牙医对新药信息的首选来源及其对患者使用药物的态度

Bruce P. Murray
{"title":"牙医对新药信息的首选来源及其对患者使用药物的态度","authors":"Bruce P. Murray","doi":"10.1016/0271-7123(81)90022-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study, essentially a replication of an earlier study of physicians, reports an analysis of the relationship between dentists' new drug information source preferences and attitudes concerning the use of drugs by patients. Data, collected via questionnaire from 78 dentists in a Southeastern state, disclosed that <em>Physician's Desk Reference</em> was the major source used for learning about new drugs. Recommendation by colleagues was chosen as the second most preferred source. No statistical evidence was found to support either of the following hypotheses: (1) dentists preferring professional sources will be <em>less</em> likely to feel that medication advice from nondental sources is acceptable than dentists preferring commercial sources; and (2) dentists preferring professional sources will be <em>more</em> likely to express conservative attitudes about what constitutes legitimate use of drugs by patients than dentists preferring commercial sources. Evidence was found that general practitioners are less accepting of the use of mood-altering drugs than specialists. The results are compared with the previous study and possible explanations for the observed differences are presented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79260,"journal":{"name":"Social science & medicine. Part A, Medical sociology","volume":"15 6","pages":"Pages 781-788"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-7123(81)90022-5","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dentists' preferred sources of new drug information and their attitudes toward the use of drugs by patients\",\"authors\":\"Bruce P. Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0271-7123(81)90022-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study, essentially a replication of an earlier study of physicians, reports an analysis of the relationship between dentists' new drug information source preferences and attitudes concerning the use of drugs by patients. Data, collected via questionnaire from 78 dentists in a Southeastern state, disclosed that <em>Physician's Desk Reference</em> was the major source used for learning about new drugs. Recommendation by colleagues was chosen as the second most preferred source. No statistical evidence was found to support either of the following hypotheses: (1) dentists preferring professional sources will be <em>less</em> likely to feel that medication advice from nondental sources is acceptable than dentists preferring commercial sources; and (2) dentists preferring professional sources will be <em>more</em> likely to express conservative attitudes about what constitutes legitimate use of drugs by patients than dentists preferring commercial sources. Evidence was found that general practitioners are less accepting of the use of mood-altering drugs than specialists. The results are compared with the previous study and possible explanations for the observed differences are presented.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social science & medicine. Part A, Medical sociology\",\"volume\":\"15 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 781-788\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0271-7123(81)90022-5\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social science & medicine. Part A, Medical sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271712381900225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social science & medicine. Part A, Medical sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271712381900225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

这项研究基本上复制了早期对医生的研究,报告了牙医对新药信息源的偏好与患者对药物使用态度之间关系的分析。通过问卷调查从东南部一个州的78名牙医那里收集的数据显示,医生的办公桌参考是学习新药的主要来源。同事的推荐被选为第二受欢迎的来源。没有发现统计证据支持以下假设:(1)倾向于专业来源的牙医比倾向于商业来源的牙医更不容易接受来自非牙科来源的药物建议;(2)对于什么是患者合法使用药物,牙医更倾向于选择专业来源,而不是商业来源,他们更有可能表达保守的态度。有证据表明,全科医生比专科医生更不接受使用改变情绪的药物。将结果与以往的研究结果进行了比较,并对所观察到的差异提出了可能的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dentists' preferred sources of new drug information and their attitudes toward the use of drugs by patients

This study, essentially a replication of an earlier study of physicians, reports an analysis of the relationship between dentists' new drug information source preferences and attitudes concerning the use of drugs by patients. Data, collected via questionnaire from 78 dentists in a Southeastern state, disclosed that Physician's Desk Reference was the major source used for learning about new drugs. Recommendation by colleagues was chosen as the second most preferred source. No statistical evidence was found to support either of the following hypotheses: (1) dentists preferring professional sources will be less likely to feel that medication advice from nondental sources is acceptable than dentists preferring commercial sources; and (2) dentists preferring professional sources will be more likely to express conservative attitudes about what constitutes legitimate use of drugs by patients than dentists preferring commercial sources. Evidence was found that general practitioners are less accepting of the use of mood-altering drugs than specialists. The results are compared with the previous study and possible explanations for the observed differences are presented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信