P E Munday, J M Carder, N F Hanna, D Taylor-Robinson
{"title":"一次拭子是否足以检测子宫颈衣原体感染?","authors":"P E Munday, J M Carder, N F Hanna, D Taylor-Robinson","doi":"10.1136/sti.60.6.384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three swabs were taken from the cervix of each of 104 women for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. The processing of three swabs instead of one increased the isolation rate by only 2%, and later swabs did not result in the production of more chlamydial inclusions than first swabs. In most clinics, therefore, a single cervical swab is adequate to detect chlamydial infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":22309,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Venereal Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/sti.60.6.384","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is one swab enough to detect chlamydial infection of the cervix?\",\"authors\":\"P E Munday, J M Carder, N F Hanna, D Taylor-Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/sti.60.6.384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three swabs were taken from the cervix of each of 104 women for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. The processing of three swabs instead of one increased the isolation rate by only 2%, and later swabs did not result in the production of more chlamydial inclusions than first swabs. In most clinics, therefore, a single cervical swab is adequate to detect chlamydial infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of Venereal Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/sti.60.6.384\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of Venereal Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.60.6.384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Venereal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.60.6.384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is one swab enough to detect chlamydial infection of the cervix?
Three swabs were taken from the cervix of each of 104 women for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. The processing of three swabs instead of one increased the isolation rate by only 2%, and later swabs did not result in the production of more chlamydial inclusions than first swabs. In most clinics, therefore, a single cervical swab is adequate to detect chlamydial infection.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
