用LC-MS/MS评价不同人群中有机和无机枪弹残留物

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
William Feeney , Korina Menking-Hoggatt , Luis Arroyo , James Curran , Suzanne Bell , Tatiana Trejos
{"title":"用LC-MS/MS评价不同人群中有机和无机枪弹残留物","authors":"William Feeney ,&nbsp;Korina Menking-Hoggatt ,&nbsp;Luis Arroyo ,&nbsp;James Curran ,&nbsp;Suzanne Bell ,&nbsp;Tatiana Trejos","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2021.100389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work investigated the prevalence of organic and inorganic gunshot residue within two main subpopulations, 1) non-shooters, including groups with low- and high-risk of potentially containing GSR-like residues, and 2) individuals involved in a firing event (shooters, bystanders, and shooters performing post-shooting activities). The study analyzed over 400 samples via a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodology with complexing agents. Exploratory statistical tools and machine learning algorithms (neural networks, NN) were used to evaluate the resulting mass spectral and quantitative data. This study observed lower occurrences of OGSR compounds in the non-shooter populations compared to IGSR analytes. The presence of GSR on authentic shooters versus other potential sources of false positives, such as bystanders and professions including police officers, agricultural workers, and mechanics, were further assessed by utilizing machine learning algorithms trained with the observed OGSR/IGSR traces. The probability of false negatives was also estimated with groups who performed regular activities after firing. Additionally, the low-risk background set allowed documentation of GSR occurrence in the general population. The probabilistic outputs of the neural network models were utilized to calculate likelihood ratios (LR) to measure the weight of the evidence. Using both the IGSR and OGSR profiles, the NN model’s accuracy ranged from 90 to 99%, depending on the subpopulation complexity. The log-LR histograms and Tippet plots show the method can discriminate between each sub-population and low rates of misleading evidence, suggesting that the proposed approach can be effectively used for a probabilistic interpretation of GSR evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of organic and inorganic gunshot residues in various populations using LC-MS/MS\",\"authors\":\"William Feeney ,&nbsp;Korina Menking-Hoggatt ,&nbsp;Luis Arroyo ,&nbsp;James Curran ,&nbsp;Suzanne Bell ,&nbsp;Tatiana Trejos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.forc.2021.100389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This work investigated the prevalence of organic and inorganic gunshot residue within two main subpopulations, 1) non-shooters, including groups with low- and high-risk of potentially containing GSR-like residues, and 2) individuals involved in a firing event (shooters, bystanders, and shooters performing post-shooting activities). The study analyzed over 400 samples via a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodology with complexing agents. Exploratory statistical tools and machine learning algorithms (neural networks, NN) were used to evaluate the resulting mass spectral and quantitative data. This study observed lower occurrences of OGSR compounds in the non-shooter populations compared to IGSR analytes. The presence of GSR on authentic shooters versus other potential sources of false positives, such as bystanders and professions including police officers, agricultural workers, and mechanics, were further assessed by utilizing machine learning algorithms trained with the observed OGSR/IGSR traces. The probability of false negatives was also estimated with groups who performed regular activities after firing. Additionally, the low-risk background set allowed documentation of GSR occurrence in the general population. The probabilistic outputs of the neural network models were utilized to calculate likelihood ratios (LR) to measure the weight of the evidence. Using both the IGSR and OGSR profiles, the NN model’s accuracy ranged from 90 to 99%, depending on the subpopulation complexity. The log-LR histograms and Tippet plots show the method can discriminate between each sub-population and low rates of misleading evidence, suggesting that the proposed approach can be effectively used for a probabilistic interpretation of GSR evidence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forensic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170921000850\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170921000850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了有机和无机射击残留物在两个主要亚群中的流行情况,1)非射击者,包括可能含有gsr样残留物的低风险和高风险群体,以及2)参与射击事件的个人(射击者、旁观者和射击后活动的射击者)。本研究采用液相色谱-质谱法(LC-MS/MS)和络合剂对400多个样品进行了分析。探索性统计工具和机器学习算法(神经网络,NN)被用来评估得到的质谱和定量数据。本研究发现,与IGSR分析物相比,非射手群体中OGSR化合物的发生率较低。通过使用观察到的OGSR/IGSR痕迹训练的机器学习算法,进一步评估了真实射击者与其他潜在误报来源(如旁观者和专业人员,包括警察、农业工人和机械师)之间的GSR存在。在射击后进行常规活动的小组中,也估计了假阴性的概率。此外,低风险背景组允许在一般人群中记录GSR的发生。利用神经网络模型的概率输出计算似然比(LR)来衡量证据的权重。使用IGSR和OGSR剖面,神经网络模型的精度范围在90%到99%之间,这取决于子种群的复杂性。对数- lr直方图和Tippet图表明,该方法可以区分每个亚群,并且误导证据的率很低,这表明该方法可以有效地用于GSR证据的概率解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of organic and inorganic gunshot residues in various populations using LC-MS/MS

Evaluation of organic and inorganic gunshot residues in various populations using LC-MS/MS

This work investigated the prevalence of organic and inorganic gunshot residue within two main subpopulations, 1) non-shooters, including groups with low- and high-risk of potentially containing GSR-like residues, and 2) individuals involved in a firing event (shooters, bystanders, and shooters performing post-shooting activities). The study analyzed over 400 samples via a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methodology with complexing agents. Exploratory statistical tools and machine learning algorithms (neural networks, NN) were used to evaluate the resulting mass spectral and quantitative data. This study observed lower occurrences of OGSR compounds in the non-shooter populations compared to IGSR analytes. The presence of GSR on authentic shooters versus other potential sources of false positives, such as bystanders and professions including police officers, agricultural workers, and mechanics, were further assessed by utilizing machine learning algorithms trained with the observed OGSR/IGSR traces. The probability of false negatives was also estimated with groups who performed regular activities after firing. Additionally, the low-risk background set allowed documentation of GSR occurrence in the general population. The probabilistic outputs of the neural network models were utilized to calculate likelihood ratios (LR) to measure the weight of the evidence. Using both the IGSR and OGSR profiles, the NN model’s accuracy ranged from 90 to 99%, depending on the subpopulation complexity. The log-LR histograms and Tippet plots show the method can discriminate between each sub-population and low rates of misleading evidence, suggesting that the proposed approach can be effectively used for a probabilistic interpretation of GSR evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信