莫利帕欣胶囊与曲唑酮液体制剂在正常人体内的生物利用度比较研究。

A W Harcus, A E Ward, S I Ankier, G R Kimber
{"title":"莫利帕欣胶囊与曲唑酮液体制剂在正常人体内的生物利用度比较研究。","authors":"A W Harcus,&nbsp;A E Ward,&nbsp;S I Ankier,&nbsp;G R Kimber","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2710.1983.tb01041.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pharmacokinetic parameters of Molipaxin capsules and a trazodone liquid formulation have been compared in healthy volunteers. The mean area under the plasma concentration/time curve was 10.07 micrograms h ml-1 and 10.44 micrograms h ml-1, for Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. There was considerable individual variation between the observed maximum plasma concentration of Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid but the mean values of 1.61 micrograms/ml and 1.66 micrograms/ml, respectively, were very similar. The time to observed maximum plasma concentrations varied from 15 min to 4 h, but there was no statistical difference between the two formulations. The terminal phase half-life was 7.16 h for Molipaxin capsules and 6.73 h for trazodone liquid. The difference was not statistically significant. Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid have similar kinetic profiles and they are considered to have comparable bioavailability. Tolerance to the two formulations was similar.</p>","PeriodicalId":77862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and hospital pharmacy","volume":"8 2","pages":"125-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2710.1983.tb01041.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative bioavailability study of Molipaxin capsules and a trazodone liquid formulation in normal volunteers.\",\"authors\":\"A W Harcus,&nbsp;A E Ward,&nbsp;S I Ankier,&nbsp;G R Kimber\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1365-2710.1983.tb01041.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The pharmacokinetic parameters of Molipaxin capsules and a trazodone liquid formulation have been compared in healthy volunteers. The mean area under the plasma concentration/time curve was 10.07 micrograms h ml-1 and 10.44 micrograms h ml-1, for Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. There was considerable individual variation between the observed maximum plasma concentration of Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid but the mean values of 1.61 micrograms/ml and 1.66 micrograms/ml, respectively, were very similar. The time to observed maximum plasma concentrations varied from 15 min to 4 h, but there was no statistical difference between the two formulations. The terminal phase half-life was 7.16 h for Molipaxin capsules and 6.73 h for trazodone liquid. The difference was not statistically significant. Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid have similar kinetic profiles and they are considered to have comparable bioavailability. Tolerance to the two formulations was similar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical and hospital pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"125-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2710.1983.tb01041.x\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical and hospital pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.1983.tb01041.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2710.1983.tb01041.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较了莫利帕欣胶囊和曲唑酮液体制剂在健康志愿者体内的药动学参数。莫利帕欣胶囊和曲唑酮液的血药浓度/时间曲线下平均面积分别为10.07和10.44微克h ml-1。差异无统计学意义。莫利帕欣胶囊和曲唑酮液体的最大血药浓度存在较大的个体差异,但其平均值分别为1.61微克/毫升和1.66微克/毫升,两者非常相似。观察到最大血浆浓度的时间从15分钟到4小时不等,但两种制剂之间没有统计学差异。莫利帕欣胶囊的终末半衰期为7.16 h,曲唑酮液体的终末半衰期为6.73 h。差异无统计学意义。莫利帕欣胶囊和曲唑酮液体具有相似的动力学特征,它们被认为具有相当的生物利用度。对两种制剂的耐受性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative bioavailability study of Molipaxin capsules and a trazodone liquid formulation in normal volunteers.

The pharmacokinetic parameters of Molipaxin capsules and a trazodone liquid formulation have been compared in healthy volunteers. The mean area under the plasma concentration/time curve was 10.07 micrograms h ml-1 and 10.44 micrograms h ml-1, for Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. There was considerable individual variation between the observed maximum plasma concentration of Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid but the mean values of 1.61 micrograms/ml and 1.66 micrograms/ml, respectively, were very similar. The time to observed maximum plasma concentrations varied from 15 min to 4 h, but there was no statistical difference between the two formulations. The terminal phase half-life was 7.16 h for Molipaxin capsules and 6.73 h for trazodone liquid. The difference was not statistically significant. Molipaxin capsules and trazodone liquid have similar kinetic profiles and they are considered to have comparable bioavailability. Tolerance to the two formulations was similar.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信