儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒。小剂量静脉注射胰岛素与常规治疗的疗效[作者简介]。

Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde Pub Date : 1980-04-01
M Frank, A Evenschor, R Joosten, H Hörnchen, M Habedank
{"title":"儿童糖尿病酮症酸中毒。小剂量静脉注射胰岛素与常规治疗的疗效[作者简介]。","authors":"M Frank,&nbsp;A Evenschor,&nbsp;R Joosten,&nbsp;H Hörnchen,&nbsp;M Habedank","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 1972, the treatment of diabetic coma, ketoacidotic or hyperosmolar, with regular infusions of low doses of insulin, is a well-established form of therapy. Pediatricians all over the world apply this regimen regularly since 1975. In contrast to this there is the regime of intravenous or intramuscular application of high doses of insulin. To control the effectivity of these two methods, we compared two approximately identical groups of patients and analysed 17 different parameters. The patients of the low dose insulin infusion regimen needed less insulin, potassium and bicarbonate and reached earlier a bloodglucose level of 300 mg/dl. They also had a rapid and uneventful restoration of their electrolyte metabolism. Hypoglycaemia did not occur. There was no significant hypokalaemia or hypernatraemia. In contrast to this, the conventionally treated group showed much more complications. The hospital stay and the daily requirement of insulin was significantly higher. We believe that the low dose infusion regimen of insulin is a safe and easy therapeutic method. It surely is an alternative way for treating diabetic coma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19021,"journal":{"name":"Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Diabetic ketoacidosis in children. Effectivity of therapy with small doses of insulin applicated intravenously versus conventional therapy (author's transl)].\",\"authors\":\"M Frank,&nbsp;A Evenschor,&nbsp;R Joosten,&nbsp;H Hörnchen,&nbsp;M Habedank\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since 1972, the treatment of diabetic coma, ketoacidotic or hyperosmolar, with regular infusions of low doses of insulin, is a well-established form of therapy. Pediatricians all over the world apply this regimen regularly since 1975. In contrast to this there is the regime of intravenous or intramuscular application of high doses of insulin. To control the effectivity of these two methods, we compared two approximately identical groups of patients and analysed 17 different parameters. The patients of the low dose insulin infusion regimen needed less insulin, potassium and bicarbonate and reached earlier a bloodglucose level of 300 mg/dl. They also had a rapid and uneventful restoration of their electrolyte metabolism. Hypoglycaemia did not occur. There was no significant hypokalaemia or hypernatraemia. In contrast to this, the conventionally treated group showed much more complications. The hospital stay and the daily requirement of insulin was significantly higher. We believe that the low dose infusion regimen of insulin is a safe and easy therapeutic method. It surely is an alternative way for treating diabetic coma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monatsschrift fur Kinderheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1972年以来,定期输注低剂量胰岛素治疗糖尿病昏迷、酮症酸中毒或高渗症是一种行之有效的治疗方法。自1975年以来,全世界的儿科医生都定期使用这种疗法。与此相反的是静脉注射或肌肉注射高剂量胰岛素。为了控制这两种方法的有效性,我们比较了两组大致相同的患者,并分析了17个不同的参数。低剂量胰岛素输注方案的患者需要较少的胰岛素、钾和碳酸氢盐,血糖水平较早达到300 mg/dl。他们的电解质代谢也得到了迅速而平稳的恢复。未发生低血糖。无明显的低钾血症或高钠血症。与此相反,常规治疗组出现了更多的并发症。住院时间和每日胰岛素需要量均显著增高。我们认为胰岛素低剂量输注方案是一种安全、简便的治疗方法。这无疑是治疗糖尿病昏迷的另一种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Diabetic ketoacidosis in children. Effectivity of therapy with small doses of insulin applicated intravenously versus conventional therapy (author's transl)].

Since 1972, the treatment of diabetic coma, ketoacidotic or hyperosmolar, with regular infusions of low doses of insulin, is a well-established form of therapy. Pediatricians all over the world apply this regimen regularly since 1975. In contrast to this there is the regime of intravenous or intramuscular application of high doses of insulin. To control the effectivity of these two methods, we compared two approximately identical groups of patients and analysed 17 different parameters. The patients of the low dose insulin infusion regimen needed less insulin, potassium and bicarbonate and reached earlier a bloodglucose level of 300 mg/dl. They also had a rapid and uneventful restoration of their electrolyte metabolism. Hypoglycaemia did not occur. There was no significant hypokalaemia or hypernatraemia. In contrast to this, the conventionally treated group showed much more complications. The hospital stay and the daily requirement of insulin was significantly higher. We believe that the low dose infusion regimen of insulin is a safe and easy therapeutic method. It surely is an alternative way for treating diabetic coma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信