作为听觉感受器的龟壳。

The Journal of auditory research Pub Date : 1983-10-01
M L Lenhardt, S W Harkins
{"title":"作为听觉感受器的龟壳。","authors":"M L Lenhardt,&nbsp;S W Harkins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evoked responses were obtained from the brainstem of seven box turtles (T. carolina) using air conducted stimuli and also vibratory stimuli applied directly to the carapace. Both stimuli elicited similar neural electrical responses that differed chiefly in sensitivity. The vibratory responses were lower in threshold and higher in amplitude than responses to air conducted clicks. Further, simultaneous masking of vibratory clicks by air conducted noise had negligible effects, whereas vibratory masking completely suppressed the responses to airborne sound, suggesting that the turtle ear is differentially sensitive to sound and vibration. Spinal blocking of somatic pathways had negligible effects on the vibratory-evoked responses, suggesting that the latter originate in the auditory system and are stimulated by bone conduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":76646,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of auditory research","volume":"23 4","pages":"251-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turtle shells as an auditory receptor.\",\"authors\":\"M L Lenhardt,&nbsp;S W Harkins\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evoked responses were obtained from the brainstem of seven box turtles (T. carolina) using air conducted stimuli and also vibratory stimuli applied directly to the carapace. Both stimuli elicited similar neural electrical responses that differed chiefly in sensitivity. The vibratory responses were lower in threshold and higher in amplitude than responses to air conducted clicks. Further, simultaneous masking of vibratory clicks by air conducted noise had negligible effects, whereas vibratory masking completely suppressed the responses to airborne sound, suggesting that the turtle ear is differentially sensitive to sound and vibration. Spinal blocking of somatic pathways had negligible effects on the vibratory-evoked responses, suggesting that the latter originate in the auditory system and are stimulated by bone conduction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"volume\":\"23 4\",\"pages\":\"251-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of auditory research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of auditory research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用空气传导刺激和直接施加于龟壳的振动刺激,从7只箱龟的脑干获得了诱发反应。两种刺激都引起了相似的神经电反应,主要区别在于敏感性。振动响应的阈值较低,振幅较高。此外,空气传导噪音同时掩盖振动咔嗒声的影响可以忽略,而振动掩蔽完全抑制了对空气声音的响应,这表明海龟耳朵对声音和振动的敏感程度不同。脊柱阻断躯体通路对振动诱发反应的影响可以忽略不计,这表明后者起源于听觉系统,并受到骨传导的刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Turtle shells as an auditory receptor.

Evoked responses were obtained from the brainstem of seven box turtles (T. carolina) using air conducted stimuli and also vibratory stimuli applied directly to the carapace. Both stimuli elicited similar neural electrical responses that differed chiefly in sensitivity. The vibratory responses were lower in threshold and higher in amplitude than responses to air conducted clicks. Further, simultaneous masking of vibratory clicks by air conducted noise had negligible effects, whereas vibratory masking completely suppressed the responses to airborne sound, suggesting that the turtle ear is differentially sensitive to sound and vibration. Spinal blocking of somatic pathways had negligible effects on the vibratory-evoked responses, suggesting that the latter originate in the auditory system and are stimulated by bone conduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信