(经皮脊髓索切开术。疼痛手术的实际情况[作者简介]。

Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation Pub Date : 1981-01-01
A Kuhner
{"title":"(经皮脊髓索切开术。疼痛手术的实际情况[作者简介]。","authors":"A Kuhner","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A personal experience with 138 percutaneous cordotomies is presented. The results and complications are compared to those of 49 open cordotomies at C1-C2 level. It is concluded that the percutaneous technique has better results and less complications. Nevertheless the percutaneous cordotomy is sometimes hazardous and presents some inconvenience. For this reason the author prefers in certain cases open cordotomy in a modified microsurgical technique which is described. It is outlined that in the authors opinion cordotomy should be restricted to cancer pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":7785,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation","volume":"38 7-8","pages":"357-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Percutaneous cordotomy. Actual situation in pain surgery (author's transl)].\",\"authors\":\"A Kuhner\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A personal experience with 138 percutaneous cordotomies is presented. The results and complications are compared to those of 49 open cordotomies at C1-C2 level. It is concluded that the percutaneous technique has better results and less complications. Nevertheless the percutaneous cordotomy is sometimes hazardous and presents some inconvenience. For this reason the author prefers in certain cases open cordotomy in a modified microsurgical technique which is described. It is outlined that in the authors opinion cordotomy should be restricted to cancer pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation\",\"volume\":\"38 7-8\",\"pages\":\"357-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesie, analgesie, reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了138例经皮脊髓切开术的个人经验。结果及并发症与49例C1-C2水平开放脐带切除术的结果进行比较。经皮穿刺技术效果较好,并发症少。然而,经皮脐带切开术有时是危险的,并带来一些不便。出于这个原因,作者更倾向于在某些情况下采用一种改良的显微外科技术进行开放脐带切开术。作者认为,脐带切开术应局限于癌性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Percutaneous cordotomy. Actual situation in pain surgery (author's transl)].

A personal experience with 138 percutaneous cordotomies is presented. The results and complications are compared to those of 49 open cordotomies at C1-C2 level. It is concluded that the percutaneous technique has better results and less complications. Nevertheless the percutaneous cordotomy is sometimes hazardous and presents some inconvenience. For this reason the author prefers in certain cases open cordotomy in a modified microsurgical technique which is described. It is outlined that in the authors opinion cordotomy should be restricted to cancer pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信