[对百科精神病学进步概念的批评]。

Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie Pub Date : 1984-01-01

J Glatzel

{"title":"[对百科精神病学进步概念的批评]。","authors":"J Glatzel","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of progress in biological psychiatry its being opposed in this study to another one which makes it necessary to adopt a different mode of thinking and to be ready for a change of paradigms. Both concepts are not exclusive of each other, yet, one cannot confer either of them an absolute value without limiting the subject and the methological tools necessary to psychiatric-psychopathological research. This will be explained, using everyday clinical cases.","PeriodicalId":21430,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie","volume":"134 2","pages":"295-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Criticism of the concept of progress in encyclopedic psychiatry].\",\"authors\":\"J Glatzel\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of progress in biological psychiatry its being opposed in this study to another one which makes it necessary to adopt a different mode of thinking and to be ready for a change of paradigms. Both concepts are not exclusive of each other, yet, one cannot confer either of them an absolute value without limiting the subject and the methological tools necessary to psychiatric-psychopathological research. This will be explained, using everyday clinical cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie\",\"volume\":\"134 2\",\"pages\":\"295-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中，生物精神病学的进步概念与另一个概念是对立的，这使得有必要采用不同的思维模式，并为范式的变化做好准备。这两个概念并不是相互排斥的，然而，如果不限制精神病学-精神病理学研究所必需的主题和方法工具，就不能赋予它们任何一个绝对的价值。我们将使用日常临床病例来解释这一点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

[Criticism of the concept of progress in encyclopedic psychiatry].

The concept of progress in biological psychiatry its being opposed in this study to another one which makes it necessary to adopt a different mode of thinking and to be ready for a change of paradigms. Both concepts are not exclusive of each other, yet, one cannot confer either of them an absolute value without limiting the subject and the methological tools necessary to psychiatric-psychopathological research. This will be explained, using everyday clinical cases.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie = Archives suisses de neurologie, neurochirurgie et de psychiatrie

自引率

0.00%

发文量