LD50测试。

E Paget
{"title":"LD50测试。","authors":"E Paget","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0773.1983.tb02680.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The nature of the LD50 test and its central place in the conceptual development of pharmacology is reviewed. The results of the test and possible uses are outlined. Some guidelines are set out for the development of alternatives to LD50 tests. Some circumstances are suggested in which it seems likely that some form of the test will continue to be required. It is concluded that the problem of replacing the LD50 test with apparently more elegant methods is part of the larger and more fundamental problem of bringing science to the study and regulation of toxicology.</p>","PeriodicalId":6972,"journal":{"name":"Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica","volume":"52 Suppl 2 ","pages":"6-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1983.tb02680.x","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The LD50 test.\",\"authors\":\"E Paget\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1600-0773.1983.tb02680.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The nature of the LD50 test and its central place in the conceptual development of pharmacology is reviewed. The results of the test and possible uses are outlined. Some guidelines are set out for the development of alternatives to LD50 tests. Some circumstances are suggested in which it seems likely that some form of the test will continue to be required. It is concluded that the problem of replacing the LD50 test with apparently more elegant methods is part of the larger and more fundamental problem of bringing science to the study and regulation of toxicology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica\",\"volume\":\"52 Suppl 2 \",\"pages\":\"6-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1983.tb02680.x\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1983.tb02680.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pharmacologica et toxicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0773.1983.tb02680.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文回顾了LD50试验的性质及其在药理学概念发展中的中心地位。概述了试验结果和可能的用途。为开发LD50测试的替代方法制定了一些准则。在某些情况下,似乎有可能继续需要某种形式的测试。结论是,用显然更优雅的方法取代LD50测试的问题是将科学引入毒理学研究和管理这一更大、更根本的问题的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The LD50 test.

The nature of the LD50 test and its central place in the conceptual development of pharmacology is reviewed. The results of the test and possible uses are outlined. Some guidelines are set out for the development of alternatives to LD50 tests. Some circumstances are suggested in which it seems likely that some form of the test will continue to be required. It is concluded that the problem of replacing the LD50 test with apparently more elegant methods is part of the larger and more fundamental problem of bringing science to the study and regulation of toxicology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信