nbsp;K Brunner,&nbsp;J Cuttner,&nbsp;N Nissen,&nbsp;B Leventhal,&nbsp;A Gottlieb\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effects of chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in previously treated advanced Hodgkin's disease were evaluated in a randomized study of 167 patients by CALGB. Combination chemotherapy consisted of treatment with one of three regimens with further randomization of MER (methanol extraction residue BCG) immunotherapy or no MER during chemotherapy. CVPP (CCNU, vinblastine, procarbazine, prednisone) was compared to a new combination, BAVS (bleomycin, Adriamycin, vincristine, streptozotocin), and to a third regimen consisting of alternating cycles of CVPP and BAVS. At the current analysis there is no significant difference in complete responses among the chemotherapy regimens. MER did not improve complete response frequency and was associated with significantly poorer survival for patients previously treated with chemotherapy. There was also no benefit with MER for patients with at least one pretreatment positive skin test. Because of the documented lack of therapeutic benefit and the morbidity of painful ulcers, MER treatment has been discontinued.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer clinical trials\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"99-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一项167例患者的随机研究中,CALGB评估了化疗和化疗免疫治疗对先前治疗过的晚期霍奇金病的影响。联合化疗包括三种方案中的一种治疗,化疗期间进一步随机分配MER(甲醇提取残留物卡介苗)免疫治疗或不使用MER。将CVPP (CCNU、长春花碱、丙卡嗪、强的松)与一种新的组合BAVS(博来霉素、阿霉素、长春新碱、链脲佐菌素)以及由CVPP和BAVS交替周期组成的第三种方案进行比较。在目前的分析中,不同化疗方案在完全缓解方面没有显著差异。MER并没有提高完全缓解频率,并且与先前接受过化疗的患者的生存率显著降低相关。对于至少有一次预处理皮肤试验阳性的患者,使用MER也没有益处。由于文献记载缺乏治疗益处和疼痛性溃疡的发病率,MER治疗已停止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MER immunotherapy and combination chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent Hodgkin's disease. Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

The effects of chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in previously treated advanced Hodgkin's disease were evaluated in a randomized study of 167 patients by CALGB. Combination chemotherapy consisted of treatment with one of three regimens with further randomization of MER (methanol extraction residue BCG) immunotherapy or no MER during chemotherapy. CVPP (CCNU, vinblastine, procarbazine, prednisone) was compared to a new combination, BAVS (bleomycin, Adriamycin, vincristine, streptozotocin), and to a third regimen consisting of alternating cycles of CVPP and BAVS. At the current analysis there is no significant difference in complete responses among the chemotherapy regimens. MER did not improve complete response frequency and was associated with significantly poorer survival for patients previously treated with chemotherapy. There was also no benefit with MER for patients with at least one pretreatment positive skin test. Because of the documented lack of therapeutic benefit and the morbidity of painful ulcers, MER treatment has been discontinued.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信